summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/fimd.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* armv7: Move Exynos from 'cpu' to 'soc'.Hung-Te Lin2014-08-261-145/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU. We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot. Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891 Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
* exynos5: Refactor crazy old U-Boot base address macros awayJulius Werner2014-08-141-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name() boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make another device fit into that ugly scheme). This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably didn't catch all differences). Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
* cpu: Fix spellingMartin Roth2013-07-111-2/+2
| | | | | | | | Change-Id: I69c46648de0689e9bed84c7726906024ad65e769 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3729 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 codeStefan Reinauer2013-07-101-10/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports. There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the 5250's Kconfig file. Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
* Add .h files for samsung exynos 5250Ronald G. Minnich2012-11-281-0/+137
Per a conversation with Stefan, these chip-dependent files are moved to the src tree, in the manner of other chips (north and southbridge). Change-Id: I12645ba05eb241eda200ed06cb633541a6a98119 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1925 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud