| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I72471ac68088cd26f8277b27b75b7d44ad72cfc4
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5642
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This feature is no longer specific to ChromeOS builds.
Change-Id: If27d4dc7caff8a551b5b325cdebdd05c079ec921
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5641
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A global flag oprom_is_loaded was used to indicate to
U-boot that VGA option ROM was loaded and run, or that
native VGA init was completed on GMA device.
Implement this feature without dependency to CHROMEOS option
and replace use of global variable oprom_is_loaded with call
to gfx_get_init_done().
Change-Id: I7e1afd752f18e5346dabdee62e4f7ea08ada5faf
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4309
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the implementation for recovery and developer modes from
vendorcode/google/chromes to lib/.
Change-Id: I33335fb282de2c7bc613dc58d6912c47f3b5c06c
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4308
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needed types were being guarded by CONFIG_CHROMEOS_RAMOOPS.
Expose those unconditionally.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: Ie858c746307ad3669eab5c35bf219e1a58da2382
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/188714
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5453
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixing the location of the ram oops buffer can lead to certain
kernel and boot loaders being confused when there is a ram
reservation low in the address space. Alternatively provide
a mechanism to allocate the ram oops buffer in cbmem. As cbmem
is usually high in the address space it avoids low reservation
confusion.
The patch uncondtionally provides a GOOG9999 ACPI device with
a single memory resource describing the memory region used for
the ramoops region.
BUG=None
BRANCH=baytrail,haswell
TEST=Built and booted with and w/o dynamic ram oops. With
the corresponding kernel change things behave correctly.
Change-Id: Ide2bb4434768c9f9b90e125adae4324cb1d2d073
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5257
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A payload can be loaded either from a vboot region or from cbfs.
Provide a common place for choosing where the payload is loaded
from. Additionally, place the logic in the 'loaders' directory
similarly to the ramstage loader infrastructure.
Change-Id: I6b0034ea5ebd04a3d058151819ac77a126a6bfe2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5296
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are 2 methods currently available in coreboot to load
ramstage from romstage: cbfs and vboot. The vboot path had
to be explicitly enabled and code needed to be added to
each chipset to support both. Additionally, many of the paths
were duplicated between the two. An additional complication
is the presence of having a relocatable ramstage which creates
another path with duplication.
To rectify this situation provide a common API through the
use of a callback to load the ramstage. The rest of the
existing logic to handle all the various cases is put in
a common place.
Change-Id: I5268ce70686cc0d121161a775c3a86ea38a4d8ae
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5087
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the case of CONFIG_VBOOT_VERIFY_FIRMWARE not being
selected allow for calling vboot_verify_firmware()
with an empty implementation. This allows for one not to
clutter the source with ifdefs.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:23249
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built with a !CONFIG_VBOOT_VERIFY_FIRMWARE and non-guarded
call to vboot_verify_firmware().
Change-Id: I72af717ede3c5d1db2a1f8e586fefcca82b191d5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/172711
Reviewed-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4879
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As some of the standard definitions were shuffled around
chromeos started failing to build. Correct this.
Change-Id: I9927441ccb2d646e8b3395e6e9f8e8166de74ab0
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4844
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Number one reason to use cbfs_get_file was to get file length.
With previous patch no more need for this.
Change-Id: I330dda914d800c991757c5967b11963276ba9e00
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4674
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The vboot_handoff structure contians the VbInitParams as well as the
shared vboot data. In order for the boot loader to find it, the
structure address and size needs to be obtained from the coreboot
tables.
Change-Id: I6573d479009ccbf373a7325f861bebe8dc9f5cf8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2857
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements support for vboot firmware selection. The vboot
support is comprised of the following pieces:
1. vboot_loader.c - this file contains the entry point,
vboot_verify_firmware(), for romstage to call in order to perform
vboot selection. The loader sets up all the data for the wrapper
to use.
2. vboot_wrapper.c - this file contains the implementation calling the vboot
API. It calls VbInit() and VbSelectFirmware() with the data supplied
by the loader.
The vboot wrapper is compiled and linked as an rmodule and placed in
cbfs as 'fallback/vboot'. It's loaded into memory and relocated just
like the way ramstage would be. After being loaded the loader calls into
wrapper. When the wrapper sees that a given piece of firmware has been
selected it parses firmware component information for a predetermined
number of components.
Vboot result information is passed to downstream users by way of the
vboot_handoff structure. This structure lives in cbmem and contains
the shared data, selected firmware, VbInitParams, and parsed firwmare
components.
During ramstage there are only 2 changes:
1. Copy the shared vboot data from vboot_handoff to the chromeos acpi
table.
2. If a firmware selection was made in romstage the boot loader
component is used for the payload.
Noteable Information:
- no vboot path for S3.
- assumes that all RW firmware contains a book keeping header for the
components that comprise the signed firmware area.
- As sanity check there is a limit to the number of firmware components
contained in a signed firmware area. That's so that an errant value
doesn't cause the size calculation to erroneously read memory it
shouldn't.
- RO normal path isn't supported. It's assumed that firmware will always
load the verified RW on all boots but recovery.
- If vboot requests memory to be cleared it is assumed that the boot
loader will take care of that by looking at the out flags in
VbInitParams.
Built and booted. Noted firmware select worked on an image with
RW firmware support. Also checked that recovery mode worked as well
by choosing the RO path.
Change-Id: I45de725c44ee5b766f866692a20881c42ee11fa8
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2854
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This prepares the way for vboot to inform coreboot when it needs the VGA
Option ROM loaded. Coreboot can't always know when it's needed (with
keyboard-based dev-mode, coreboot can't tell if we're in dev-mode or not).
By the time we get to U-Boot, it's too late, so we need two extra bits - one
for vboot to tell coreboot to load the Option ROM and another for coreboot
to let vboot know it's been done.
This change sets up the communication, but doesn't act on it just yet.
Even with this CL we always load the VGA Option ROM, so there's nothing to
test. There should be no user-visible change.
Change-Id: Ic4e9673a3707b6605064f4879bb3e74d4412322f
Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1822
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Google's ChromeOS can be booted super fast and safely
using coreboot. This adds the ChromeOS specific code that
is required by all ChromeBooks to do this.
Change-Id: Ic03ff090a569a27acbd798ce1e5f89a34897a2f2
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/817
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|