summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorScott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com>2013-03-27 08:11:41 -0700
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2013-04-04 14:12:52 +0100
commitcf6887d91485ffbf6f94978627296234a2d37a5f (patch)
tree937e51a4dec165278b45a9b947b9ea28babde226 /documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml
parent30cdf93d0c3791a2463f99963daf253f3d093fb1 (diff)
downloadast2050-yocto-poky-cf6887d91485ffbf6f94978627296234a2d37a5f.zip
ast2050-yocto-poky-cf6887d91485ffbf6f94978627296234a2d37a5f.tar.gz
ref-manual: rewrite of license flags matching section.
This whole section was very complicated and difficult to follow. I have rewritten it to clear it up. (From yocto-docs rev: 6ad1828eaa3e91b850696590cc732485a52f4cb6) Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml')
-rw-r--r--documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml156
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 73 deletions
diff --git a/documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml b/documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml
index d66d705..58a6b53 100644
--- a/documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml
+++ b/documentation/ref-manual/technical-details.xml
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
<para>
This chapter provides technical details for various parts of the Yocto Project.
- Currently, topics include Yocto Project components,
+ Currently, topics include Yocto Project components,
shared state (sstate) cache, x32, and Licenses.
</para>
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
<para>
The BitBake task executor together with various types of configuration files form the
OpenEmbedded Core.
- This section overviews these by describing what they are used for
+ This section overviews these by describing what they are used for
and how they interact.
</para>
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@
<title>Classes</title>
<para>
- Class files (<filename>.bbclass</filename>) contain information that
- is useful to share between
+ Class files (<filename>.bbclass</filename>) contain information that
+ is useful to share between
<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#metadata'>Metadata</ulink> files.
An example is the Autotools class, which contains
common settings for any application that Autotools uses.
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
Information based on direct inputs is referred to as the "basehash" in the
code.
However, there is still the question of a task's indirect inputs - the
- things that were already built and present in the
+ things that were already built and present in the
<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#build-directory'>Build Directory</ulink>.
The checksum (or signature) for a particular task needs to add the hashes
of all the tasks on which the particular task depends.
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
</literallayout>
The "OEBasicHash" <filename>BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER</filename> is the same as the
"OEBasic" version but adds the task hash to the stamp files.
- This results in any
+ This results in any
<ulink url='&YOCTO_DOCS_DEV_URL;#metadata'>Metadata</ulink>
change that changes the task hash, automatically
causing the task to be run again.
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@
information in the file.
If you specify two files, BitBake compares the two files and dumps out
the differences between the two.
- This more easily helps answer the question of "What
+ This more easily helps answer the question of "What
changed between X and Y?"</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
@@ -560,9 +560,9 @@
into the checksum calculation, but do affect a task's output.
A good example is perhaps when a tool changes its output.
Assume that the output of <filename>rpmdeps</filename> needed to change.
- The result of the change should be that all the
+ The result of the change should be that all the
<filename>package</filename>, <filename>package_write_rpm</filename>,
- and <filename>package_deploy-rpm</filename> shared state cache
+ and <filename>package_deploy-rpm</filename> shared state cache
items would become invalid.
But, because this is a change that is external to the code and therefore implicit,
the associated shared state cache items do not become invalidated.
@@ -780,8 +780,8 @@
of <filename><link linkend='var-S'>S</link></filename>.
</para>
<para>
- Note that <filename>LIC_FILES_CHKSUM</filename> variable is
- mandatory for all recipes, unless the
+ Note that <filename>LIC_FILES_CHKSUM</filename> variable is
+ mandatory for all recipes, unless the
<filename>LICENSE</filename> variable is set to "CLOSED".
</para>
</section>
@@ -902,94 +902,104 @@
<title>License Flag Matching</title>
<para>
- In general, license flag matching is simple.
- However, understanding some concepts will help you
+ License flag matching allows you to control what recipes the
+ OpenEmbedded build system includes in the build.
+ Fundamentally, the build system attempts to match
+ <filename>LICENSE_FLAG</filename> strings found in
+ recipes against <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST</filename>
+ strings found in the whitelist.
+ A match, causes the build system to include a recipe in the
+ build, while failure to find a match causes the build system to
+ exclued a recipe.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In general, license flag matching is simple.
+ However, understanding some concepts will help you
correctly and effectively use matching.
</para>
<para>
Before a flag
defined by a particular recipe is tested against the
- contents of the <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST</filename> variable, the
- expanded string <filename>_${PN}</filename> is
- appended to the flag.
- This expansion makes each <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename>
+ contents of the whitelist, the expanded string
+ <filename>_${PN}</filename> is appended to the flag.
+ This expansion makes each <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename>
value recipe-specific.
- After expansion, the string is then matched against the
+ After expansion, the string is then matched against the
whitelist.
- Thus, specifying <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial"</filename>
- in recipe "foo" for example, results in the string
+ Thus, specifying
+ <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial"</filename>
+ in recipe "foo", for example, results in the string
<filename>"commercial_foo"</filename>.
- And that string would normally be appears in the whitelist
- in order for a match to occur.
+ And, to create a match, that string must appear in the
+ whitelist.
</para>
<para>
- Judicious use of the <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename>
- strings and the contents of the
+ Judicious use of the <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename>
+ strings and the contents of the
<filename>LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST</filename> variable
- allows you a lot of flexibility for matching license
- flags.
- For example, you can broaden the matching capabilities by
- using string subsets from the <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename>
- variables in the whitelist.
- <note>Be sure to use the part of the expanded
- string that precedes
- the underscore character (e.g.
- <filename>usethispart_1.3</filename>,
+ allows you a lot of flexibility for including or excluding
+ recipes based on licensing.
+ For example, you can broaden the matching capabilities by
+ using license flags string subsets in the whitelist.
+ <note>When using a string subset, be sure to use the part of
+ the expanded string that precedes the appended underscore
+ character (e.g. <filename>usethispart_1.3</filename>,
<filename>usethispart_1.4</filename>, and so forth).
</note>
For example, simply specifying the string "commercial" in
- the whitelist matches any expanded
- <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename> definition that starts with
- the string "commercial" such as "commercial_foo" and
- "commercial_bar", which are the strings the build system
+ the whitelist matches any expanded
+ <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename> definition that starts with
+ the string "commercial" such as "commercial_foo" and
+ "commercial_bar", which are the strings the build system
automatically generates for hypothetical recipes named
- "foo" and "bar" assuming those recipes simply specify the
+ "foo" and "bar" assuming those recipes simply specify the
following:
<literallayout class='monospaced'>
LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial"
</literallayout>
+ Thus, you can choose to exhaustively
+ enumerate each license flag in the whitelist and
+ allow only specific recipes into the image, or
+ you can use a string subset that causes a broader range of
+ matches to allow a range of recipes into the image.
</para>
<para>
- Judicious use of the strings with the
- <filename>LICENSE_FLAGS</filename> variable and the Broadening the match allows for a range of specificity for the
- items in the whitelist, from more general to perfectly
- specific.
- So you have the choice of exhaustively
- enumerating each license flag in the whitelist to
- allow only those specific recipes into the image, or
- of using a more general string to pick up anything
- matching just the first component or components of the specified
- string.
+ This scheme works even if the
+ <filename>LICENSE_FLAG</filename> string already
+ has <filename>_${PN}</filename> appended.
+ For example, the build system turns the license flag
+ "commercial_1.2_foo" into "commercial_1.2_foo_foo" and would
+ match both the general "commercial" and the specific
+ "commercial_1.2_foo" strings found in the whitelist, as
+ expected.
</para>
<para>
- This scheme works even if the flag already
- has <filename>_${PN}</filename> appended - the extra <filename>_${PN}</filename> is
- redundant, but does not affect the outcome.
- For example, a license flag of "commercial_1.2_foo" would
- turn into "commercial_1.2_foo_foo" and would match
- both the general "commercial" and the specific
- "commercial_1.2_foo", as expected.
- The flag would also match
- "commercial_1.2_foo_foo" and "commercial_1.2", which
- does not make much sense regarding use in the whitelist.
- </para>
-
- <para>
- For a versioned string, you could instead specify
- "commercial_foo_1.2", which would turn into
- "commercial_foo_1.2_foo".
- And, as expected, this flag allows
- you to pick up this package along with
- anything else "commercial" when you specify "commercial"
- in the whitelist.
- Or, the flag allows you to pick up this package along with anything "commercial_foo"
- regardless of version when you use "commercial_foo" in the whitelist.
- Finally, you can be completely specific about the package and version and specify
- "commercial_foo_1.2" package and version.
+ Here are some other scenarios:
+ <itemizedlist>
+ <listitem><para>You can specify a versioned string in the
+ recipe such as "commercial_foo_1.2" in a "foo" recipe.
+ The build system expands this string to
+ "commercial_foo_1.2_foo".
+ Combine this license flag with a whitelist that has
+ the string "commercial" and you match the flag along
+ with any other flag that starts with the string
+ "commercial".</para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>Under the same circumstances, you can
+ use "commercial_foo" in the whitelist and the
+ build system not only matches "commercial_foo_1.2" but
+ also matches any license flag with the string
+ "commercial_foo", regardless of the version.
+ </para></listitem>
+ <listitem><para>You can be very specific and use both the
+ package and version parts in the whitelist (e.g.
+ "commercial_foo_1.2") to specifically match a
+ versioned recipe.</para></listitem>
+ </itemizedlist>
</para>
</section>
@@ -1006,7 +1016,7 @@
COMMERCIAL_QT = ""
</literallayout>
If you want to enable these components, you can do so by making sure you have
- statements similar to the following
+ statements similar to the following
in your <filename>local.conf</filename> configuration file:
<literallayout class='monospaced'>
COMMERCIAL_AUDIO_PLUGINS = "gst-plugins-ugly-mad \
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud