diff options
author | dim <dim@FreeBSD.org> | 2017-09-26 19:56:36 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Luiz Souza <luiz@netgate.com> | 2018-02-21 15:12:19 -0300 |
commit | 1dcd2e8d24b295bc73e513acec2ed1514bb66be4 (patch) | |
tree | 4bd13a34c251e980e1a6b13584ca1f63b0dfe670 /contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp | |
parent | f45541ca2a56a1ba1202f94c080b04e96c1fa239 (diff) | |
download | FreeBSD-src-1dcd2e8d24b295bc73e513acec2ed1514bb66be4.zip FreeBSD-src-1dcd2e8d24b295bc73e513acec2ed1514bb66be4.tar.gz |
Merge clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ 5.0.0 release.
MFC r309126 (by emaste):
Correct lld llvm-tblgen dependency file name
MFC r309169:
Get rid of separate Subversion mergeinfo properties for llvm-dwarfdump
and llvm-lto. The mergeinfo confuses Subversion enormously, and these
directories will just use the mergeinfo for llvm itself.
MFC r312765:
Pull in r276136 from upstream llvm trunk (by Wei Mi):
Use ValueOffsetPair to enhance value reuse during SCEV expansion.
In D12090, the ExprValueMap was added to reuse existing value during
SCEV expansion. However, const folding and sext/zext distribution can
make the reuse still difficult.
A simplified case is: suppose we know S1 expands to V1 in
ExprValueMap, and
S1 = S2 + C_a
S3 = S2 + C_b
where C_a and C_b are different SCEVConstants. Then we'd like to
expand S3 as V1 - C_a + C_b instead of expanding S2 literally. It is
helpful when S2 is a complex SCEV expr and S2 has no entry in
ExprValueMap, which is usually caused by the fact that S3 is
generated from S1 after const folding.
In order to do that, we represent ExprValueMap as a mapping from SCEV
to ValueOffsetPair. We will save both S1->{V1, 0} and S2->{V1, C_a}
into the ExprValueMap when we create SCEV for V1. When S3 is
expanded, it will first expand S2 to V1 - C_a because of S2->{V1,
C_a} in the map, then expand S3 to V1 - C_a + C_b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313
This should fix assertion failures when building OpenCV >= 3.1.
PR: 215649
MFC r312831:
Revert r312765 for now, since it causes assertions when building
lang/spidermonkey24.
Reported by: antoine
PR: 215649
MFC r316511 (by jhb):
Add an implementation of __ffssi2() derived from __ffsdi2().
Newer versions of GCC include an __ffssi2() symbol in libgcc and the
compiler can emit calls to it in generated code. This is true for at
least GCC 6.2 when compiling world for mips and mips64.
Reviewed by: jmallett, dim
Sponsored by: DARPA / AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10086
MFC r318601 (by adrian):
[libcompiler-rt] add bswapdi2/bswapsi2
This is required for mips gcc 6.3 userland to build/run.
Reviewed by: emaste, dim
Approved by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10838
MFC r318884 (by emaste):
lldb: map TRAP_CAP to a trace trap
In the absense of a more specific handler for TRAP_CAP (generated by
ENOTCAPABLE or ECAPMODE while in capability mode) treat it as a trace
trap.
Example usage (testing the bug in PR219173):
% proccontrol -m trapcap lldb usr.bin/hexdump/obj/hexdump -- -Cv -s 1 /bin/ls
...
(lldb) run
Process 12980 launching
Process 12980 launched: '.../usr.bin/hexdump/obj/hexdump' (x86_64)
Process 12980 stopped
* thread #1, stop reason = trace
frame #0: 0x0000004b80c65f1a libc.so.7`__sys_lseek + 10
...
In the future we should have LLDB control the trapcap procctl itself
(as it does with ASLR), as well as report a specific stop reason.
This change eliminates an assertion failure from LLDB for now.
MFC r319796:
Remove a few unneeded files from libllvm, libclang and liblldb.
MFC r319885 (by emaste):
lld: ELF: Fix ICF crash on absolute symbol relocations.
If two sections contained relocations to absolute symbols with the same
value we would crash when trying to access their sections. Add a check that
both symbols point to sections before accessing their sections, and treat
absolute symbols as equal if their values are equal.
Obtained from: LLD commit r292578
MFC r319918:
Revert r319796 for now, it can cause undefined references when linking
in some circumstances.
Reported by: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>
MFC r319957 (by emaste):
lld: Add armelf emulation mode
Obtained from: LLD r305375
MFC r321369:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
5.0.0 (trunk r308421). Upstream has branched for the 5.0.0 release,
which should be in about a month. Please report bugs and regressions,
so we can get them into the release.
Please note that from 3.5.0 onwards, clang, llvm and lldb require C++11
support to build; see UPDATING for more information.
MFC r321420:
Add a few more object files to liblldb, which should solve errors when
linking the lldb executable in some cases. In particular, when the
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections options are turned off, or
ineffective.
Reported by: Shawn Webb, Mark Millard
MFC r321433:
Cleanup stale Options.inc files from the previous libllvm build for
clang 4.0.0. Otherwise, these can get included before the two newly
generated ones (which are different) for clang 5.0.0.
Reported by: Mark Millard
MFC r321439 (by bdrewery):
Move llvm Options.inc hack from r321433 for NO_CLEAN to lib/clang/libllvm.
The files are only ever generated to .OBJDIR, not to WORLDTMP (as a
sysroot) and are only ever included from a compilation. So using
a beforebuild target here removes the file before the compilation
tries to include it.
MFC r321664:
Pull in r308891 from upstream llvm trunk (by Benjamin Kramer):
[CodeGenPrepare] Cut off FindAllMemoryUses if there are too many uses.
This avoids excessive compile time. The case I'm looking at is
Function.cpp from an old version of LLVM that still had the giant
memcmp string matcher in it. Before r308322 this compiled in about 2
minutes, after it, clang takes infinite* time to compile it. With
this patch we're at 5 min, which is still bad but this is a
pathological case.
The cut off at 20 uses was chosen by looking at other cut-offs in LLVM
for user scanning. It's probably too high, but does the job and is
very unlikely to regress anything.
Fixes PR33900.
* I'm impatient and aborted after 15 minutes, on the bug report it was
killed after 2h.
Pull in r308986 from upstream llvm trunk (by Simon Pilgrim):
[X86][CGP] Reduce memcmp() expansion to 2 load pairs (PR33914)
D35067/rL308322 attempted to support up to 4 load pairs for memcmp
inlining which resulted in regressions for some optimized libc memcmp
implementations (PR33914).
Until we can match these more optimal cases, this patch reduces the
memcmp expansion to a maximum of 2 load pairs (which matches what we
do for -Os).
This patch should be considered for the 5.0.0 release branch as well
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35830
These fix a hang (or extremely long compile time) when building older
LLVM ports.
Reported by: antoine
PR: 219139
MFC r321719:
Pull in r309503 from upstream clang trunk (by Richard Smith):
PR33902: Invalidate line number cache when adding more text to
existing buffer.
This led to crashes as the line number cache would report a bogus
line number for a line of code, and we'd try to find a nonexistent
column within the line when printing diagnostics.
This fixes an assertion when building the graphics/champlain port.
Reported by: antoine, kwm
PR: 219139
MFC r321723:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld and lldb to r309439 from the
upstream release_50 branch. This is just after upstream's 5.0.0-rc1.
MFC r322320:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm and libc++ to r310316 from the
upstream release_50 branch.
MFC r322326 (by emaste):
lldb: Make i386-*-freebsd expression work on JIT path
* Enable i386 ABI creation for freebsd
* Added an extra argument in ABISysV_i386::PrepareTrivialCall for mmap
syscall
* Unlike linux, the last argument of mmap is actually 64-bit(off_t).
This requires us to push an additional word for the higher order bits.
* Prior to this change, ktrace dump will show mmap failures due to
invalid argument coming from the 6th mmap argument.
Submitted by: Karnajit Wangkhem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34776
MFC r322360 (by emaste):
lldb: Report inferior signals as signals, not exceptions, on FreeBSD
This is the FreeBSD equivalent of LLVM r238549.
This serves 2 purposes:
* LLDB should handle inferior process signals SIGSEGV/SIGILL/SIGBUS/
SIGFPE the way it is suppose to be handled. Prior to this fix these
signals will neither create a coredump, nor exit from the debugger
or work for signal handling scenario.
* eInvalidCrashReason need not report "unknown crash reason" if we have
a valid si_signo
llvm.org/pr23699
Patch by Karnajit Wangkhem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35223
Submitted by: Karnajit Wangkhem
Obtained from: LLVM r310591
MFC r322474 (by emaste):
lld: Add `-z muldefs` option.
Obtained from: LLVM r310757
MFC r322740:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld and libc++ to r311219 from the
upstream release_50 branch.
MFC r322855:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lldb and compiler-rt to r311606 from
the upstream release_50 branch.
As of this version, lib/msun's trig test should also work correctly
again (see bug 220989 for more information).
PR: 220989
MFC r323112:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lldb and compiler-rt to r312293 from
the upstream release_50 branch. This corresponds to 5.0.0 rc4.
As of this version, the cad/stepcode port should now compile in a more
reasonable time on i386 (see bug 221836 for more information).
PR: 221836
MFC r323245:
Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
5.0.0 release (upstream r312559).
Release notes for llvm, clang and lld will be available here soon:
<http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/5.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
Relnotes: yes
(cherry picked from commit 12cd91cf4c6b96a24427c0de5374916f2808d263)
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp | 162 |
1 files changed, 151 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp index 842cf31..5c21490 100644 --- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp +++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnrollPeel.cpp @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h" +#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h" #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/UnrollLoop.h" #include <algorithm> @@ -45,6 +46,11 @@ static cl::opt<unsigned> UnrollForcePeelCount( "unroll-force-peel-count", cl::init(0), cl::Hidden, cl::desc("Force a peel count regardless of profiling information.")); +// Designates that a Phi is estimated to become invariant after an "infinite" +// number of loop iterations (i.e. only may become an invariant if the loop is +// fully unrolled). +static const unsigned InfiniteIterationsToInvariance = UINT_MAX; + // Check whether we are capable of peeling this loop. static bool canPeel(Loop *L) { // Make sure the loop is in simplified form @@ -55,12 +61,72 @@ static bool canPeel(Loop *L) { if (!L->getExitingBlock() || !L->getUniqueExitBlock()) return false; + // Don't try to peel loops where the latch is not the exiting block. + // This can be an indication of two different things: + // 1) The loop is not rotated. + // 2) The loop contains irreducible control flow that involves the latch. + if (L->getLoopLatch() != L->getExitingBlock()) + return false; + return true; } +// This function calculates the number of iterations after which the given Phi +// becomes an invariant. The pre-calculated values are memorized in the map. The +// function (shortcut is I) is calculated according to the following definition: +// Given %x = phi <Inputs from above the loop>, ..., [%y, %back.edge]. +// If %y is a loop invariant, then I(%x) = 1. +// If %y is a Phi from the loop header, I(%x) = I(%y) + 1. +// Otherwise, I(%x) is infinite. +// TODO: Actually if %y is an expression that depends only on Phi %z and some +// loop invariants, we can estimate I(%x) = I(%z) + 1. The example +// looks like: +// %x = phi(0, %a), <-- becomes invariant starting from 3rd iteration. +// %y = phi(0, 5), +// %a = %y + 1. +static unsigned calculateIterationsToInvariance( + PHINode *Phi, Loop *L, BasicBlock *BackEdge, + SmallDenseMap<PHINode *, unsigned> &IterationsToInvariance) { + assert(Phi->getParent() == L->getHeader() && + "Non-loop Phi should not be checked for turning into invariant."); + assert(BackEdge == L->getLoopLatch() && "Wrong latch?"); + // If we already know the answer, take it from the map. + auto I = IterationsToInvariance.find(Phi); + if (I != IterationsToInvariance.end()) + return I->second; + + // Otherwise we need to analyze the input from the back edge. + Value *Input = Phi->getIncomingValueForBlock(BackEdge); + // Place infinity to map to avoid infinite recursion for cycled Phis. Such + // cycles can never stop on an invariant. + IterationsToInvariance[Phi] = InfiniteIterationsToInvariance; + unsigned ToInvariance = InfiniteIterationsToInvariance; + + if (L->isLoopInvariant(Input)) + ToInvariance = 1u; + else if (PHINode *IncPhi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(Input)) { + // Only consider Phis in header block. + if (IncPhi->getParent() != L->getHeader()) + return InfiniteIterationsToInvariance; + // If the input becomes an invariant after X iterations, then our Phi + // becomes an invariant after X + 1 iterations. + unsigned InputToInvariance = calculateIterationsToInvariance( + IncPhi, L, BackEdge, IterationsToInvariance); + if (InputToInvariance != InfiniteIterationsToInvariance) + ToInvariance = InputToInvariance + 1u; + } + + // If we found that this Phi lies in an invariant chain, update the map. + if (ToInvariance != InfiniteIterationsToInvariance) + IterationsToInvariance[Phi] = ToInvariance; + return ToInvariance; +} + // Return the number of iterations we want to peel off. void llvm::computePeelCount(Loop *L, unsigned LoopSize, - TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences &UP) { + TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences &UP, + unsigned &TripCount) { + assert(LoopSize > 0 && "Zero loop size is not allowed!"); UP.PeelCount = 0; if (!canPeel(L)) return; @@ -69,6 +135,46 @@ void llvm::computePeelCount(Loop *L, unsigned LoopSize, if (!L->empty()) return; + // Here we try to get rid of Phis which become invariants after 1, 2, ..., N + // iterations of the loop. For this we compute the number for iterations after + // which every Phi is guaranteed to become an invariant, and try to peel the + // maximum number of iterations among these values, thus turning all those + // Phis into invariants. + // First, check that we can peel at least one iteration. + if (2 * LoopSize <= UP.Threshold && UnrollPeelMaxCount > 0) { + // Store the pre-calculated values here. + SmallDenseMap<PHINode *, unsigned> IterationsToInvariance; + // Now go through all Phis to calculate their the number of iterations they + // need to become invariants. + unsigned DesiredPeelCount = 0; + BasicBlock *BackEdge = L->getLoopLatch(); + assert(BackEdge && "Loop is not in simplified form?"); + for (auto BI = L->getHeader()->begin(); isa<PHINode>(&*BI); ++BI) { + PHINode *Phi = cast<PHINode>(&*BI); + unsigned ToInvariance = calculateIterationsToInvariance( + Phi, L, BackEdge, IterationsToInvariance); + if (ToInvariance != InfiniteIterationsToInvariance) + DesiredPeelCount = std::max(DesiredPeelCount, ToInvariance); + } + if (DesiredPeelCount > 0) { + // Pay respect to limitations implied by loop size and the max peel count. + unsigned MaxPeelCount = UnrollPeelMaxCount; + MaxPeelCount = std::min(MaxPeelCount, UP.Threshold / LoopSize - 1); + DesiredPeelCount = std::min(DesiredPeelCount, MaxPeelCount); + // Consider max peel count limitation. + assert(DesiredPeelCount > 0 && "Wrong loop size estimation?"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "Peel " << DesiredPeelCount << " iteration(s) to turn" + << " some Phis into invariants.\n"); + UP.PeelCount = DesiredPeelCount; + return; + } + } + + // Bail if we know the statically calculated trip count. + // In this case we rather prefer partial unrolling. + if (TripCount) + return; + // If the user provided a peel count, use that. bool UserPeelCount = UnrollForcePeelCount.getNumOccurrences() > 0; if (UserPeelCount) { @@ -164,7 +270,8 @@ static void cloneLoopBlocks(Loop *L, unsigned IterNumber, BasicBlock *InsertTop, BasicBlock *InsertBot, BasicBlock *Exit, SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *> &NewBlocks, LoopBlocksDFS &LoopBlocks, ValueToValueMapTy &VMap, - ValueToValueMapTy &LVMap, LoopInfo *LI) { + ValueToValueMapTy &LVMap, DominatorTree *DT, + LoopInfo *LI) { BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader(); BasicBlock *Latch = L->getLoopLatch(); @@ -185,6 +292,17 @@ static void cloneLoopBlocks(Loop *L, unsigned IterNumber, BasicBlock *InsertTop, ParentLoop->addBasicBlockToLoop(NewBB, *LI); VMap[*BB] = NewBB; + + // If dominator tree is available, insert nodes to represent cloned blocks. + if (DT) { + if (Header == *BB) + DT->addNewBlock(NewBB, InsertTop); + else { + DomTreeNode *IDom = DT->getNode(*BB)->getIDom(); + // VMap must contain entry for IDom, as the iteration order is RPO. + DT->addNewBlock(NewBB, cast<BasicBlock>(VMap[IDom->getBlock()])); + } + } } // Hook-up the control flow for the newly inserted blocks. @@ -198,11 +316,13 @@ static void cloneLoopBlocks(Loop *L, unsigned IterNumber, BasicBlock *InsertTop, // The backedge now goes to the "bottom", which is either the loop's real // header (for the last peeled iteration) or the copied header of the next // iteration (for every other iteration) - BranchInst *LatchBR = - cast<BranchInst>(cast<BasicBlock>(VMap[Latch])->getTerminator()); + BasicBlock *NewLatch = cast<BasicBlock>(VMap[Latch]); + BranchInst *LatchBR = cast<BranchInst>(NewLatch->getTerminator()); unsigned HeaderIdx = (LatchBR->getSuccessor(0) == Header ? 0 : 1); LatchBR->setSuccessor(HeaderIdx, InsertBot); LatchBR->setSuccessor(1 - HeaderIdx, Exit); + if (DT) + DT->changeImmediateDominator(InsertBot, NewLatch); // The new copy of the loop body starts with a bunch of PHI nodes // that pick an incoming value from either the preheader, or the previous @@ -257,7 +377,7 @@ static void cloneLoopBlocks(Loop *L, unsigned IterNumber, BasicBlock *InsertTop, /// optimizations. bool llvm::peelLoop(Loop *L, unsigned PeelCount, LoopInfo *LI, ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT, - bool PreserveLCSSA) { + AssumptionCache *AC, bool PreserveLCSSA) { if (!canPeel(L)) return false; @@ -358,7 +478,24 @@ bool llvm::peelLoop(Loop *L, unsigned PeelCount, LoopInfo *LI, CurHeaderWeight = 1; cloneLoopBlocks(L, Iter, InsertTop, InsertBot, Exit, - NewBlocks, LoopBlocks, VMap, LVMap, LI); + NewBlocks, LoopBlocks, VMap, LVMap, DT, LI); + + // Remap to use values from the current iteration instead of the + // previous one. + remapInstructionsInBlocks(NewBlocks, VMap); + + if (DT) { + // Latches of the cloned loops dominate over the loop exit, so idom of the + // latter is the first cloned loop body, as original PreHeader dominates + // the original loop body. + if (Iter == 0) + DT->changeImmediateDominator(Exit, cast<BasicBlock>(LVMap[Latch])); +#ifndef NDEBUG + if (VerifyDomInfo) + DT->verifyDomTree(); +#endif + } + updateBranchWeights(InsertBot, cast<BranchInst>(VMap[LatchBR]), Iter, PeelCount, ExitWeight); @@ -369,10 +506,6 @@ bool llvm::peelLoop(Loop *L, unsigned PeelCount, LoopInfo *LI, F->getBasicBlockList().splice(InsertTop->getIterator(), F->getBasicBlockList(), NewBlocks[0]->getIterator(), F->end()); - - // Remap to use values from the current iteration instead of the - // previous one. - remapInstructionsInBlocks(NewBlocks, VMap); } // Now adjust the phi nodes in the loop header to get their initial values @@ -405,9 +538,16 @@ bool llvm::peelLoop(Loop *L, unsigned PeelCount, LoopInfo *LI, } // If the loop is nested, we changed the parent loop, update SE. - if (Loop *ParentLoop = L->getParentLoop()) + if (Loop *ParentLoop = L->getParentLoop()) { SE->forgetLoop(ParentLoop); + // FIXME: Incrementally update loop-simplify + simplifyLoop(ParentLoop, DT, LI, SE, AC, PreserveLCSSA); + } else { + // FIXME: Incrementally update loop-simplify + simplifyLoop(L, DT, LI, SE, AC, PreserveLCSSA); + } + NumPeeled++; return true; |