Merge clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ 5.0.0 release.

MFC r309126 (by emaste):

  Correct lld llvm-tblgen dependency file name

MFC r309169:

  Get rid of separate Subversion mergeinfo properties for llvm-dwarfdump
  and llvm-lto.  The mergeinfo confuses Subversion enormously, and these
  directories will just use the mergeinfo for llvm itself.

MFC r312765:

  Pull in r276136 from upstream llvm trunk (by Wei Mi):

    Use ValueOffsetPair to enhance value reuse during SCEV expansion.

    In D12090, the ExprValueMap was added to reuse existing value during
    SCEV expansion. However, const folding and sext/zext distribution can
    make the reuse still difficult.

    A simplified case is: suppose we know S1 expands to V1 in
    ExprValueMap, and
      S1 = S2 + C_a
      S3 = S2 + C_b
    where C_a and C_b are different SCEVConstants. Then we'd like to
    expand S3 as V1 - C_a + C_b instead of expanding S2 literally. It is
    helpful when S2 is a complex SCEV expr and S2 has no entry in
    ExprValueMap, which is usually caused by the fact that S3 is
    generated from S1 after const folding.

    In order to do that, we represent ExprValueMap as a mapping from SCEV
    to ValueOffsetPair. We will save both S1->{V1, 0} and S2->{V1, C_a}
    into the ExprValueMap when we create SCEV for V1. When S3 is
    expanded, it will first expand S2 to V1 - C_a because of S2->{V1,
    C_a} in the map, then expand S3 to V1 - C_a + C_b.

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313

  This should fix assertion failures when building OpenCV >= 3.1.

  PR:		215649

MFC r312831:

  Revert r312765 for now, since it causes assertions when building
  lang/spidermonkey24.

  Reported by:	antoine
  PR:		215649

MFC r316511 (by jhb):

  Add an implementation of __ffssi2() derived from __ffsdi2().

  Newer versions of GCC include an __ffssi2() symbol in libgcc and the
  compiler can emit calls to it in generated code.  This is true for at
  least GCC 6.2 when compiling world for mips and mips64.

  Reviewed by:	jmallett, dim
  Sponsored by:	DARPA / AFRL
  Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10086

MFC r318601 (by adrian):

  [libcompiler-rt] add bswapdi2/bswapsi2

  This is required for mips gcc 6.3 userland to build/run.

  Reviewed by:	emaste, dim
  Approved by:	emaste
  Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10838

MFC r318884 (by emaste):

  lldb: map TRAP_CAP to a trace trap

  In the absense of a more specific handler for TRAP_CAP (generated by
  ENOTCAPABLE or ECAPMODE while in capability mode) treat it as a trace
  trap.

  Example usage (testing the bug in PR219173):

  % proccontrol -m trapcap lldb usr.bin/hexdump/obj/hexdump -- -Cv -s 1 /bin/ls
  ...
  (lldb) run
  Process 12980 launching
  Process 12980 launched: '.../usr.bin/hexdump/obj/hexdump' (x86_64)
  Process 12980 stopped
  * thread #1, stop reason = trace
      frame #0: 0x0000004b80c65f1a libc.so.7`__sys_lseek + 10
  ...

  In the future we should have LLDB control the trapcap procctl itself
  (as it does with ASLR), as well as report a specific stop reason.
  This change eliminates an assertion failure from LLDB for now.

MFC r319796:

  Remove a few unneeded files from libllvm, libclang and liblldb.

MFC r319885 (by emaste):

  lld: ELF: Fix ICF crash on absolute symbol relocations.

  If two sections contained relocations to absolute symbols with the same
  value we would crash when trying to access their sections. Add a check that
  both symbols point to sections before accessing their sections, and treat
  absolute symbols as equal if their values are equal.

  Obtained from:	LLD commit r292578

MFC r319918:

  Revert r319796 for now, it can cause undefined references when linking
  in some circumstances.

  Reported by:	Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>

MFC r319957 (by emaste):

  lld: Add armelf emulation mode

  Obtained from:	LLD r305375

MFC r321369:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
  5.0.0 (trunk r308421).  Upstream has branched for the 5.0.0 release,
  which should be in about a month.  Please report bugs and regressions,
  so we can get them into the release.

  Please note that from 3.5.0 onwards, clang, llvm and lldb require C++11
  support to build; see UPDATING for more information.

MFC r321420:

  Add a few more object files to liblldb, which should solve errors when
  linking the lldb executable in some cases.  In particular, when the
  -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections options are turned off, or
  ineffective.

  Reported by:	Shawn Webb, Mark Millard

MFC r321433:

  Cleanup stale Options.inc files from the previous libllvm build for
  clang 4.0.0.  Otherwise, these can get included before the two newly
  generated ones (which are different) for clang 5.0.0.

  Reported by:	Mark Millard

MFC r321439 (by bdrewery):

  Move llvm Options.inc hack from r321433 for NO_CLEAN to lib/clang/libllvm.

  The files are only ever generated to .OBJDIR, not to WORLDTMP (as a
  sysroot) and are only ever included from a compilation.  So using
  a beforebuild target here removes the file before the compilation
  tries to include it.

MFC r321664:

  Pull in r308891 from upstream llvm trunk (by Benjamin Kramer):

    [CodeGenPrepare] Cut off FindAllMemoryUses if there are too many uses.

    This avoids excessive compile time. The case I'm looking at is
    Function.cpp from an old version of LLVM that still had the giant
    memcmp string matcher in it. Before r308322 this compiled in about 2
    minutes, after it, clang takes infinite* time to compile it. With
    this patch we're at 5 min, which is still bad but this is a
    pathological case.

    The cut off at 20 uses was chosen by looking at other cut-offs in LLVM
    for user scanning. It's probably too high, but does the job and is
    very unlikely to regress anything.

    Fixes PR33900.

    * I'm impatient and aborted after 15 minutes, on the bug report it was
      killed after 2h.

  Pull in r308986 from upstream llvm trunk (by Simon Pilgrim):

    [X86][CGP] Reduce memcmp() expansion to 2 load pairs (PR33914)

    D35067/rL308322 attempted to support up to 4 load pairs for memcmp
    inlining which resulted in regressions for some optimized libc memcmp
    implementations (PR33914).

    Until we can match these more optimal cases, this patch reduces the
    memcmp expansion to a maximum of 2 load pairs (which matches what we
    do for -Os).

    This patch should be considered for the 5.0.0 release branch as well

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35830

  These fix a hang (or extremely long compile time) when building older
  LLVM ports.

  Reported by:    antoine
  PR:             219139

MFC r321719:

  Pull in r309503 from upstream clang trunk (by Richard Smith):

    PR33902: Invalidate line number cache when adding more text to
    existing buffer.

    This led to crashes as the line number cache would report a bogus
    line number for a line of code, and we'd try to find a nonexistent
    column within the line when printing diagnostics.

  This fixes an assertion when building the graphics/champlain port.

  Reported by:	antoine, kwm
  PR:		219139

MFC r321723:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld and lldb to r309439 from the
  upstream release_50 branch.  This is just after upstream's 5.0.0-rc1.

MFC r322320:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm and libc++ to r310316 from the
  upstream release_50 branch.

MFC r322326 (by emaste):

  lldb: Make i386-*-freebsd expression work on JIT path

  * Enable i386 ABI creation for freebsd
  * Added an extra argument in ABISysV_i386::PrepareTrivialCall for mmap
    syscall
  * Unlike linux, the last argument of mmap is actually 64-bit(off_t).
    This requires us to push an additional word for the higher order bits.
  * Prior to this change, ktrace dump will show mmap failures due to
    invalid argument coming from the 6th mmap argument.

  Submitted by:	Karnajit Wangkhem
  Differential Revision:	https://reviews.llvm.org/D34776

MFC r322360 (by emaste):

  lldb: Report inferior signals as signals, not exceptions, on FreeBSD

  This is the FreeBSD equivalent of LLVM r238549.

  This serves 2 purposes:

  * LLDB should handle inferior process signals SIGSEGV/SIGILL/SIGBUS/
    SIGFPE the way it is suppose to be handled. Prior to this fix these
    signals will neither create a coredump, nor exit from the debugger
    or work for signal handling scenario.
  * eInvalidCrashReason need not report "unknown crash reason" if we have
    a valid si_signo

  llvm.org/pr23699

  Patch by Karnajit Wangkhem

  Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D35223

  Submitted by:	Karnajit Wangkhem
  Obtained from:	LLVM r310591

MFC r322474 (by emaste):

  lld: Add `-z muldefs` option.

  Obtained from:	LLVM r310757

MFC r322740:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld and libc++ to r311219 from the
  upstream release_50 branch.

MFC r322855:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lldb and compiler-rt to r311606 from
  the upstream release_50 branch.

  As of this version, lib/msun's trig test should also work correctly
  again (see bug 220989 for more information).

  PR:		220989

MFC r323112:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lldb and compiler-rt to r312293 from
  the upstream release_50 branch.  This corresponds to 5.0.0 rc4.

  As of this version, the cad/stepcode port should now compile in a more
  reasonable time on i386 (see bug 221836 for more information).

  PR:		221836

MFC r323245:

  Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
  5.0.0 release (upstream r312559).

  Release notes for llvm, clang and lld will be available here soon:
  <http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
  <http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
  <http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

  Relnotes:	yes

(cherry picked from commit 12cd91cf4c6b96a24427c0de5374916f2808d263)

1 files changed, 793 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d4cdaed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,793 @@
+//===-- PredicateInfo.cpp - PredicateInfo Builder--------------------===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file implements the PredicateInfo class.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/PredicateInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionCache.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/CFG.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/AssemblyAnnotationWriter.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/GlobalVariable.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Metadata.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
+#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/DebugCounter.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/FormattedStream.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/OrderedInstructions.h"
+#include <algorithm>
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "predicateinfo"
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace PatternMatch;
+using namespace llvm::PredicateInfoClasses;
+
+INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass, "print-predicateinfo",
+                      "PredicateInfo Printer", false, false)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(AssumptionCacheTracker)
+INITIALIZE_PASS_END(PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass, "print-predicateinfo",
+                    "PredicateInfo Printer", false, false)
+static cl::opt<bool> VerifyPredicateInfo(
+    "verify-predicateinfo", cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
+    cl::desc("Verify PredicateInfo in legacy printer pass."));
+namespace {
+DEBUG_COUNTER(RenameCounter, "predicateinfo-rename",
+              "Controls which variables are renamed with predicateinfo")
+// Given a predicate info that is a type of branching terminator, get the
+// branching block.
+const BasicBlock *getBranchBlock(const PredicateBase *PB) {
+  assert(isa<PredicateWithEdge>(PB) &&
+         "Only branches and switches should have PHIOnly defs that "
+         "require branch blocks.");
+  return cast<PredicateWithEdge>(PB)->From;
+}
+
+// Given a predicate info that is a type of branching terminator, get the
+// branching terminator.
+static Instruction *getBranchTerminator(const PredicateBase *PB) {
+  assert(isa<PredicateWithEdge>(PB) &&
+         "Not a predicate info type we know how to get a terminator from.");
+  return cast<PredicateWithEdge>(PB)->From->getTerminator();
+}
+
+// Given a predicate info that is a type of branching terminator, get the
+// edge this predicate info represents
+const std::pair<BasicBlock *, BasicBlock *>
+getBlockEdge(const PredicateBase *PB) {
+  assert(isa<PredicateWithEdge>(PB) &&
+         "Not a predicate info type we know how to get an edge from.");
+  const auto *PEdge = cast<PredicateWithEdge>(PB);
+  return std::make_pair(PEdge->From, PEdge->To);
+}
+}
+
+namespace llvm {
+namespace PredicateInfoClasses {
+enum LocalNum {
+  // Operations that must appear first in the block.
+  LN_First,
+  // Operations that are somewhere in the middle of the block, and are sorted on
+  // demand.
+  LN_Middle,
+  // Operations that must appear last in a block, like successor phi node uses.
+  LN_Last
+};
+
+// Associate global and local DFS info with defs and uses, so we can sort them
+// into a global domination ordering.
+struct ValueDFS {
+  int DFSIn = 0;
+  int DFSOut = 0;
+  unsigned int LocalNum = LN_Middle;
+  // Only one of Def or Use will be set.
+  Value *Def = nullptr;
+  Use *U = nullptr;
+  // Neither PInfo nor EdgeOnly participate in the ordering
+  PredicateBase *PInfo = nullptr;
+  bool EdgeOnly = false;
+};
+
+// Perform a strict weak ordering on instructions and arguments.
+static bool valueComesBefore(OrderedInstructions &OI, const Value *A,
+                             const Value *B) {
+  auto *ArgA = dyn_cast_or_null<Argument>(A);
+  auto *ArgB = dyn_cast_or_null<Argument>(B);
+  if (ArgA && !ArgB)
+    return true;
+  if (ArgB && !ArgA)
+    return false;
+  if (ArgA && ArgB)
+    return ArgA->getArgNo() < ArgB->getArgNo();
+  return OI.dominates(cast<Instruction>(A), cast<Instruction>(B));
+}
+
+// This compares ValueDFS structures, creating OrderedBasicBlocks where
+// necessary to compare uses/defs in the same block.  Doing so allows us to walk
+// the minimum number of instructions necessary to compute our def/use ordering.
+struct ValueDFS_Compare {
+  OrderedInstructions &OI;
+  ValueDFS_Compare(OrderedInstructions &OI) : OI(OI) {}
+
+  bool operator()(const ValueDFS &A, const ValueDFS &B) const {
+    if (&A == &B)
+      return false;
+    // The only case we can't directly compare them is when they in the same
+    // block, and both have localnum == middle.  In that case, we have to use
+    // comesbefore to see what the real ordering is, because they are in the
+    // same basic block.
+
+    bool SameBlock = std::tie(A.DFSIn, A.DFSOut) == std::tie(B.DFSIn, B.DFSOut);
+
+    // We want to put the def that will get used for a given set of phi uses,
+    // before those phi uses.
+    // So we sort by edge, then by def.
+    // Note that only phi nodes uses and defs can come last.
+    if (SameBlock && A.LocalNum == LN_Last && B.LocalNum == LN_Last)
+      return comparePHIRelated(A, B);
+
+    if (!SameBlock || A.LocalNum != LN_Middle || B.LocalNum != LN_Middle)
+      return std::tie(A.DFSIn, A.DFSOut, A.LocalNum, A.Def, A.U) <
+             std::tie(B.DFSIn, B.DFSOut, B.LocalNum, B.Def, B.U);
+    return localComesBefore(A, B);
+  }
+
+  // For a phi use, or a non-materialized def, return the edge it represents.
+  const std::pair<BasicBlock *, BasicBlock *>
+  getBlockEdge(const ValueDFS &VD) const {
+    if (!VD.Def && VD.U) {
+      auto *PHI = cast<PHINode>(VD.U->getUser());
+      return std::make_pair(PHI->getIncomingBlock(*VD.U), PHI->getParent());
+    }
+    // This is really a non-materialized def.
+    return ::getBlockEdge(VD.PInfo);
+  }
+
+  // For two phi related values, return the ordering.
+  bool comparePHIRelated(const ValueDFS &A, const ValueDFS &B) const {
+    auto &ABlockEdge = getBlockEdge(A);
+    auto &BBlockEdge = getBlockEdge(B);
+    // Now sort by block edge and then defs before uses.
+    return std::tie(ABlockEdge, A.Def, A.U) < std::tie(BBlockEdge, B.Def, B.U);
+  }
+
+  // Get the definition of an instruction that occurs in the middle of a block.
+  Value *getMiddleDef(const ValueDFS &VD) const {
+    if (VD.Def)
+      return VD.Def;
+    // It's possible for the defs and uses to be null.  For branches, the local
+    // numbering will say the placed predicaeinfos should go first (IE
+    // LN_beginning), so we won't be in this function. For assumes, we will end
+    // up here, beause we need to order the def we will place relative to the
+    // assume.  So for the purpose of ordering, we pretend the def is the assume
+    // because that is where we will insert the info.
+    if (!VD.U) {
+      assert(VD.PInfo &&
+             "No def, no use, and no predicateinfo should not occur");
+      assert(isa<PredicateAssume>(VD.PInfo) &&
+             "Middle of block should only occur for assumes");
+      return cast<PredicateAssume>(VD.PInfo)->AssumeInst;
+    }
+    return nullptr;
+  }
+
+  // Return either the Def, if it's not null, or the user of the Use, if the def
+  // is null.
+  const Instruction *getDefOrUser(const Value *Def, const Use *U) const {
+    if (Def)
+      return cast<Instruction>(Def);
+    return cast<Instruction>(U->getUser());
+  }
+
+  // This performs the necessary local basic block ordering checks to tell
+  // whether A comes before B, where both are in the same basic block.
+  bool localComesBefore(const ValueDFS &A, const ValueDFS &B) const {
+    auto *ADef = getMiddleDef(A);
+    auto *BDef = getMiddleDef(B);
+
+    // See if we have real values or uses. If we have real values, we are
+    // guaranteed they are instructions or arguments. No matter what, we are
+    // guaranteed they are in the same block if they are instructions.
+    auto *ArgA = dyn_cast_or_null<Argument>(ADef);
+    auto *ArgB = dyn_cast_or_null<Argument>(BDef);
+
+    if (ArgA || ArgB)
+      return valueComesBefore(OI, ArgA, ArgB);
+
+    auto *AInst = getDefOrUser(ADef, A.U);
+    auto *BInst = getDefOrUser(BDef, B.U);
+    return valueComesBefore(OI, AInst, BInst);
+  }
+};
+
+} // namespace PredicateInfoClasses
+
+bool PredicateInfo::stackIsInScope(const ValueDFSStack &Stack,
+                                   const ValueDFS &VDUse) const {
+  if (Stack.empty())
+    return false;
+  // If it's a phi only use, make sure it's for this phi node edge, and that the
+  // use is in a phi node.  If it's anything else, and the top of the stack is
+  // EdgeOnly, we need to pop the stack.  We deliberately sort phi uses next to
+  // the defs they must go with so that we can know it's time to pop the stack
+  // when we hit the end of the phi uses for a given def.
+  if (Stack.back().EdgeOnly) {
+    if (!VDUse.U)
+      return false;
+    auto *PHI = dyn_cast<PHINode>(VDUse.U->getUser());
+    if (!PHI)
+      return false;
+    // Check edge
+    BasicBlock *EdgePred = PHI->getIncomingBlock(*VDUse.U);
+    if (EdgePred != getBranchBlock(Stack.back().PInfo))
+      return false;
+
+    // Use dominates, which knows how to handle edge dominance.
+    return DT.dominates(getBlockEdge(Stack.back().PInfo), *VDUse.U);
+  }
+
+  return (VDUse.DFSIn >= Stack.back().DFSIn &&
+          VDUse.DFSOut <= Stack.back().DFSOut);
+}
+
+void PredicateInfo::popStackUntilDFSScope(ValueDFSStack &Stack,
+                                          const ValueDFS &VD) {
+  while (!Stack.empty() && !stackIsInScope(Stack, VD))
+    Stack.pop_back();
+}
+
+// Convert the uses of Op into a vector of uses, associating global and local
+// DFS info with each one.
+void PredicateInfo::convertUsesToDFSOrdered(
+    Value *Op, SmallVectorImpl<ValueDFS> &DFSOrderedSet) {
+  for (auto &U : Op->uses()) {
+    if (auto *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser())) {
+      ValueDFS VD;
+      // Put the phi node uses in the incoming block.
+      BasicBlock *IBlock;
+      if (auto *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I)) {
+        IBlock = PN->getIncomingBlock(U);
+        // Make phi node users appear last in the incoming block
+        // they are from.
+        VD.LocalNum = LN_Last;
+      } else {
+        // If it's not a phi node use, it is somewhere in the middle of the
+        // block.
+        IBlock = I->getParent();
+        VD.LocalNum = LN_Middle;
+      }
+      DomTreeNode *DomNode = DT.getNode(IBlock);
+      // It's possible our use is in an unreachable block. Skip it if so.
+      if (!DomNode)
+        continue;
+      VD.DFSIn = DomNode->getDFSNumIn();
+      VD.DFSOut = DomNode->getDFSNumOut();
+      VD.U = &U;
+      DFSOrderedSet.push_back(VD);
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// Collect relevant operations from Comparison that we may want to insert copies
+// for.
+void collectCmpOps(CmpInst *Comparison, SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &CmpOperands) {
+  auto *Op0 = Comparison->getOperand(0);
+  auto *Op1 = Comparison->getOperand(1);
+  if (Op0 == Op1)
+    return;
+  CmpOperands.push_back(Comparison);
+  // Only want real values, not constants.  Additionally, operands with one use
+  // are only being used in the comparison, which means they will not be useful
+  // for us to consider for predicateinfo.
+  //
+  if ((isa<Instruction>(Op0) || isa<Argument>(Op0)) && !Op0->hasOneUse())
+    CmpOperands.push_back(Op0);
+  if ((isa<Instruction>(Op1) || isa<Argument>(Op1)) && !Op1->hasOneUse())
+    CmpOperands.push_back(Op1);
+}
+
+// Add Op, PB to the list of value infos for Op, and mark Op to be renamed.
+void PredicateInfo::addInfoFor(SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &OpsToRename, Value *Op,
+                               PredicateBase *PB) {
+  OpsToRename.insert(Op);
+  auto &OperandInfo = getOrCreateValueInfo(Op);
+  AllInfos.push_back(PB);
+  OperandInfo.Infos.push_back(PB);
+}
+
+// Process an assume instruction and place relevant operations we want to rename
+// into OpsToRename.
+void PredicateInfo::processAssume(IntrinsicInst *II, BasicBlock *AssumeBB,
+                                  SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &OpsToRename) {
+  // See if we have a comparison we support
+  SmallVector<Value *, 8> CmpOperands;
+  SmallVector<Value *, 2> ConditionsToProcess;
+  CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
+  Value *Operand = II->getOperand(0);
+  if (m_c_And(m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value()),
+              m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value()))
+          .match(II->getOperand(0))) {
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(cast<BinaryOperator>(Operand)->getOperand(0));
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(cast<BinaryOperator>(Operand)->getOperand(1));
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(Operand);
+  } else if (isa<CmpInst>(Operand)) {
+
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(Operand);
+  }
+  for (auto Cond : ConditionsToProcess) {
+    if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(Cond)) {
+      collectCmpOps(Cmp, CmpOperands);
+      // Now add our copy infos for our operands
+      for (auto *Op : CmpOperands) {
+        auto *PA = new PredicateAssume(Op, II, Cmp);
+        addInfoFor(OpsToRename, Op, PA);
+      }
+      CmpOperands.clear();
+    } else if (auto *BinOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Cond)) {
+      // Otherwise, it should be an AND.
+      assert(BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::And &&
+             "Should have been an AND");
+      auto *PA = new PredicateAssume(BinOp, II, BinOp);
+      addInfoFor(OpsToRename, BinOp, PA);
+    } else {
+      llvm_unreachable("Unknown type of condition");
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// Process a block terminating branch, and place relevant operations to be
+// renamed into OpsToRename.
+void PredicateInfo::processBranch(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *BranchBB,
+                                  SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &OpsToRename) {
+  BasicBlock *FirstBB = BI->getSuccessor(0);
+  BasicBlock *SecondBB = BI->getSuccessor(1);
+  SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 2> SuccsToProcess;
+  SuccsToProcess.push_back(FirstBB);
+  SuccsToProcess.push_back(SecondBB);
+  SmallVector<Value *, 2> ConditionsToProcess;
+
+  auto InsertHelper = [&](Value *Op, bool isAnd, bool isOr, Value *Cond) {
+    for (auto *Succ : SuccsToProcess) {
+      // Don't try to insert on a self-edge. This is mainly because we will
+      // eliminate during renaming anyway.
+      if (Succ == BranchBB)
+        continue;
+      bool TakenEdge = (Succ == FirstBB);
+      // For and, only insert on the true edge
+      // For or, only insert on the false edge
+      if ((isAnd && !TakenEdge) || (isOr && TakenEdge))
+        continue;
+      PredicateBase *PB =
+          new PredicateBranch(Op, BranchBB, Succ, Cond, TakenEdge);
+      addInfoFor(OpsToRename, Op, PB);
+      if (!Succ->getSinglePredecessor())
+        EdgeUsesOnly.insert({BranchBB, Succ});
+    }
+  };
+
+  // Match combinations of conditions.
+  CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
+  bool isAnd = false;
+  bool isOr = false;
+  SmallVector<Value *, 8> CmpOperands;
+  if (match(BI->getCondition(), m_And(m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value()),
+                                      m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value()))) ||
+      match(BI->getCondition(), m_Or(m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value()),
+                                     m_Cmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Value())))) {
+    auto *BinOp = cast<BinaryOperator>(BI->getCondition());
+    if (BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::And)
+      isAnd = true;
+    else if (BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or)
+      isOr = true;
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(BinOp->getOperand(0));
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(BinOp->getOperand(1));
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(BI->getCondition());
+  } else if (isa<CmpInst>(BI->getCondition())) {
+    ConditionsToProcess.push_back(BI->getCondition());
+  }
+  for (auto Cond : ConditionsToProcess) {
+    if (auto *Cmp = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(Cond)) {
+      collectCmpOps(Cmp, CmpOperands);
+      // Now add our copy infos for our operands
+      for (auto *Op : CmpOperands)
+        InsertHelper(Op, isAnd, isOr, Cmp);
+    } else if (auto *BinOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Cond)) {
+      // This must be an AND or an OR.
+      assert((BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::And ||
+              BinOp->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or) &&
+             "Should have been an AND or an OR");
+      // The actual value of the binop is not subject to the same restrictions
+      // as the comparison. It's either true or false on the true/false branch.
+      InsertHelper(BinOp, false, false, BinOp);
+    } else {
+      llvm_unreachable("Unknown type of condition");
+    }
+    CmpOperands.clear();
+  }
+}
+// Process a block terminating switch, and place relevant operations to be
+// renamed into OpsToRename.
+void PredicateInfo::processSwitch(SwitchInst *SI, BasicBlock *BranchBB,
+                                  SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &OpsToRename) {
+  Value *Op = SI->getCondition();
+  if ((!isa<Instruction>(Op) && !isa<Argument>(Op)) || Op->hasOneUse())
+    return;
+
+  // Remember how many outgoing edges there are to every successor.
+  SmallDenseMap<BasicBlock *, unsigned, 16> SwitchEdges;
+  for (unsigned i = 0, e = SI->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i) {
+    BasicBlock *TargetBlock = SI->getSuccessor(i);
+    ++SwitchEdges[TargetBlock];
+  }
+
+  // Now propagate info for each case value
+  for (auto C : SI->cases()) {
+    BasicBlock *TargetBlock = C.getCaseSuccessor();
+    if (SwitchEdges.lookup(TargetBlock) == 1) {
+      PredicateSwitch *PS = new PredicateSwitch(
+          Op, SI->getParent(), TargetBlock, C.getCaseValue(), SI);
+      addInfoFor(OpsToRename, Op, PS);
+      if (!TargetBlock->getSinglePredecessor())
+        EdgeUsesOnly.insert({BranchBB, TargetBlock});
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// Build predicate info for our function
+void PredicateInfo::buildPredicateInfo() {
+  DT.updateDFSNumbers();
+  // Collect operands to rename from all conditional branch terminators, as well
+  // as assume statements.
+  SmallPtrSet<Value *, 8> OpsToRename;
+  for (auto DTN : depth_first(DT.getRootNode())) {
+    BasicBlock *BranchBB = DTN->getBlock();
+    if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BranchBB->getTerminator())) {
+      if (!BI->isConditional())
+        continue;
+      // Can't insert conditional information if they all go to the same place.
+      if (BI->getSuccessor(0) == BI->getSuccessor(1))
+        continue;
+      processBranch(BI, BranchBB, OpsToRename);
+    } else if (auto *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(BranchBB->getTerminator())) {
+      processSwitch(SI, BranchBB, OpsToRename);
+    }
+  }
+  for (auto &Assume : AC.assumptions()) {
+    if (auto *II = dyn_cast_or_null<IntrinsicInst>(Assume))
+      processAssume(II, II->getParent(), OpsToRename);
+  }
+  // Now rename all our operations.
+  renameUses(OpsToRename);
+}
+
+// Given the renaming stack, make all the operands currently on the stack real
+// by inserting them into the IR.  Return the last operation's value.
+Value *PredicateInfo::materializeStack(unsigned int &Counter,
+                                       ValueDFSStack &RenameStack,
+                                       Value *OrigOp) {
+  // Find the first thing we have to materialize
+  auto RevIter = RenameStack.rbegin();
+  for (; RevIter != RenameStack.rend(); ++RevIter)
+    if (RevIter->Def)
+      break;
+
+  size_t Start = RevIter - RenameStack.rbegin();
+  // The maximum number of things we should be trying to materialize at once
+  // right now is 4, depending on if we had an assume, a branch, and both used
+  // and of conditions.
+  for (auto RenameIter = RenameStack.end() - Start;
+       RenameIter != RenameStack.end(); ++RenameIter) {
+    auto *Op =
+        RenameIter == RenameStack.begin() ? OrigOp : (RenameIter - 1)->Def;
+    ValueDFS &Result = *RenameIter;
+    auto *ValInfo = Result.PInfo;
+    // For edge predicates, we can just place the operand in the block before
+    // the terminator.  For assume, we have to place it right before the assume
+    // to ensure we dominate all of our uses.  Always insert right before the
+    // relevant instruction (terminator, assume), so that we insert in proper
+    // order in the case of multiple predicateinfo in the same block.
+    if (isa<PredicateWithEdge>(ValInfo)) {
+      IRBuilder<> B(getBranchTerminator(ValInfo));
+      Function *IF = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
+          F.getParent(), Intrinsic::ssa_copy, Op->getType());
+      CallInst *PIC =
+          B.CreateCall(IF, Op, Op->getName() + "." + Twine(Counter++));
+      PredicateMap.insert({PIC, ValInfo});
+      Result.Def = PIC;
+    } else {
+      auto *PAssume = dyn_cast<PredicateAssume>(ValInfo);
+      assert(PAssume &&
+             "Should not have gotten here without it being an assume");
+      IRBuilder<> B(PAssume->AssumeInst);
+      Function *IF = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
+          F.getParent(), Intrinsic::ssa_copy, Op->getType());
+      CallInst *PIC = B.CreateCall(IF, Op);
+      PredicateMap.insert({PIC, ValInfo});
+      Result.Def = PIC;
+    }
+  }
+  return RenameStack.back().Def;
+}
+
+// Instead of the standard SSA renaming algorithm, which is O(Number of
+// instructions), and walks the entire dominator tree, we walk only the defs +
+// uses.  The standard SSA renaming algorithm does not really rely on the
+// dominator tree except to order the stack push/pops of the renaming stacks, so
+// that defs end up getting pushed before hitting the correct uses.  This does
+// not require the dominator tree, only the *order* of the dominator tree. The
+// complete and correct ordering of the defs and uses, in dominator tree is
+// contained in the DFS numbering of the dominator tree. So we sort the defs and
+// uses into the DFS ordering, and then just use the renaming stack as per
+// normal, pushing when we hit a def (which is a predicateinfo instruction),
+// popping when we are out of the dfs scope for that def, and replacing any uses
+// with top of stack if it exists.  In order to handle liveness without
+// propagating liveness info, we don't actually insert the predicateinfo
+// instruction def until we see a use that it would dominate.  Once we see such
+// a use, we materialize the predicateinfo instruction in the right place and
+// use it.
+//
+// TODO: Use this algorithm to perform fast single-variable renaming in
+// promotememtoreg and memoryssa.
+void PredicateInfo::renameUses(SmallPtrSetImpl<Value *> &OpSet) {
+  // Sort OpsToRename since we are going to iterate it.
+  SmallVector<Value *, 8> OpsToRename(OpSet.begin(), OpSet.end());
+  auto Comparator = [&](const Value *A, const Value *B) {
+    return valueComesBefore(OI, A, B);
+  };
+  std::sort(OpsToRename.begin(), OpsToRename.end(), Comparator);
+  ValueDFS_Compare Compare(OI);
+  // Compute liveness, and rename in O(uses) per Op.
+  for (auto *Op : OpsToRename) {
+    unsigned Counter = 0;
+    SmallVector<ValueDFS, 16> OrderedUses;
+    const auto &ValueInfo = getValueInfo(Op);
+    // Insert the possible copies into the def/use list.
+    // They will become real copies if we find a real use for them, and never
+    // created otherwise.
+    for (auto &PossibleCopy : ValueInfo.Infos) {
+      ValueDFS VD;
+      // Determine where we are going to place the copy by the copy type.
+      // The predicate info for branches always come first, they will get
+      // materialized in the split block at the top of the block.
+      // The predicate info for assumes will be somewhere in the middle,
+      // it will get materialized in front of the assume.
+      if (const auto *PAssume = dyn_cast<PredicateAssume>(PossibleCopy)) {
+        VD.LocalNum = LN_Middle;
+        DomTreeNode *DomNode = DT.getNode(PAssume->AssumeInst->getParent());
+        if (!DomNode)
+          continue;
+        VD.DFSIn = DomNode->getDFSNumIn();
+        VD.DFSOut = DomNode->getDFSNumOut();
+        VD.PInfo = PossibleCopy;
+        OrderedUses.push_back(VD);
+      } else if (isa<PredicateWithEdge>(PossibleCopy)) {
+        // If we can only do phi uses, we treat it like it's in the branch
+        // block, and handle it specially. We know that it goes last, and only
+        // dominate phi uses.
+        auto BlockEdge = getBlockEdge(PossibleCopy);
+        if (EdgeUsesOnly.count(BlockEdge)) {
+          VD.LocalNum = LN_Last;
+          auto *DomNode = DT.getNode(BlockEdge.first);
+          if (DomNode) {
+            VD.DFSIn = DomNode->getDFSNumIn();
+            VD.DFSOut = DomNode->getDFSNumOut();
+            VD.PInfo = PossibleCopy;
+            VD.EdgeOnly = true;
+            OrderedUses.push_back(VD);
+          }
+        } else {
+          // Otherwise, we are in the split block (even though we perform
+          // insertion in the branch block).
+          // Insert a possible copy at the split block and before the branch.
+          VD.LocalNum = LN_First;
+          auto *DomNode = DT.getNode(BlockEdge.second);
+          if (DomNode) {
+            VD.DFSIn = DomNode->getDFSNumIn();
+            VD.DFSOut = DomNode->getDFSNumOut();
+            VD.PInfo = PossibleCopy;
+            OrderedUses.push_back(VD);
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
+    convertUsesToDFSOrdered(Op, OrderedUses);
+    std::sort(OrderedUses.begin(), OrderedUses.end(), Compare);
+    SmallVector<ValueDFS, 8> RenameStack;
+    // For each use, sorted into dfs order, push values and replaces uses with
+    // top of stack, which will represent the reaching def.
+    for (auto &VD : OrderedUses) {
+      // We currently do not materialize copy over copy, but we should decide if
+      // we want to.
+      bool PossibleCopy = VD.PInfo != nullptr;
+      if (RenameStack.empty()) {
+        DEBUG(dbgs() << "Rename Stack is empty\n");
+      } else {
+        DEBUG(dbgs() << "Rename Stack Top DFS numbers are ("
+                     << RenameStack.back().DFSIn << ","
+                     << RenameStack.back().DFSOut << ")\n");
+      }
+
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "Current DFS numbers are (" << VD.DFSIn << ","
+                   << VD.DFSOut << ")\n");
+
+      bool ShouldPush = (VD.Def || PossibleCopy);
+      bool OutOfScope = !stackIsInScope(RenameStack, VD);
+      if (OutOfScope || ShouldPush) {
+        // Sync to our current scope.
+        popStackUntilDFSScope(RenameStack, VD);
+        if (ShouldPush) {
+          RenameStack.push_back(VD);
+        }
+      }
+      // If we get to this point, and the stack is empty we must have a use
+      // with no renaming needed, just skip it.
+      if (RenameStack.empty())
+        continue;
+      // Skip values, only want to rename the uses
+      if (VD.Def || PossibleCopy)
+        continue;
+      if (!DebugCounter::shouldExecute(RenameCounter)) {
+        DEBUG(dbgs() << "Skipping execution due to debug counter\n");
+        continue;
+      }
+      ValueDFS &Result = RenameStack.back();
+
+      // If the possible copy dominates something, materialize our stack up to
+      // this point. This ensures every comparison that affects our operation
+      // ends up with predicateinfo.
+      if (!Result.Def)
+        Result.Def = materializeStack(Counter, RenameStack, Op);
+
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "Found replacement " << *Result.Def << " for "
+                   << *VD.U->get() << " in " << *(VD.U->getUser()) << "\n");
+      assert(DT.dominates(cast<Instruction>(Result.Def), *VD.U) &&
+             "Predicateinfo def should have dominated this use");
+      VD.U->set(Result.Def);
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+PredicateInfo::ValueInfo &PredicateInfo::getOrCreateValueInfo(Value *Operand) {
+  auto OIN = ValueInfoNums.find(Operand);
+  if (OIN == ValueInfoNums.end()) {
+    // This will grow it
+    ValueInfos.resize(ValueInfos.size() + 1);
+    // This will use the new size and give us a 0 based number of the info
+    auto InsertResult = ValueInfoNums.insert({Operand, ValueInfos.size() - 1});
+    assert(InsertResult.second && "Value info number already existed?");
+    return ValueInfos[InsertResult.first->second];
+  }
+  return ValueInfos[OIN->second];
+}
+
+const PredicateInfo::ValueInfo &
+PredicateInfo::getValueInfo(Value *Operand) const {
+  auto OINI = ValueInfoNums.lookup(Operand);
+  assert(OINI != 0 && "Operand was not really in the Value Info Numbers");
+  assert(OINI < ValueInfos.size() &&
+         "Value Info Number greater than size of Value Info Table");
+  return ValueInfos[OINI];
+}
+
+PredicateInfo::PredicateInfo(Function &F, DominatorTree &DT,
+                             AssumptionCache &AC)
+    : F(F), DT(DT), AC(AC), OI(&DT) {
+  // Push an empty operand info so that we can detect 0 as not finding one
+  ValueInfos.resize(1);
+  buildPredicateInfo();
+}
+
+PredicateInfo::~PredicateInfo() {}
+
+void PredicateInfo::verifyPredicateInfo() const {}
+
+char PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass::ID = 0;
+
+PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass::PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass()
+    : FunctionPass(ID) {
+  initializePredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPassPass(
+      *PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
+}
+
+void PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
+  AU.setPreservesAll();
+  AU.addRequiredTransitive<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
+  AU.addRequired<AssumptionCacheTracker>();
+}
+
+bool PredicateInfoPrinterLegacyPass::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
+  auto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
+  auto &AC = getAnalysis<AssumptionCacheTracker>().getAssumptionCache(F);
+  auto PredInfo = make_unique<PredicateInfo>(F, DT, AC);
+  PredInfo->print(dbgs());
+  if (VerifyPredicateInfo)
+    PredInfo->verifyPredicateInfo();
+  return false;
+}
+
+PreservedAnalyses PredicateInfoPrinterPass::run(Function &F,
+                                                FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
+  auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
+  auto &AC = AM.getResult<AssumptionAnalysis>(F);
+  OS << "PredicateInfo for function: " << F.getName() << "\n";
+  make_unique<PredicateInfo>(F, DT, AC)->print(OS);
+
+  return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+}
+
+/// \brief An assembly annotator class to print PredicateInfo information in
+/// comments.
+class PredicateInfoAnnotatedWriter : public AssemblyAnnotationWriter {
+  friend class PredicateInfo;
+  const PredicateInfo *PredInfo;
+
+public:
+  PredicateInfoAnnotatedWriter(const PredicateInfo *M) : PredInfo(M) {}
+
+  virtual void emitBasicBlockStartAnnot(const BasicBlock *BB,
+                                        formatted_raw_ostream &OS) {}
+
+  virtual void emitInstructionAnnot(const Instruction *I,
+                                    formatted_raw_ostream &OS) {
+    if (const auto *PI = PredInfo->getPredicateInfoFor(I)) {
+      OS << "; Has predicate info\n";
+      if (const auto *PB = dyn_cast<PredicateBranch>(PI)) {
+        OS << "; branch predicate info { TrueEdge: " << PB->TrueEdge
+           << " Comparison:" << *PB->Condition << " Edge: [";
+        PB->From->printAsOperand(OS);
+        OS << ",";
+        PB->To->printAsOperand(OS);
+        OS << "] }\n";
+      } else if (const auto *PS = dyn_cast<PredicateSwitch>(PI)) {
+        OS << "; switch predicate info { CaseValue: " << *PS->CaseValue
+           << " Switch:" << *PS->Switch << " Edge: [";
+        PS->From->printAsOperand(OS);
+        OS << ",";
+        PS->To->printAsOperand(OS);
+        OS << "] }\n";
+      } else if (const auto *PA = dyn_cast<PredicateAssume>(PI)) {
+        OS << "; assume predicate info {"
+           << " Comparison:" << *PA->Condition << " }\n";
+      }
+    }
+  }
+};
+
+void PredicateInfo::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
+  PredicateInfoAnnotatedWriter Writer(this);
+  F.print(OS, &Writer);
+}
+
+void PredicateInfo::dump() const {
+  PredicateInfoAnnotatedWriter Writer(this);
+  F.print(dbgs(), &Writer);
+}
+
+PreservedAnalyses PredicateInfoVerifierPass::run(Function &F,
+                                                 FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
+  auto &DT = AM.getResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
+  auto &AC = AM.getResult<AssumptionAnalysis>(F);
+  make_unique<PredicateInfo>(F, DT, AC)->verifyPredicateInfo();
+
+  return PreservedAnalyses::all();
+}
+}