Correct and improve the description of le(4) vs. pcn(4); apparently I

was thinking from the pcn(4) perspective instead of the le(4) one when
writing the former version as le(4) supports a superset of the chips
supported by pcn(4) and not the other way round.

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/share/man/man4/le.4 b/share/man/man4/le.4
index 829b805..ad4e419 100644
--- a/share/man/man4/le.4
+++ b/share/man/man4/le.4
@@ -79,17 +79,24 @@ driver also supports PCnet adapters based on the
 .Tn AMD 79C9xx
 family of chips, which are single-chip implementations of a
 .Tn LANCE
-chip and
+chip and a DMA engine.
+This includes a superset of the
 .Tn PCI
-bus interface.
-This includes most of the adapters which are also supported by the
+bus Ethernet chip sets supported by the
 .Xr pcn 4
 driver.
 The
 .Nm
-driver does not support all features of these adapters however, thus the
+driver treats all of these
+.Tn PCI
+bus Ethernet chip sets as an
+.Tn AMD Am79C970 PCnet-PCI
+and does not support the additional features like the MII bus and burst mode of
+.Tn AMD Am79C971 PCnet-FAST
+and greater chip sets.
+Thus the
 .Xr pcn 4
-driver should be preferred.
+driver should be preferred for the latter.
 .Pp
 The
 .Nm