Update clang to r84119.

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseInit.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseInit.cpp
index bbc2124..6ab23fd 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseInit.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseInit.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ using namespace clang;
 
 /// MayBeDesignationStart - Return true if this token might be the start of a
 /// designator.  If we can tell it is impossible that it is a designator, return
-/// false. 
+/// false.
 static bool MayBeDesignationStart(tok::TokenKind K, Preprocessor &PP) {
   switch (K) {
   default: return false;
@@ -70,46 +70,46 @@ Parser::OwningExprResult Parser::ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator() {
     NewSyntax += " = ";
 
     SourceLocation NameLoc = ConsumeToken(); // Eat the identifier.
-    
+
     assert(Tok.is(tok::colon) && "MayBeDesignationStart not working properly!");
     SourceLocation ColonLoc = ConsumeToken();
 
     Diag(Tok, diag::ext_gnu_old_style_field_designator)
-      << CodeModificationHint::CreateReplacement(SourceRange(NameLoc, 
+      << CodeModificationHint::CreateReplacement(SourceRange(NameLoc,
                                                              ColonLoc),
                                                  NewSyntax);
 
     Designation D;
     D.AddDesignator(Designator::getField(FieldName, SourceLocation(), NameLoc));
-    return Actions.ActOnDesignatedInitializer(D, ColonLoc, true, 
+    return Actions.ActOnDesignatedInitializer(D, ColonLoc, true,
                                               ParseInitializer());
   }
-  
+
   // Desig - This is initialized when we see our first designator.  We may have
   // an objc message send with no designator, so we don't want to create this
   // eagerly.
   Designation Desig;
-  
+
   // Parse each designator in the designator list until we find an initializer.
   while (Tok.is(tok::period) || Tok.is(tok::l_square)) {
     if (Tok.is(tok::period)) {
       // designator: '.' identifier
       SourceLocation DotLoc = ConsumeToken();
-      
+
       if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier)) {
         Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_expected_field_designator);
         return ExprError();
       }
-      
+
       Desig.AddDesignator(Designator::getField(Tok.getIdentifierInfo(), DotLoc,
                                                Tok.getLocation()));
       ConsumeToken(); // Eat the identifier.
       continue;
     }
-    
+
     // We must have either an array designator now or an objc message send.
     assert(Tok.is(tok::l_square) && "Unexpected token!");
-    
+
     // Handle the two forms of array designator:
     //   array-designator: '[' constant-expression ']'
     //   array-designator: '[' constant-expression '...' constant-expression ']'
@@ -123,14 +123,14 @@ Parser::OwningExprResult Parser::ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator() {
     //   [4][foo bar]      -> obsolete GNU designation with objc message send.
     //
     SourceLocation StartLoc = ConsumeBracket();
-    
+
     // If Objective-C is enabled and this is a typename or other identifier
     // receiver, parse this as a message send expression.
     if (getLang().ObjC1 && isTokObjCMessageIdentifierReceiver()) {
       // If we have exactly one array designator, this used the GNU
       // 'designation: array-designator' extension, otherwise there should be no
       // designators at all!
-      if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 && 
+      if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 &&
           (Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayDesignator() ||
            Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayRangeDesignator()))
         Diag(StartLoc, diag::ext_gnu_missing_equal_designator);
@@ -151,18 +151,18 @@ Parser::OwningExprResult Parser::ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator() {
       SkipUntil(tok::r_square);
       return move(Idx);
     }
-    
+
     // Given an expression, we could either have a designator (if the next
     // tokens are '...' or ']' or an objc message send.  If this is an objc
-    // message send, handle it now.  An objc-message send is the start of 
+    // message send, handle it now.  An objc-message send is the start of
     // an assignment-expression production.
-    if (getLang().ObjC1 && Tok.isNot(tok::ellipsis) && 
+    if (getLang().ObjC1 && Tok.isNot(tok::ellipsis) &&
         Tok.isNot(tok::r_square)) {
-      
+
       // If we have exactly one array designator, this used the GNU
       // 'designation: array-designator' extension, otherwise there should be no
       // designators at all!
-      if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 && 
+      if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 &&
           (Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayDesignator() ||
            Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayRangeDesignator()))
         Diag(StartLoc, diag::ext_gnu_missing_equal_designator);
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ Parser::OwningExprResult Parser::ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator() {
   // an initializer.  If we have exactly one array designator, this
   // is the GNU 'designation: array-designator' extension.  Otherwise, it is a
   // parse error.
-  if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 && 
+  if (Desig.getNumDesignators() == 1 &&
       (Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayDesignator() ||
        Desig.getDesignator(0).isArrayRangeDesignator())) {
     Diag(Tok, diag::ext_gnu_missing_equal_designator)
@@ -267,13 +267,13 @@ Parser::OwningExprResult Parser::ParseBraceInitializer() {
       SubElt = ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator();
     else
       SubElt = ParseInitializer();
-    
+
     // If we couldn't parse the subelement, bail out.
     if (!SubElt.isInvalid()) {
       InitExprs.push_back(SubElt.release());
     } else {
       InitExprsOk = false;
-      
+
       // We have two ways to try to recover from this error: if the code looks
       // gramatically ok (i.e. we have a comma coming up) try to continue
       // parsing the rest of the initializer.  This allows us to emit