Pull in r227752 from upstream llvm trunk (by Michael Kuperstein):

  [X86] Convert esp-relative movs of function arguments to pushes, step 2

  This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
  This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
  reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
  have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
  alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.

  (Re-commit of r227728)

  Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789

This helps to get sys/boot/i386/boot2 below the required size again,
when optimizing with -Oz.

11 files changed, 534 insertions, 135 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
index 8bd5817..219b64d 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86.h
@@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ FunctionPass *createX86PadShortFunctions();
 /// to eliminate execution delays in some Atom processors.
 FunctionPass *createX86FixupLEAs();
 
+/// createX86CallFrameOptimization - Return a pass that optimizes
+/// the code-size of x86 call sequences. This is done by replacing
+/// esp-relative movs with pushes.
+FunctionPass *createX86CallFrameOptimization();
+
 } // End llvm namespace
 
 #endif
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86CallFrameOptimization.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86CallFrameOptimization.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fae489e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86CallFrameOptimization.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,400 @@
+//===----- X86CallFrameOptimization.cpp - Optimize x86 call sequences -----===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file defines a pass that optimizes call sequences on x86.
+// Currently, it converts movs of function parameters onto the stack into 
+// pushes. This is beneficial for two main reasons:
+// 1) The push instruction encoding is much smaller than an esp-relative mov
+// 2) It is possible to push memory arguments directly. So, if the
+//    the transformation is preformed pre-reg-alloc, it can help relieve
+//    register pressure.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include <algorithm>
+
+#include "X86.h"
+#include "X86InstrInfo.h"
+#include "X86Subtarget.h"
+#include "X86MachineFunctionInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "x86-cf-opt"
+
+cl::opt<bool> NoX86CFOpt("no-x86-call-frame-opt",
+              cl::desc("Avoid optimizing x86 call frames for size"),
+              cl::init(false), cl::Hidden);
+
+namespace {
+class X86CallFrameOptimization : public MachineFunctionPass {
+public:
+  X86CallFrameOptimization() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {}
+
+  bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
+
+private:
+  bool shouldPerformTransformation(MachineFunction &MF);
+
+  bool adjustCallSequence(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
+                          MachineBasicBlock::iterator I);
+
+  MachineInstr *canFoldIntoRegPush(MachineBasicBlock::iterator FrameSetup,
+                                   unsigned Reg);
+
+  const char *getPassName() const override {
+    return "X86 Optimize Call Frame";
+  }
+
+  const TargetInstrInfo *TII;
+  const TargetFrameLowering *TFL;
+  const MachineRegisterInfo *MRI;
+  static char ID;
+};
+
+char X86CallFrameOptimization::ID = 0;
+}
+
+FunctionPass *llvm::createX86CallFrameOptimization() {
+  return new X86CallFrameOptimization();
+}
+
+// This checks whether the transformation is legal and profitable
+bool X86CallFrameOptimization::shouldPerformTransformation(MachineFunction &MF) {
+  if (NoX86CFOpt.getValue())
+    return false;
+
+  // We currently only support call sequences where *all* parameters.
+  // are passed on the stack.
+  // No point in running this in 64-bit mode, since some arguments are
+  // passed in-register in all common calling conventions, so the pattern
+  // we're looking for will never match.
+  const X86Subtarget &STI = MF.getTarget().getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
+  if (STI.is64Bit())
+    return false;
+
+  // You would expect straight-line code between call-frame setup and
+  // call-frame destroy. You would be wrong. There are circumstances (e.g.
+  // CMOV_GR8 expansion of a select that feeds a function call!) where we can
+  // end up with the setup and the destroy in different basic blocks.
+  // This is bad, and breaks SP adjustment.
+  // So, check that all of the frames in the function are closed inside
+  // the same block, and, for good measure, that there are no nested frames.
+  int FrameSetupOpcode = TII->getCallFrameSetupOpcode();
+  int FrameDestroyOpcode = TII->getCallFrameDestroyOpcode();
+  for (MachineBasicBlock &BB : MF) {
+    bool InsideFrameSequence = false;
+    for (MachineInstr &MI : BB) {
+      if (MI.getOpcode() == FrameSetupOpcode) {
+        if (InsideFrameSequence)
+          return false;
+        InsideFrameSequence = true;
+      }
+      else if (MI.getOpcode() == FrameDestroyOpcode) {
+        if (!InsideFrameSequence)
+          return false;
+        InsideFrameSequence = false;
+      }
+    }
+
+    if (InsideFrameSequence)
+      return false;
+  }
+
+  // Now that we know the transformation is legal, check if it is
+  // profitable.
+  // TODO: Add a heuristic that actually looks at the function,
+  //       and enable this for more cases.
+
+  // This transformation is always a win when we expected to have
+  // a reserved call frame. Under other circumstances, it may be either 
+  // a win or a loss, and requires a heuristic.
+  // For now, enable it only for the relatively clear win cases.
+  bool CannotReserveFrame = MF.getFrameInfo()->hasVarSizedObjects();
+  if (CannotReserveFrame)
+    return true;
+
+  // For now, don't even try to evaluate the profitability when
+  // not optimizing for size.
+  AttributeSet FnAttrs = MF.getFunction()->getAttributes();
+  bool OptForSize =
+    FnAttrs.hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex,
+    Attribute::OptimizeForSize) ||
+    FnAttrs.hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Attribute::MinSize);
+
+  if (!OptForSize)
+    return false;
+
+  // Stack re-alignment can make this unprofitable even in terms of size.
+  // As mentioned above, a better heuristic is needed. For now, don't do this
+  // when the required alignment is above 8. (4 would be the safe choice, but
+  // some experimentation showed 8 is generally good).
+  if (TFL->getStackAlignment() > 8)
+    return false;
+
+  return true;
+}
+
+bool X86CallFrameOptimization::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
+  TII = MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
+  TFL = MF.getSubtarget().getFrameLowering();
+  MRI = &MF.getRegInfo();
+
+  if (!shouldPerformTransformation(MF))
+    return false;
+
+  int FrameSetupOpcode = TII->getCallFrameSetupOpcode();
+
+  bool Changed = false;
+
+  for (MachineFunction::iterator BB = MF.begin(), E = MF.end(); BB != E; ++BB)
+    for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(); I != BB->end(); ++I)
+      if (I->getOpcode() == FrameSetupOpcode)
+        Changed |= adjustCallSequence(MF, *BB, I);
+
+  return Changed;
+}
+
+bool X86CallFrameOptimization::adjustCallSequence(MachineFunction &MF,
+                                                MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
+                                                MachineBasicBlock::iterator I) {
+
+  // Check that this particular call sequence is amenable to the
+  // transformation.
+  const X86RegisterInfo &RegInfo = *static_cast<const X86RegisterInfo *>(
+                                       MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo());
+  unsigned StackPtr = RegInfo.getStackRegister();
+  int FrameDestroyOpcode = TII->getCallFrameDestroyOpcode();
+
+  // We expect to enter this at the beginning of a call sequence
+  assert(I->getOpcode() == TII->getCallFrameSetupOpcode());
+  MachineBasicBlock::iterator FrameSetup = I++;
+
+  
+  // For globals in PIC mode, we can have some LEAs here.
+  // Ignore them, they don't bother us.
+  // TODO: Extend this to something that covers more cases.
+  while (I->getOpcode() == X86::LEA32r)
+    ++I;
+  
+  // We expect a copy instruction here.
+  // TODO: The copy instruction is a lowering artifact.
+  //       We should also support a copy-less version, where the stack
+  //       pointer is used directly.
+  if (!I->isCopy() || !I->getOperand(0).isReg())
+    return false;
+  MachineBasicBlock::iterator SPCopy = I++;
+  StackPtr = SPCopy->getOperand(0).getReg();
+
+  // Scan the call setup sequence for the pattern we're looking for.
+  // We only handle a simple case - a sequence of MOV32mi or MOV32mr
+  // instructions, that push a sequence of 32-bit values onto the stack, with
+  // no gaps between them.
+  SmallVector<MachineInstr*, 4> MovVector(4, nullptr);
+  unsigned int MaxAdjust = FrameSetup->getOperand(0).getImm() / 4;
+  if (MaxAdjust > 4)
+    MovVector.resize(MaxAdjust, nullptr);
+
+  do {
+    int Opcode = I->getOpcode();
+    if (Opcode != X86::MOV32mi && Opcode != X86::MOV32mr)
+      break;
+
+    // We only want movs of the form:
+    // movl imm/r32, k(%esp)
+    // If we run into something else, bail.
+    // Note that AddrBaseReg may, counter to its name, not be a register,
+    // but rather a frame index.
+    // TODO: Support the fi case. This should probably work now that we
+    // have the infrastructure to track the stack pointer within a call
+    // sequence.
+    if (!I->getOperand(X86::AddrBaseReg).isReg() ||
+        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrBaseReg).getReg() != StackPtr) ||
+        !I->getOperand(X86::AddrScaleAmt).isImm() ||
+        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrScaleAmt).getImm() != 1) ||
+        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrIndexReg).getReg() != X86::NoRegister) ||
+        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrSegmentReg).getReg() != X86::NoRegister) ||
+        !I->getOperand(X86::AddrDisp).isImm())
+      return false;
+
+    int64_t StackDisp = I->getOperand(X86::AddrDisp).getImm();
+    assert(StackDisp >= 0 && "Negative stack displacement when passing parameters");
+
+    // We really don't want to consider the unaligned case.
+    if (StackDisp % 4)
+      return false;
+    StackDisp /= 4;
+
+    assert((size_t)StackDisp < MovVector.size() &&
+      "Function call has more parameters than the stack is adjusted for.");
+
+    // If the same stack slot is being filled twice, something's fishy.
+    if (MovVector[StackDisp] != nullptr)
+      return false;
+    MovVector[StackDisp] = I;
+
+    ++I;
+  } while (I != MBB.end());
+
+  // We now expect the end of the sequence - a call and a stack adjust.
+  if (I == MBB.end())
+    return false;
+
+  // For PCrel calls, we expect an additional COPY of the basereg.
+  // If we find one, skip it.
+  if (I->isCopy()) {
+    if (I->getOperand(1).getReg() ==
+      MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>()->getGlobalBaseReg())
+      ++I;
+    else
+      return false;
+  }
+
+  if (!I->isCall())
+    return false;
+  MachineBasicBlock::iterator Call = I;
+  if ((++I)->getOpcode() != FrameDestroyOpcode)
+    return false;
+
+  // Now, go through the vector, and see that we don't have any gaps,
+  // but only a series of 32-bit MOVs.
+  
+  int64_t ExpectedDist = 0;
+  auto MMI = MovVector.begin(), MME = MovVector.end();
+  for (; MMI != MME; ++MMI, ExpectedDist += 4)
+    if (*MMI == nullptr)
+      break;
+  
+  // If the call had no parameters, do nothing
+  if (!ExpectedDist)
+    return false;
+
+  // We are either at the last parameter, or a gap. 
+  // Make sure it's not a gap
+  for (; MMI != MME; ++MMI)
+    if (*MMI != nullptr)
+      return false;
+
+  // Ok, we can in fact do the transformation for this call.
+  // Do not remove the FrameSetup instruction, but adjust the parameters.
+  // PEI will end up finalizing the handling of this.
+  FrameSetup->getOperand(1).setImm(ExpectedDist);
+
+  DebugLoc DL = I->getDebugLoc();
+  // Now, iterate through the vector in reverse order, and replace the movs
+  // with pushes. MOVmi/MOVmr doesn't have any defs, so no need to 
+  // replace uses.
+  for (int Idx = (ExpectedDist / 4) - 1; Idx >= 0; --Idx) {
+    MachineBasicBlock::iterator MOV = *MovVector[Idx];
+    MachineOperand PushOp = MOV->getOperand(X86::AddrNumOperands);
+    if (MOV->getOpcode() == X86::MOV32mi) {
+      unsigned PushOpcode = X86::PUSHi32;
+      // If the operand is a small (8-bit) immediate, we can use a
+      // PUSH instruction with a shorter encoding.
+      // Note that isImm() may fail even though this is a MOVmi, because
+      // the operand can also be a symbol.
+      if (PushOp.isImm()) {
+        int64_t Val = PushOp.getImm();
+        if (isInt<8>(Val))
+          PushOpcode = X86::PUSH32i8;
+      }
+      BuildMI(MBB, Call, DL, TII->get(PushOpcode)).addOperand(PushOp);
+    } else {
+      unsigned int Reg = PushOp.getReg();
+
+      // If PUSHrmm is not slow on this target, try to fold the source of the
+      // push into the instruction.
+      const X86Subtarget &ST = MF.getTarget().getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
+      bool SlowPUSHrmm = ST.isAtom() || ST.isSLM();
+
+      // Check that this is legal to fold. Right now, we're extremely
+      // conservative about that.
+      MachineInstr *DefMov = nullptr;
+      if (!SlowPUSHrmm && (DefMov = canFoldIntoRegPush(FrameSetup, Reg))) {
+        MachineInstr *Push = BuildMI(MBB, Call, DL, TII->get(X86::PUSH32rmm));
+
+        unsigned NumOps = DefMov->getDesc().getNumOperands();
+        for (unsigned i = NumOps - X86::AddrNumOperands; i != NumOps; ++i)
+          Push->addOperand(DefMov->getOperand(i));
+
+        DefMov->eraseFromParent();
+      } else {
+        BuildMI(MBB, Call, DL, TII->get(X86::PUSH32r)).addReg(Reg).getInstr();
+      }
+    }
+
+    MBB.erase(MOV);
+  }
+
+  // The stack-pointer copy is no longer used in the call sequences.
+  // There should not be any other users, but we can't commit to that, so:
+  if (MRI->use_empty(SPCopy->getOperand(0).getReg()))
+    SPCopy->eraseFromParent();
+
+  // Once we've done this, we need to make sure PEI doesn't assume a reserved
+  // frame.
+  X86MachineFunctionInfo *FuncInfo = MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>();
+  FuncInfo->setHasPushSequences(true);
+
+  return true;
+}
+
+MachineInstr *X86CallFrameOptimization::canFoldIntoRegPush(
+    MachineBasicBlock::iterator FrameSetup, unsigned Reg) {
+  // Do an extremely restricted form of load folding.
+  // ISel will often create patterns like:
+  // movl    4(%edi), %eax
+  // movl    8(%edi), %ecx
+  // movl    12(%edi), %edx
+  // movl    %edx, 8(%esp)
+  // movl    %ecx, 4(%esp)
+  // movl    %eax, (%esp)
+  // call
+  // Get rid of those with prejudice.
+  if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg))
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Make sure this is the only use of Reg.
+  if (!MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(Reg))
+    return nullptr;
+
+  MachineBasicBlock::iterator DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(Reg);
+
+  // Make sure the def is a MOV from memory.
+  // If the def is an another block, give up.
+  if (DefMI->getOpcode() != X86::MOV32rm ||
+      DefMI->getParent() != FrameSetup->getParent())
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Be careful with movs that load from a stack slot, since it may get
+  // resolved incorrectly.
+  // TODO: Again, we already have the infrastructure, so this should work.
+  if (!DefMI->getOperand(1).isReg())
+    return nullptr;
+
+  // Now, make sure everything else up until the ADJCALLSTACK is a sequence
+  // of MOVs. To be less conservative would require duplicating a lot of the
+  // logic from PeepholeOptimizer.
+  // FIXME: A possibly better approach would be to teach the PeepholeOptimizer
+  // to be smarter about folding into pushes. 
+  for (auto I = DefMI; I != FrameSetup; ++I)
+    if (I->getOpcode() != X86::MOV32rm)
+      return nullptr;
+
+  return DefMI;
+}
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
index 5d71eac..688a544 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
@@ -2735,7 +2735,7 @@ bool X86FastISel::fastLowerCall(CallLoweringInfo &CLI) {
   // Issue CALLSEQ_START
   unsigned AdjStackDown = TII.getCallFrameSetupOpcode();
   BuildMI(*FuncInfo.MBB, FuncInfo.InsertPt, DbgLoc, TII.get(AdjStackDown))
-    .addImm(NumBytes);
+    .addImm(NumBytes).addImm(0);
 
   // Walk the register/memloc assignments, inserting copies/loads.
   const X86RegisterInfo *RegInfo = static_cast<const X86RegisterInfo *>(
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp
index 16aab16..f2eb6a8 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp
@@ -38,7 +38,34 @@ using namespace llvm;
 extern cl::opt<bool> ForceStackAlign;
 
 bool X86FrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
-  return !MF.getFrameInfo()->hasVarSizedObjects();
+  return !MF.getFrameInfo()->hasVarSizedObjects() &&
+         !MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>()->getHasPushSequences();
+}
+
+/// canSimplifyCallFramePseudos - If there is a reserved call frame, the
+/// call frame pseudos can be simplified.  Having a FP, as in the default
+/// implementation, is not sufficient here since we can't always use it.
+/// Use a more nuanced condition.
+bool
+X86FrameLowering::canSimplifyCallFramePseudos(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
+  const X86RegisterInfo *TRI = static_cast<const X86RegisterInfo *>
+                               (MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo());
+  return hasReservedCallFrame(MF) ||
+         (hasFP(MF) && !TRI->needsStackRealignment(MF))
+         || TRI->hasBasePointer(MF);
+}
+
+// needsFrameIndexResolution - Do we need to perform FI resolution for
+// this function. Normally, this is required only when the function
+// has any stack objects. However, FI resolution actually has another job,
+// not apparent from the title - it resolves callframesetup/destroy 
+// that were not simplified earlier.
+// So, this is required for x86 functions that have push sequences even
+// when there are no stack objects.
+bool
+X86FrameLowering::needsFrameIndexResolution(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
+  return MF.getFrameInfo()->hasStackObjects() ||
+         MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>()->getHasPushSequences();
 }
 
 /// hasFP - Return true if the specified function should have a dedicated frame
@@ -93,16 +120,6 @@ static unsigned getANDriOpcode(bool IsLP64, int64_t Imm) {
   return X86::AND32ri;
 }
 
-static unsigned getPUSHiOpcode(bool IsLP64, MachineOperand MO) {
-  // We don't support LP64 for now.
-  assert(!IsLP64);
-
-  if (MO.isImm() && isInt<8>(MO.getImm()))
-    return X86::PUSH32i8;
-
-  return X86::PUSHi32;;
-}
-
 static unsigned getLEArOpcode(unsigned IsLP64) {
   return IsLP64 ? X86::LEA64r : X86::LEA32r;
 }
@@ -1848,100 +1865,6 @@ void X86FrameLowering::adjustForHiPEPrologue(MachineFunction &MF) const {
 #endif
 }
 
-bool X86FrameLowering::
-convertArgMovsToPushes(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
-                       MachineBasicBlock::iterator I, uint64_t Amount) const {
-  const TargetInstrInfo &TII = *MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
-  const X86RegisterInfo &RegInfo = *static_cast<const X86RegisterInfo *>(
-    MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo());
-  unsigned StackPtr = RegInfo.getStackRegister();
-
-  // Scan the call setup sequence for the pattern we're looking for.
-  // We only handle a simple case now - a sequence of MOV32mi or MOV32mr
-  // instructions, that push a sequence of 32-bit values onto the stack, with
-  // no gaps.  
-  std::map<int64_t, MachineBasicBlock::iterator> MovMap;
-  do {
-    int Opcode = I->getOpcode();
-    if (Opcode != X86::MOV32mi && Opcode != X86::MOV32mr)
-      break;
- 
-    // We only want movs of the form:
-    // movl imm/r32, k(%ecx)
-    // If we run into something else, bail
-    // Note that AddrBaseReg may, counterintuitively, not be a register...
-    if (!I->getOperand(X86::AddrBaseReg).isReg() || 
-        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrBaseReg).getReg() != StackPtr) ||
-        !I->getOperand(X86::AddrScaleAmt).isImm() ||
-        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrScaleAmt).getImm() != 1) ||
-        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrIndexReg).getReg() != X86::NoRegister) ||
-        (I->getOperand(X86::AddrSegmentReg).getReg() != X86::NoRegister) ||
-        !I->getOperand(X86::AddrDisp).isImm())
-      return false;
-
-    int64_t StackDisp = I->getOperand(X86::AddrDisp).getImm();
-    
-    // We don't want to consider the unaligned case.
-    if (StackDisp % 4)
-      return false;
-
-    // If the same stack slot is being filled twice, something's fishy.
-    if (!MovMap.insert(std::pair<int64_t, MachineInstr*>(StackDisp, I)).second)
-      return false;
-
-    ++I;
-  } while (I != MBB.end());
-
-  // We now expect the end of the sequence - a call and a stack adjust.
-  if (I == MBB.end())
-    return false;
-  if (!I->isCall())
-    return false;
-  MachineBasicBlock::iterator Call = I;
-  if ((++I)->getOpcode() != TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode())
-    return false;
-
-  // Now, go through the map, and see that we don't have any gaps,
-  // but only a series of 32-bit MOVs.
-  // Since std::map provides ordered iteration, the original order
-  // of the MOVs doesn't matter.
-  int64_t ExpectedDist = 0;
-  for (auto MMI = MovMap.begin(), MME = MovMap.end(); MMI != MME; 
-       ++MMI, ExpectedDist += 4)
-    if (MMI->first != ExpectedDist)
-      return false;
-
-  // Ok, everything looks fine. Do the transformation.
-  DebugLoc DL = I->getDebugLoc();
-
-  // It's possible the original stack adjustment amount was larger than
-  // that done by the pushes. If so, we still need a SUB.
-  Amount -= ExpectedDist;
-  if (Amount) {
-    MachineInstr* Sub = BuildMI(MBB, Call, DL,
-                          TII.get(getSUBriOpcode(false, Amount)), StackPtr)
-                  .addReg(StackPtr).addImm(Amount);
-    Sub->getOperand(3).setIsDead();
-  }
-
-  // Now, iterate through the map in reverse order, and replace the movs
-  // with pushes. MOVmi/MOVmr doesn't have any defs, so need to replace uses.
-  for (auto MMI = MovMap.rbegin(), MME = MovMap.rend(); MMI != MME; ++MMI) {
-    MachineBasicBlock::iterator MOV = MMI->second;
-    MachineOperand PushOp = MOV->getOperand(X86::AddrNumOperands);
-
-    // Replace MOVmr with PUSH32r, and MOVmi with PUSHi of appropriate size
-    int PushOpcode = X86::PUSH32r;
-    if (MOV->getOpcode() == X86::MOV32mi)
-      PushOpcode = getPUSHiOpcode(false, PushOp);
-
-    BuildMI(MBB, Call, DL, TII.get(PushOpcode)).addOperand(PushOp);
-    MBB.erase(MOV);
-  }
-
-  return true;
-}
-
 void X86FrameLowering::
 eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
                               MachineBasicBlock::iterator I) const {
@@ -1956,7 +1879,7 @@ eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
   bool IsLP64 = STI.isTarget64BitLP64();
   DebugLoc DL = I->getDebugLoc();
   uint64_t Amount = !reserveCallFrame ? I->getOperand(0).getImm() : 0;
-  uint64_t CalleeAmt = isDestroy ? I->getOperand(1).getImm() : 0;
+  uint64_t InternalAmt = (isDestroy || Amount) ? I->getOperand(1).getImm() : 0;
   I = MBB.erase(I);
 
   if (!reserveCallFrame) {
@@ -1976,24 +1899,18 @@ eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
     Amount = (Amount + StackAlign - 1) / StackAlign * StackAlign;
 
     MachineInstr *New = nullptr;
-    if (Opcode == TII.getCallFrameSetupOpcode()) {
-      // Try to convert movs to the stack into pushes.
-      // We currently only look for a pattern that appears in 32-bit
-      // calling conventions.
-      if (!IsLP64 && convertArgMovsToPushes(MF, MBB, I, Amount))
-        return;
-
-      New = BuildMI(MF, DL, TII.get(getSUBriOpcode(IsLP64, Amount)),
-                    StackPtr)
-        .addReg(StackPtr)
-        .addImm(Amount);
-    } else {
-      assert(Opcode == TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode());
 
-      // Factor out the amount the callee already popped.
-      Amount -= CalleeAmt;
+    // Factor out the amount that gets handled inside the sequence
+    // (Pushes of argument for frame setup, callee pops for frame destroy)
+    Amount -= InternalAmt;
+
+    if (Amount) {
+      if (Opcode == TII.getCallFrameSetupOpcode()) {
+        New = BuildMI(MF, DL, TII.get(getSUBriOpcode(IsLP64, Amount)), StackPtr)
+          .addReg(StackPtr).addImm(Amount);
+      } else {
+        assert(Opcode == TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode());
 
-      if (Amount) {
         unsigned Opc = getADDriOpcode(IsLP64, Amount);
         New = BuildMI(MF, DL, TII.get(Opc), StackPtr)
           .addReg(StackPtr).addImm(Amount);
@@ -2011,13 +1928,13 @@ eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
     return;
   }
 
-  if (Opcode == TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode() && CalleeAmt) {
+  if (Opcode == TII.getCallFrameDestroyOpcode() && InternalAmt) {
     // If we are performing frame pointer elimination and if the callee pops
     // something off the stack pointer, add it back.  We do this until we have
     // more advanced stack pointer tracking ability.
-    unsigned Opc = getSUBriOpcode(IsLP64, CalleeAmt);
+    unsigned Opc = getSUBriOpcode(IsLP64, InternalAmt);
     MachineInstr *New = BuildMI(MF, DL, TII.get(Opc), StackPtr)
-      .addReg(StackPtr).addImm(CalleeAmt);
+      .addReg(StackPtr).addImm(InternalAmt);
 
     // The EFLAGS implicit def is dead.
     New->getOperand(3).setIsDead();
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.h b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.h
index ee0ee22..9cb887a 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.h
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.h
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ public:
 
   bool hasFP(const MachineFunction &MF) const override;
   bool hasReservedCallFrame(const MachineFunction &MF) const override;
+  bool canSimplifyCallFramePseudos(const MachineFunction &MF) const override;
+  bool needsFrameIndexResolution(const MachineFunction &MF) const override;
 
   int getFrameIndexOffset(const MachineFunction &MF, int FI) const override;
   int getFrameIndexReference(const MachineFunction &MF, int FI,
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
index ed0a634..880c982 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td
@@ -43,15 +43,18 @@ let hasSideEffects = 0, isNotDuplicable = 1, Uses = [ESP] in
 // Pessimistically assume ADJCALLSTACKDOWN / ADJCALLSTACKUP will become
 // sub / add which can clobber EFLAGS.
 let Defs = [ESP, EFLAGS], Uses = [ESP] in {
-def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt),
+def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2),
                            "#ADJCALLSTACKDOWN",
-                           [(X86callseq_start timm:$amt)]>,
+                           []>,
                           Requires<[NotLP64]>;
 def ADJCALLSTACKUP32   : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2),
                            "#ADJCALLSTACKUP",
                            [(X86callseq_end timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>,
                           Requires<[NotLP64]>;
 }
+def : Pat<(X86callseq_start timm:$amt1),
+          (ADJCALLSTACKDOWN32 i32imm:$amt1, 0)>, Requires<[NotLP64]>;
+
 
 // ADJCALLSTACKDOWN/UP implicitly use/def RSP because they may be expanded into
 // a stack adjustment and the codegen must know that they may modify the stack
@@ -59,16 +62,17 @@ def ADJCALLSTACKUP32   : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2),
 // Pessimistically assume ADJCALLSTACKDOWN / ADJCALLSTACKUP will become
 // sub / add which can clobber EFLAGS.
 let Defs = [RSP, EFLAGS], Uses = [RSP] in {
-def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt),
+def ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2),
                            "#ADJCALLSTACKDOWN",
-                           [(X86callseq_start timm:$amt)]>,
+                           []>,
                           Requires<[IsLP64]>;
 def ADJCALLSTACKUP64   : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins i32imm:$amt1, i32imm:$amt2),
                            "#ADJCALLSTACKUP",
                            [(X86callseq_end timm:$amt1, timm:$amt2)]>,
                           Requires<[IsLP64]>;
 }
-
+def : Pat<(X86callseq_start timm:$amt1),
+          (ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 i32imm:$amt1, 0)>, Requires<[IsLP64]>;
 
 
 // x86-64 va_start lowering magic.
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
index 4615693..6b6b8ae 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
@@ -1692,6 +1692,58 @@ X86InstrInfo::isCoalescableExtInstr(const MachineInstr &MI,
   return false;
 }
 
+int X86InstrInfo::getSPAdjust(const MachineInstr *MI) const {
+  const MachineFunction *MF = MI->getParent()->getParent();
+  const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF->getSubtarget().getFrameLowering();
+
+  if (MI->getOpcode() == getCallFrameSetupOpcode() ||
+      MI->getOpcode() == getCallFrameDestroyOpcode()) {
+    unsigned StackAlign = TFI->getStackAlignment();
+    int SPAdj = (MI->getOperand(0).getImm() + StackAlign - 1) / StackAlign * 
+                 StackAlign;
+
+    SPAdj -= MI->getOperand(1).getImm();
+
+    if (MI->getOpcode() == getCallFrameSetupOpcode())
+      return SPAdj;
+    else
+      return -SPAdj;
+  }
+  
+  // To know whether a call adjusts the stack, we need information 
+  // that is bound to the following ADJCALLSTACKUP pseudo.
+  // Look for the next ADJCALLSTACKUP that follows the call.
+  if (MI->isCall()) {
+    const MachineBasicBlock* MBB = MI->getParent();
+    auto I = ++MachineBasicBlock::const_iterator(MI);
+    for (auto E = MBB->end(); I != E; ++I) {
+      if (I->getOpcode() == getCallFrameDestroyOpcode() ||
+          I->isCall())
+        break;
+    }
+
+    // If we could not find a frame destroy opcode, then it has already
+    // been simplified, so we don't care.
+    if (I->getOpcode() != getCallFrameDestroyOpcode())
+      return 0;
+
+    return -(I->getOperand(1).getImm());
+  }
+
+  // Currently handle only PUSHes we can reasonably expect to see
+  // in call sequences
+  switch (MI->getOpcode()) {
+  default: 
+    return 0;
+  case X86::PUSH32i8:
+  case X86::PUSH32r:
+  case X86::PUSH32rmm:
+  case X86::PUSH32rmr:
+  case X86::PUSHi32:
+    return 4;
+  }
+}
+
 /// isFrameOperand - Return true and the FrameIndex if the specified
 /// operand and follow operands form a reference to the stack frame.
 bool X86InstrInfo::isFrameOperand(const MachineInstr *MI, unsigned int Op,
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.h b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.h
index 5662e86..4d15467 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.h
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.h
@@ -175,6 +175,11 @@ public:
   ///
   const X86RegisterInfo &getRegisterInfo() const { return RI; }
 
+  /// getSPAdjust - This returns the stack pointer adjustment made by
+  /// this instruction. For x86, we need to handle more complex call
+  /// sequences involving PUSHes.
+  int getSPAdjust(const MachineInstr *MI) const override;
+
   /// isCoalescableExtInstr - Return true if the instruction is a "coalescable"
   /// extension instruction. That is, it's like a copy where it's legal for the
   /// source to overlap the destination. e.g. X86::MOVSX64rr32. If this returns
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h
index b23a744..9fd03a7 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MachineFunctionInfo.h
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ class X86MachineFunctionInfo : public MachineFunctionInfo {
   unsigned ArgumentStackSize;
   /// NumLocalDynamics - Number of local-dynamic TLS accesses.
   unsigned NumLocalDynamics;
+  /// HasPushSequences - Keeps track of whether this function uses sequences
+  /// of pushes to pass function parameters.
+  bool HasPushSequences;
 
 private:
   /// ForwardedMustTailRegParms - A list of virtual and physical registers
@@ -97,7 +100,8 @@ public:
                              VarArgsGPOffset(0),
                              VarArgsFPOffset(0),
                              ArgumentStackSize(0),
-                             NumLocalDynamics(0) {}
+                             NumLocalDynamics(0),
+                             HasPushSequences(false) {}
 
   explicit X86MachineFunctionInfo(MachineFunction &MF)
     : ForceFramePointer(false),
@@ -113,11 +117,15 @@ public:
       VarArgsGPOffset(0),
       VarArgsFPOffset(0),
       ArgumentStackSize(0),
-      NumLocalDynamics(0) {}
+      NumLocalDynamics(0),
+      HasPushSequences(false) {}
 
   bool getForceFramePointer() const { return ForceFramePointer;}
   void setForceFramePointer(bool forceFP) { ForceFramePointer = forceFP; }
 
+  bool getHasPushSequences() const { return HasPushSequences; }
+  void setHasPushSequences(bool HasPush) { HasPushSequences = HasPush; }
+
   bool getRestoreBasePointer() const { return RestoreBasePointerOffset!=0; }
   void setRestoreBasePointer(const MachineFunction *MF);
   int getRestoreBasePointerOffset() const {return RestoreBasePointerOffset; }
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp
index 09e651c..0fa38f4 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp
@@ -468,8 +468,6 @@ void
 X86RegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
                                      int SPAdj, unsigned FIOperandNum,
                                      RegScavenger *RS) const {
-  assert(SPAdj == 0 && "Unexpected");
-
   MachineInstr &MI = *II;
   MachineFunction &MF = *MI.getParent()->getParent();
   const TargetFrameLowering *TFI = MF.getSubtarget().getFrameLowering();
@@ -506,6 +504,9 @@ X86RegisterInfo::eliminateFrameIndex(MachineBasicBlock::iterator II,
   } else
     FIOffset = TFI->getFrameIndexOffset(MF, FrameIndex);
 
+  if (BasePtr == StackPtr)
+    FIOffset += SPAdj;
+
   // The frame index format for stackmaps and patchpoints is different from the
   // X86 format. It only has a FI and an offset.
   if (Opc == TargetOpcode::STACKMAP || Opc == TargetOpcode::PATCHPOINT) {
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
index 5e6aa7d..1fc6b20 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86TargetMachine.cpp
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ public:
   void addIRPasses() override;
   bool addInstSelector() override;
   bool addILPOpts() override;
+  void addPreRegAlloc() override;
   void addPostRegAlloc() override;
   void addPreEmitPass() override;
 };
@@ -187,6 +188,10 @@ bool X86PassConfig::addILPOpts() {
   return true;
 }
 
+void X86PassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() {
+  addPass(createX86CallFrameOptimization());
+}
+
 void X86PassConfig::addPostRegAlloc() {
   addPass(createX86FloatingPointStackifierPass());
 }