1 files changed, 0 insertions, 82 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 0a0e064..0000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0001-PR-ld-13470.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
-From 82fdddd1c4e37881db9b4c6a944261521c6f10ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 00:57:59 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] 	PR ld/13470 	* elf32-ppc.c
- (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive 
- change in 2011-07-01 commit.  Comment. 	*
- elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
-
----
- bfd/ChangeLog   |    7 +++++++
- bfd/elf32-ppc.c |   14 ++++++++++----
- bfd/elf64-ppc.c |   14 ++++++++++----
- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
-
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
-Index: binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
-===================================================================
---- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2011-11-21 01:29:21.000000000 -0800
-+++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf32-ppc.c	2012-05-31 14:28:48.273784929 -0700
-@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@
-   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
-   edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
- 
--  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
--  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
--    return;
--
-   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-     {
-       if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@
-       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
-     }
- 
-+  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
-+     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
-+     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
-+     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
-+     code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
-+     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
-+     DIR sym here.  */
-+  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
-+    return;
-+
-   /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
-      the symbol which just became indirect.  */
-   edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
-Index: binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
-===================================================================
---- binutils-2.22.orig/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2011-11-21 01:29:24.000000000 -0800
-+++ binutils-2.22/bfd/elf64-ppc.c	2012-05-31 14:28:48.285784951 -0700
-@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@
-   edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
-   edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
- 
--  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.  */
--  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
--    return;
--
-   /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym.  */
-   if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
-     {
-@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@
-       eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
-     }
- 
-+  /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
-+     You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over;  After all,
-+     both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
-+     moving reloc accounting around.  However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS 
-+     code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
-+     dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
-+     DIR sym here.  */
-+  if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
-+    return;
-+
-   /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
-      symbol which just became indirect.  */
-   if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)