summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authordim <dim@FreeBSD.org>2014-03-21 17:53:59 +0000
committerdim <dim@FreeBSD.org>2014-03-21 17:53:59 +0000
commit9cedb8bb69b89b0f0c529937247a6a80cabdbaec (patch)
treec978f0e9ec1ab92dc8123783f30b08a7fd1e2a39 /contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
parent03fdc2934eb61c44c049a02b02aa974cfdd8a0eb (diff)
downloadFreeBSD-src-9cedb8bb69b89b0f0c529937247a6a80cabdbaec.zip
FreeBSD-src-9cedb8bb69b89b0f0c529937247a6a80cabdbaec.tar.gz
MFC 261991:
Upgrade our copy of llvm/clang to 3.4 release. This version supports all of the features in the current working draft of the upcoming C++ standard, provisionally named C++1y. The code generator's performance is greatly increased, and the loop auto-vectorizer is now enabled at -Os and -O2 in addition to -O3. The PowerPC backend has made several major improvements to code generation quality and compile time, and the X86, SPARC, ARM32, Aarch64 and SystemZ backends have all seen major feature work. Release notes for llvm and clang can be found here: <http://llvm.org/releases/3.4/docs/ReleaseNotes.html> <http://llvm.org/releases/3.4/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html> MFC 262121 (by emaste): Update lldb for clang/llvm 3.4 import This commit largely restores the lldb source to the upstream r196259 snapshot with the addition of threaded inferior support and a few bug fixes. Specific upstream lldb revisions restored include: SVN git 181387 779e6ac 181703 7bef4e2 182099 b31044e 182650 f2dcf35 182683 0d91b80 183862 15c1774 183929 99447a6 184177 0b2934b 184948 4dc3761 184954 007e7bc 186990 eebd175 Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL MFC 262186 (by emaste): Fix mismerge in r262121 A break statement was lost in the merge. The error had no functional impact, but restore it to reduce the diff against upstream. MFC 262303: Pull in r197521 from upstream clang trunk (by rdivacky): Use the integrated assembler by default on FreeBSD/ppc and ppc64. Requested by: jhibbits MFC 262611: Pull in r196874 from upstream llvm trunk: Fix a crash that occurs when PWD is invalid. MCJIT needs to be able to run in hostile environments, even when PWD is invalid. There's no need to crash MCJIT in this case. The obvious fix is to simply leave MCContext's CompilationDir empty when PWD can't be determined. This way, MCJIT clients, and other clients that link with LLVM don't need a valid working directory. If we do want to guarantee valid CompilationDir, that should be done only for clients of getCompilationDir(). This is as simple as checking for an empty string. The only current use of getCompilationDir is EmitGenDwarfInfo, which won't conceivably run with an invalid working dir. However, in the purely hypothetically and untestable case that this happens, the AT_comp_dir will be omitted from the compilation_unit DIE. This should help fix assertions occurring with ports-mgmt/tinderbox, when it is using jails, and sometimes invalidates clang's current working directory. Reported by: decke MFC 262809: Pull in r203007 from upstream clang trunk: Don't produce an alias between destructors with different calling conventions. Fixes pr19007. (Please note that is an LLVM PR identifier, not a FreeBSD one.) This should fix Firefox and/or libxul crashes (due to problems with regparm/stdcall calling conventions) on i386. Reported by: multiple users on freebsd-current PR: bin/187103 MFC 263048: Repair recognition of "CC" as an alias for the C++ compiler, since it was silently broken by upstream for a Windows-specific use-case. Apparently some versions of CMake still rely on this archaic feature... Reported by: rakuco MFC 263049: Garbage collect the old way of adding the libstdc++ include directories in clang's InitHeaderSearch.cpp. This has been superseded by David Chisnall's commit in r255321. Moreover, if libc++ is used, the libstdc++ include directories should not be in the search path at all. These directories are now only used if you pass -stdlib=libstdc++.
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp')
-rw-r--r--contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp392
1 files changed, 290 insertions, 102 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
index 4c252c0..9bb65ef 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::
FoldCmpLoadFromIndexedGlobal(GetElementPtrInst *GEP, GlobalVariable *GV,
CmpInst &ICI, ConstantInt *AndCst) {
// We need TD information to know the pointer size unless this is inbounds.
- if (!GEP->isInBounds() && TD == 0) return 0;
+ if (!GEP->isInBounds() && TD == 0)
+ return 0;
Constant *Init = GV->getInitializer();
if (!isa<ConstantArray>(Init) && !isa<ConstantDataArray>(Init))
@@ -393,16 +394,19 @@ FoldCmpLoadFromIndexedGlobal(GetElementPtrInst *GEP, GlobalVariable *GV,
// If the index is larger than the pointer size of the target, truncate the
// index down like the GEP would do implicitly. We don't have to do this for
// an inbounds GEP because the index can't be out of range.
- if (!GEP->isInBounds() &&
- Idx->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() > TD->getPointerSizeInBits())
- Idx = Builder->CreateTrunc(Idx, TD->getIntPtrType(Idx->getContext()));
+ if (!GEP->isInBounds()) {
+ Type *IntPtrTy = TD->getIntPtrType(GEP->getType());
+ unsigned PtrSize = IntPtrTy->getIntegerBitWidth();
+ if (Idx->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() > PtrSize)
+ Idx = Builder->CreateTrunc(Idx, IntPtrTy);
+ }
// If the comparison is only true for one or two elements, emit direct
// comparisons.
if (SecondTrueElement != Overdefined) {
// None true -> false.
if (FirstTrueElement == Undefined)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(GEP->getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
Value *FirstTrueIdx = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), FirstTrueElement);
@@ -422,7 +426,7 @@ FoldCmpLoadFromIndexedGlobal(GetElementPtrInst *GEP, GlobalVariable *GV,
if (SecondFalseElement != Overdefined) {
// None false -> true.
if (FirstFalseElement == Undefined)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getTrue(GEP->getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
Value *FirstFalseIdx = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), FirstFalseElement);
@@ -562,16 +566,18 @@ static Value *EvaluateGEPOffsetExpression(User *GEP, InstCombiner &IC) {
}
}
+
+
// Okay, we know we have a single variable index, which must be a
// pointer/array/vector index. If there is no offset, life is simple, return
// the index.
- unsigned IntPtrWidth = TD.getPointerSizeInBits();
+ Type *IntPtrTy = TD.getIntPtrType(GEP->getOperand(0)->getType());
+ unsigned IntPtrWidth = IntPtrTy->getIntegerBitWidth();
if (Offset == 0) {
// Cast to intptrty in case a truncation occurs. If an extension is needed,
// we don't need to bother extending: the extension won't affect where the
// computation crosses zero.
if (VariableIdx->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() > IntPtrWidth) {
- Type *IntPtrTy = TD.getIntPtrType(VariableIdx->getContext());
VariableIdx = IC.Builder->CreateTrunc(VariableIdx, IntPtrTy);
}
return VariableIdx;
@@ -593,7 +599,6 @@ static Value *EvaluateGEPOffsetExpression(User *GEP, InstCombiner &IC) {
return 0;
// Okay, we can do this evaluation. Start by converting the index to intptr.
- Type *IntPtrTy = TD.getIntPtrType(VariableIdx->getContext());
if (VariableIdx->getType() != IntPtrTy)
VariableIdx = IC.Builder->CreateIntCast(VariableIdx, IntPtrTy,
true /*Signed*/);
@@ -647,8 +652,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldGEPICmp(GEPOperator *GEPLHS, Value *RHS,
// If all indices are the same, just compare the base pointers.
if (IndicesTheSame)
- return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::getSignedPredicate(Cond),
- GEPLHS->getOperand(0), GEPRHS->getOperand(0));
+ return new ICmpInst(Cond, GEPLHS->getOperand(0), GEPRHS->getOperand(0));
// If we're comparing GEPs with two base pointers that only differ in type
// and both GEPs have only constant indices or just one use, then fold
@@ -679,7 +683,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldGEPICmp(GEPOperator *GEPLHS, Value *RHS,
}
if (AllZeros)
return FoldGEPICmp(GEPRHS, GEPLHS->getOperand(0),
- ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Cond), I);
+ ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Cond), I);
// If the other GEP has all zero indices, recurse.
AllZeros = true;
@@ -712,8 +716,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldGEPICmp(GEPOperator *GEPLHS, Value *RHS,
if (NumDifferences == 0) // SAME GEP?
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, // No comparison is needed here.
- ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(I.getContext()),
- ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Cond)));
+ Builder->getInt1(ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Cond)));
else if (NumDifferences == 1 && GEPsInBounds) {
Value *LHSV = GEPLHS->getOperand(DiffOperand);
@@ -739,10 +742,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldGEPICmp(GEPOperator *GEPLHS, Value *RHS,
}
/// FoldICmpAddOpCst - Fold "icmp pred (X+CI), X".
-Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpAddOpCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
+Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpAddOpCst(Instruction &ICI,
Value *X, ConstantInt *CI,
- ICmpInst::Predicate Pred,
- Value *TheAdd) {
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred) {
// If we have X+0, exit early (simplifying logic below) and let it get folded
// elsewhere. icmp X+0, X -> icmp X, X
if (CI->isZero()) {
@@ -752,11 +754,11 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpAddOpCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
// (X+4) == X -> false.
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(X->getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
// (X+4) != X -> true.
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getTrue(X->getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
// From this point on, we know that (X+C <= X) --> (X+C < X) because C != 0,
// so the values can never be equal. Similarly for all other "or equals"
@@ -798,7 +800,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpAddOpCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
// (X+ -1) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(-1-1)) --> X == -128
assert(Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE);
- Constant *C = ConstantInt::get(X->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1);
+ Constant *C = Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()-1);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, X, ConstantExpr::getSub(SMax, C));
}
@@ -921,7 +923,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpDivCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *DivI,
default: llvm_unreachable("Unhandled icmp opcode!");
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ:
if (LoOverflow && HiOverflow)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
if (HiOverflow)
return new ICmpInst(DivIsSigned ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE :
ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, X, LoBound);
@@ -932,7 +934,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpDivCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *DivI,
DivIsSigned, true));
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE:
if (LoOverflow && HiOverflow)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getTrue(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
if (HiOverflow)
return new ICmpInst(DivIsSigned ? ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT :
ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, X, LoBound);
@@ -944,16 +946,16 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpDivCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *DivI,
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
if (LoOverflow == +1) // Low bound is greater than input range.
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getTrue(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
if (LoOverflow == -1) // Low bound is less than input range.
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
return new ICmpInst(Pred, X, LoBound);
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT:
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
if (HiOverflow == +1) // High bound greater than input range.
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
if (HiOverflow == -1) // High bound less than input range.
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getTrue(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, X, HiBound);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, X, HiBound);
@@ -1017,7 +1019,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpShrCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *Shr,
// If we are comparing against bits always shifted out, the
// comparison cannot succeed.
APInt Comp = CmpRHSV << ShAmtVal;
- ConstantInt *ShiftedCmpRHS = ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), Comp);
+ ConstantInt *ShiftedCmpRHS = Builder->getInt(Comp);
if (Shr->getOpcode() == Instruction::LShr)
Comp = Comp.lshr(ShAmtVal);
else
@@ -1025,8 +1027,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpShrCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *Shr,
if (Comp != CmpRHSV) { // Comparing against a bit that we know is zero.
bool IsICMP_NE = ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
- Constant *Cst = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
- IsICMP_NE);
+ Constant *Cst = Builder->getInt1(IsICMP_NE);
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Cst);
}
@@ -1039,7 +1040,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpShrCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *Shr,
if (Shr->hasOneUse()) {
// Otherwise strength reduce the shift into an and.
APInt Val(APInt::getHighBitsSet(TypeBits, TypeBits - ShAmtVal));
- Constant *Mask = ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), Val);
+ Constant *Mask = Builder->getInt(Val);
Value *And = Builder->CreateAnd(Shr->getOperand(0),
Mask, Shr->getName()+".mask");
@@ -1072,7 +1073,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
APInt NewRHS = RHS->getValue().zext(SrcBits);
NewRHS |= KnownOne & APInt::getHighBitsSet(SrcBits, SrcBits-DstBits);
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), NewRHS));
+ Builder->getInt(NewRHS));
}
}
break;
@@ -1115,8 +1116,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
? ICI.getUnsignedPredicate()
: ICI.getSignedPredicate();
return new ICmpInst(Pred, LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(),
- RHSV ^ SignBit));
+ Builder->getInt(RHSV ^ SignBit));
}
// (icmp u/s (xor A ~SignBit), C) -> (icmp s/u (xor C ~SignBit), A)
@@ -1127,10 +1127,21 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
: ICI.getSignedPredicate();
Pred = ICI.getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
return new ICmpInst(Pred, LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(),
- RHSV ^ NotSignBit));
+ Builder->getInt(RHSV ^ NotSignBit));
}
}
+
+ // (icmp ugt (xor X, C), ~C) -> (icmp ult X, C)
+ // iff -C is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT &&
+ XorCST->getValue() == ~RHSV && (RHSV + 1).isPowerOf2())
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, LHSI->getOperand(0), XorCST);
+
+ // (icmp ult (xor X, C), -C) -> (icmp uge X, C)
+ // iff -C is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT &&
+ XorCST->getValue() == -RHSV && RHSV.isPowerOf2())
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHSI->getOperand(0), XorCST);
}
break;
case Instruction::And: // (icmp pred (and X, AndCST), RHS)
@@ -1187,11 +1198,16 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
Type *AndTy = AndCST->getType(); // Type of the and.
// We can fold this as long as we can't shift unknown bits
- // into the mask. This can only happen with signed shift
- // rights, as they sign-extend.
+ // into the mask. This can happen with signed shift
+ // rights, as they sign-extend. With logical shifts,
+ // we must still make sure the comparison is not signed
+ // because we are effectively changing the
+ // position of the sign bit (PR17827).
+ // TODO: We can relax these constraints a bit more.
if (ShAmt) {
- bool CanFold = Shift->isLogicalShift();
- if (!CanFold) {
+ bool CanFold = false;
+ unsigned ShiftOpcode = Shift->getOpcode();
+ if (ShiftOpcode == Instruction::AShr) {
// To test for the bad case of the signed shr, see if any
// of the bits shifted in could be tested after the mask.
uint32_t TyBits = Ty->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
@@ -1201,6 +1217,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
if ((APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-ShAmtVal) &
AndCST->getValue()) == 0)
CanFold = true;
+ } else if (ShiftOpcode == Instruction::Shl ||
+ ShiftOpcode == Instruction::LShr) {
+ CanFold = !ICI.isSigned();
}
if (CanFold) {
@@ -1218,11 +1237,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
// As a special case, check to see if this means that the
// result is always true or false now.
if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI,
- ConstantInt::getFalse(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI,
- ConstantInt::getTrue(ICI.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
} else {
ICI.setOperand(1, NewCst);
Constant *NewAndCST;
@@ -1284,6 +1301,15 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
return Res;
}
}
+
+ // X & -C == -C -> X > u ~C
+ // X & -C != -C -> X <= u ~C
+ // iff C is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.isEquality() && RHS == LHSI->getOperand(1) && (-RHSV).isPowerOf2())
+ return new ICmpInst(
+ ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT
+ : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE,
+ LHSI->getOperand(0), SubOne(RHS));
break;
case Instruction::Or: {
@@ -1325,10 +1351,80 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
}
case Instruction::Shl: { // (icmp pred (shl X, ShAmt), CI)
+ uint32_t TypeBits = RHSV.getBitWidth();
ConstantInt *ShAmt = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(1));
- if (!ShAmt) break;
+ if (!ShAmt) {
+ Value *X;
+ // (1 << X) pred P2 -> X pred Log2(P2)
+ if (match(LHSI, m_Shl(m_One(), m_Value(X)))) {
+ bool RHSVIsPowerOf2 = RHSV.isPowerOf2();
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICI.getPredicate();
+ if (ICI.isUnsigned()) {
+ if (!RHSVIsPowerOf2) {
+ // (1 << X) < 30 -> X <= 4
+ // (1 << X) <= 30 -> X <= 4
+ // (1 << X) >= 30 -> X > 4
+ // (1 << X) > 30 -> X > 4
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT)
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE;
+ else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE)
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT;
+ }
+ unsigned RHSLog2 = RHSV.logBase2();
+
+ // (1 << X) >= 2147483648 -> X >= 31 -> X == 31
+ // (1 << X) > 2147483648 -> X > 31 -> false
+ // (1 << X) <= 2147483648 -> X <= 31 -> true
+ // (1 << X) < 2147483648 -> X < 31 -> X != 31
+ if (RHSLog2 == TypeBits-1) {
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE)
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ;
+ else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT)
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getFalse());
+ else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE)
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getTrue());
+ else if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT)
+ Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
+ }
- uint32_t TypeBits = RHSV.getBitWidth();
+ return new ICmpInst(Pred, X,
+ ConstantInt::get(RHS->getType(), RHSLog2));
+ } else if (ICI.isSigned()) {
+ if (RHSV.isAllOnesValue()) {
+ // (1 << X) <= -1 -> X == 31
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, X,
+ ConstantInt::get(RHS->getType(), TypeBits-1));
+
+ // (1 << X) > -1 -> X != 31
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, X,
+ ConstantInt::get(RHS->getType(), TypeBits-1));
+ } else if (!RHSV) {
+ // (1 << X) < 0 -> X == 31
+ // (1 << X) <= 0 -> X == 31
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, X,
+ ConstantInt::get(RHS->getType(), TypeBits-1));
+
+ // (1 << X) >= 0 -> X != 31
+ // (1 << X) > 0 -> X != 31
+ if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, X,
+ ConstantInt::get(RHS->getType(), TypeBits-1));
+ }
+ } else if (ICI.isEquality()) {
+ if (RHSVIsPowerOf2)
+ return new ICmpInst(
+ Pred, X, ConstantInt::get(RHS->getType(), RHSV.logBase2()));
+
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(
+ ICI, Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ ? Builder->getFalse()
+ : Builder->getTrue());
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ }
// Check that the shift amount is in range. If not, don't perform
// undefined shifts. When the shift is visited it will be
@@ -1344,8 +1440,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
ShAmt);
if (Comp != RHS) {// Comparing against a bit that we know is zero.
bool IsICMP_NE = ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
- Constant *Cst =
- ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()), IsICMP_NE);
+ Constant *Cst = Builder->getInt1(IsICMP_NE);
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Cst);
}
@@ -1364,9 +1459,8 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
if (LHSI->hasOneUse()) {
// Otherwise strength reduce the shift into an and.
uint32_t ShAmtVal = (uint32_t)ShAmt->getLimitedValue(TypeBits);
- Constant *Mask =
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), APInt::getLowBitsSet(TypeBits,
- TypeBits-ShAmtVal));
+ Constant *Mask = Builder->getInt(APInt::getLowBitsSet(TypeBits,
+ TypeBits - ShAmtVal));
Value *And =
Builder->CreateAnd(LHSI->getOperand(0),Mask, LHSI->getName()+".mask");
@@ -1451,6 +1545,30 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
return R;
break;
+ case Instruction::Sub: {
+ ConstantInt *LHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(0));
+ if (!LHSC) break;
+ const APInt &LHSV = LHSC->getValue();
+
+ // C1-X <u C2 -> (X|(C2-1)) == C1
+ // iff C1 & (C2-1) == C2-1
+ // C2 is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && LHSI->hasOneUse() &&
+ RHSV.isPowerOf2() && (LHSV & (RHSV - 1)) == (RHSV - 1))
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ,
+ Builder->CreateOr(LHSI->getOperand(1), RHSV - 1),
+ LHSC);
+
+ // C1-X >u C2 -> (X|C2) != C1
+ // iff C1 & C2 == C2
+ // C2+1 is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT && LHSI->hasOneUse() &&
+ (RHSV + 1).isPowerOf2() && (LHSV & RHSV) == RHSV)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE,
+ Builder->CreateOr(LHSI->getOperand(1), RHSV), LHSC);
+ break;
+ }
+
case Instruction::Add:
// Fold: icmp pred (add X, C1), C2
if (!ICI.isEquality()) {
@@ -1464,20 +1582,38 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
if (ICI.isSigned()) {
if (CR.getLower().isSignBit()) {
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(),CR.getUpper()));
+ Builder->getInt(CR.getUpper()));
} else if (CR.getUpper().isSignBit()) {
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE, LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(),CR.getLower()));
+ Builder->getInt(CR.getLower()));
}
} else {
if (CR.getLower().isMinValue()) {
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(),CR.getUpper()));
+ Builder->getInt(CR.getUpper()));
} else if (CR.getUpper().isMinValue()) {
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE, LHSI->getOperand(0),
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(),CR.getLower()));
+ Builder->getInt(CR.getLower()));
}
}
+
+ // X-C1 <u C2 -> (X & -C2) == C1
+ // iff C1 & (C2-1) == 0
+ // C2 is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT && LHSI->hasOneUse() &&
+ RHSV.isPowerOf2() && (LHSV & (RHSV - 1)) == 0)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ,
+ Builder->CreateAnd(LHSI->getOperand(0), -RHSV),
+ ConstantExpr::getNeg(LHSC));
+
+ // X-C1 >u C2 -> (X & ~C2) != C1
+ // iff C1 & C2 == 0
+ // C2+1 is a power of 2
+ if (ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT && LHSI->hasOneUse() &&
+ (RHSV + 1).isPowerOf2() && (LHSV & RHSV) == 0)
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE,
+ Builder->CreateAnd(LHSI->getOperand(0), ~RHSV),
+ ConstantExpr::getNeg(LHSC));
}
break;
}
@@ -1555,9 +1691,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
if (ConstantInt *BOC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(1))) {
Constant *NotCI = ConstantExpr::getNot(RHS);
if (!ConstantExpr::getAnd(BOC, NotCI)->isNullValue())
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI,
- ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
- isICMP_NE));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getInt1(isICMP_NE));
}
break;
@@ -1566,9 +1700,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
// If bits are being compared against that are and'd out, then the
// comparison can never succeed!
if ((RHSV & ~BOC->getValue()) != 0)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI,
- ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
- isICMP_NE));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Builder->getInt1(isICMP_NE));
// If we have ((X & C) == C), turn it into ((X & C) != 0).
if (RHS == BOC && RHSV.isPowerOf2())
@@ -1619,7 +1751,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(ICmpInst &ICI,
case Intrinsic::bswap:
Worklist.Add(II);
ICI.setOperand(0, II->getArgOperand(0));
- ICI.setOperand(1, ConstantInt::get(II->getContext(), RHSV.byteSwap()));
+ ICI.setOperand(1, Builder->getInt(RHSV.byteSwap()));
return &ICI;
case Intrinsic::ctlz:
case Intrinsic::cttz:
@@ -1661,8 +1793,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInstWithCastAndCast(ICmpInst &ICI) {
// Turn icmp (ptrtoint x), (ptrtoint/c) into a compare of the input if the
// integer type is the same size as the pointer type.
if (TD && LHSCI->getOpcode() == Instruction::PtrToInt &&
- TD->getPointerSizeInBits() ==
- cast<IntegerType>(DestTy)->getBitWidth()) {
+ TD->getPointerTypeSizeInBits(SrcTy) == DestTy->getIntegerBitWidth()) {
Value *RHSOp = 0;
if (Constant *RHSC = dyn_cast<Constant>(ICI.getOperand(1))) {
RHSOp = ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(RHSC, SrcTy);
@@ -1915,14 +2046,59 @@ static APInt DemandedBitsLHSMask(ICmpInst &I,
}
+/// \brief Check if the order of \p Op0 and \p Op1 as operand in an ICmpInst
+/// should be swapped.
+/// The descision is based on how many times these two operands are reused
+/// as subtract operands and their positions in those instructions.
+/// The rational is that several architectures use the same instruction for
+/// both subtract and cmp, thus it is better if the order of those operands
+/// match.
+/// \return true if Op0 and Op1 should be swapped.
+static bool swapMayExposeCSEOpportunities(const Value * Op0,
+ const Value * Op1) {
+ // Filter out pointer value as those cannot appears directly in subtract.
+ // FIXME: we may want to go through inttoptrs or bitcasts.
+ if (Op0->getType()->isPointerTy())
+ return false;
+ // Count every uses of both Op0 and Op1 in a subtract.
+ // Each time Op0 is the first operand, count -1: swapping is bad, the
+ // subtract has already the same layout as the compare.
+ // Each time Op0 is the second operand, count +1: swapping is good, the
+ // subtract has a diffrent layout as the compare.
+ // At the end, if the benefit is greater than 0, Op0 should come second to
+ // expose more CSE opportunities.
+ int GlobalSwapBenefits = 0;
+ for (Value::const_use_iterator UI = Op0->use_begin(), UIEnd = Op0->use_end(); UI != UIEnd; ++UI) {
+ const BinaryOperator *BinOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(*UI);
+ if (!BinOp || BinOp->getOpcode() != Instruction::Sub)
+ continue;
+ // If Op0 is the first argument, this is not beneficial to swap the
+ // arguments.
+ int LocalSwapBenefits = -1;
+ unsigned Op1Idx = 1;
+ if (BinOp->getOperand(Op1Idx) == Op0) {
+ Op1Idx = 0;
+ LocalSwapBenefits = 1;
+ }
+ if (BinOp->getOperand(Op1Idx) != Op1)
+ continue;
+ GlobalSwapBenefits += LocalSwapBenefits;
+ }
+ return GlobalSwapBenefits > 0;
+}
+
Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
bool Changed = false;
Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1);
+ unsigned Op0Cplxity = getComplexity(Op0);
+ unsigned Op1Cplxity = getComplexity(Op1);
/// Orders the operands of the compare so that they are listed from most
/// complex to least complex. This puts constants before unary operators,
/// before binary operators.
- if (getComplexity(Op0) < getComplexity(Op1)) {
+ if (Op0Cplxity < Op1Cplxity ||
+ (Op0Cplxity == Op1Cplxity &&
+ swapMayExposeCSEOpportunities(Op0, Op1))) {
I.swapOperands();
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
Changed = true;
@@ -2041,19 +2217,19 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
assert(!CI->isMaxValue(false)); // A <=u MAX -> TRUE
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()+1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()+1));
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
assert(!CI->isMaxValue(true)); // A <=s MAX -> TRUE
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()+1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()+1));
case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
assert(!CI->isMinValue(false)); // A >=u MIN -> TRUE
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()-1));
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
assert(!CI->isMinValue(true)); // A >=s MIN -> TRUE
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()-1));
}
// If this comparison is a normal comparison, it demands all
@@ -2192,7 +2368,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
if (Op1Max == Op0Min+1) // A <u C -> A == C-1 if min(A)+1 == C
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()-1));
// (x <u 2147483648) -> (x >s -1) -> true if sign bit clear
if (CI->isMinValue(true))
@@ -2211,7 +2387,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
if (Op1Min == Op0Max-1) // A >u C -> A == C+1 if max(a)-1 == C
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()+1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()+1));
// (x >u 2147483647) -> (x <s 0) -> true if sign bit set
if (CI->isMaxValue(true))
@@ -2229,7 +2405,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
if (Op1Max == Op0Min+1) // A <s C -> A == C-1 if min(A)+1 == C
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()-1));
}
break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
@@ -2243,7 +2419,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
if (Op1Min == Op0Max-1) // A >s C -> A == C+1 if max(A)-1 == C
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Op0,
- ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()+1));
+ Builder->getInt(CI->getValue()+1));
}
break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
@@ -2357,7 +2533,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
case Instruction::IntToPtr:
// icmp pred inttoptr(X), null -> icmp pred X, 0
if (RHSC->isNullValue() && TD &&
- TD->getIntPtrType(RHSC->getContext()) ==
+ TD->getIntPtrType(RHSC->getType()) ==
LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType())
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), LHSI->getOperand(0),
Constant::getNullValue(LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType()));
@@ -2719,8 +2895,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
ConstantInt *C1, *C2;
if (match(B, m_ConstantInt(C1)) &&
match(D, m_ConstantInt(C2)) && Op1->hasOneUse()) {
- Constant *NC = ConstantInt::get(I.getContext(),
- C1->getValue() ^ C2->getValue());
+ Constant *NC = Builder->getInt(C1->getValue() ^ C2->getValue());
Value *Xor = Builder->CreateXor(C, NC);
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), A, Xor);
}
@@ -2781,6 +2956,24 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
Builder->CreateTrunc(B, A->getType()));
}
+ // (A >> C) == (B >> C) --> (A^B) u< (1 << C)
+ // For lshr and ashr pairs.
+ if ((match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_LShr(m_Value(A), m_ConstantInt(Cst1)))) &&
+ match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_LShr(m_Value(B), m_Specific(Cst1))))) ||
+ (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_AShr(m_Value(A), m_ConstantInt(Cst1)))) &&
+ match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_AShr(m_Value(B), m_Specific(Cst1)))))) {
+ unsigned TypeBits = Cst1->getBitWidth();
+ unsigned ShAmt = (unsigned)Cst1->getLimitedValue(TypeBits);
+ if (ShAmt < TypeBits && ShAmt != 0) {
+ ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = I.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE
+ ? ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE
+ : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
+ Value *Xor = Builder->CreateXor(A, B, I.getName() + ".unshifted");
+ APInt CmpVal = APInt::getOneBitSet(TypeBits, ShAmt);
+ return new ICmpInst(Pred, Xor, Builder->getInt(CmpVal));
+ }
+ }
+
// Transform "icmp eq (trunc (lshr(X, cst1)), cst" to
// "icmp (and X, mask), cst"
uint64_t ShAmt = 0;
@@ -2811,20 +3004,15 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
Value *X; ConstantInt *Cst;
// icmp X+Cst, X
if (match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_ConstantInt(Cst))) && Op1 == X)
- return FoldICmpAddOpCst(I, X, Cst, I.getPredicate(), Op0);
+ return FoldICmpAddOpCst(I, X, Cst, I.getPredicate());
// icmp X, X+Cst
if (match(Op1, m_Add(m_Value(X), m_ConstantInt(Cst))) && Op0 == X)
- return FoldICmpAddOpCst(I, X, Cst, I.getSwappedPredicate(), Op1);
+ return FoldICmpAddOpCst(I, X, Cst, I.getSwappedPredicate());
}
return Changed ? &I : 0;
}
-
-
-
-
-
/// FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst - Fold fcmp ([us]itofp x, cst) if possible.
///
Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
@@ -2885,9 +3073,9 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
break;
case FCmpInst::FCMP_ORD:
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
case FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO:
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
}
IntegerType *IntTy = cast<IntegerType>(LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType());
@@ -2901,50 +3089,50 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
if (!LHSUnsigned) {
// If the RHS value is > SignedMax, fold the comparison. This handles +INF
// and large values.
- APFloat SMax(RHS.getSemantics(), APFloat::fcZero, false);
+ APFloat SMax(RHS.getSemantics());
SMax.convertFromAPInt(APInt::getSignedMaxValue(IntWidth), true,
APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven);
if (SMax.compare(RHS) == APFloat::cmpLessThan) { // smax < 13123.0
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT ||
Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
}
} else {
// If the RHS value is > UnsignedMax, fold the comparison. This handles
// +INF and large values.
- APFloat UMax(RHS.getSemantics(), APFloat::fcZero, false);
+ APFloat UMax(RHS.getSemantics());
UMax.convertFromAPInt(APInt::getMaxValue(IntWidth), false,
APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven);
if (UMax.compare(RHS) == APFloat::cmpLessThan) { // umax < 13123.0
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT ||
Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
}
}
if (!LHSUnsigned) {
// See if the RHS value is < SignedMin.
- APFloat SMin(RHS.getSemantics(), APFloat::fcZero, false);
+ APFloat SMin(RHS.getSemantics());
SMin.convertFromAPInt(APInt::getSignedMinValue(IntWidth), true,
APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven);
if (SMin.compare(RHS) == APFloat::cmpGreaterThan) { // smin > 12312.0
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT ||
Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
}
} else {
// See if the RHS value is < UnsignedMin.
- APFloat SMin(RHS.getSemantics(), APFloat::fcZero, false);
+ APFloat SMin(RHS.getSemantics());
SMin.convertFromAPInt(APInt::getMinValue(IntWidth), true,
APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven);
if (SMin.compare(RHS) == APFloat::cmpGreaterThan) { // umin > 12312.0
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT ||
Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE)
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
}
}
@@ -2966,14 +3154,14 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
switch (Pred) {
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected integer comparison!");
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: // (float)int != 4.4 --> true
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ: // (float)int == 4.4 --> false
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE:
// (float)int <= 4.4 --> int <= 4
// (float)int <= -4.4 --> false
if (RHS.isNegative())
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE:
// (float)int <= 4.4 --> int <= 4
@@ -2985,7 +3173,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
// (float)int < -4.4 --> false
// (float)int < 4.4 --> int <= 4
if (RHS.isNegative())
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getFalse());
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE;
break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT:
@@ -2998,7 +3186,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
// (float)int > 4.4 --> int > 4
// (float)int > -4.4 --> true
if (RHS.isNegative())
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT:
// (float)int > 4.4 --> int > 4
@@ -3010,7 +3198,7 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldFCmp_IntToFP_Cst(FCmpInst &I,
// (float)int >= -4.4 --> true
// (float)int >= 4.4 --> int > 4
if (RHS.isNegative())
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getContext()));
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, Builder->getTrue());
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT;
break;
case ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE:
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud