summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zpu/roadshow/roadshow/dhrystone/dhry-c
blob: 4cec46c5f77705ea9c88ec7a9fda6ac4c39b126d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
# to unbundle, sh this file (in an empty directory)
echo RATIONALE 1>&2
sed >RATIONALE <<'//GO.SYSIN DD RATIONALE' 's/^-//'
-
-
-    Dhrystone Benchmark: Rationale for Version 2 and Measurement Rules
-
-        [published in SIGPLAN Notices 23,8 (Aug. 1988), 49-62]
-
-
-                 Reinhold P. Weicker
-                 Siemens AG, E STE 35
-                 [now: Siemens AG, AUT E 51]
-                 Postfach 3220
-                 D-8520 Erlangen
-                 Germany (West)
-
-
-
-
-1.  Why a Version 2 of Dhrystone?
-
-The Dhrystone benchmark  program  [1]  has  become  a  popular  benchmark  for
-CPU/compiler   performance   measurement,   in   particular  in  the  area  of
-minicomputers, workstations, PC's and microprocesors.  It apparently satisfies
-a  need  for  an  easy-to-use  integer benchmark; it gives a first performance
-indication which is more meaningful than MIPS numbers which, in their  literal
-meaning  (million  instructions  per  second), cannot be used across different
-instruction sets (e.g. RISC  vs.  CISC).   With  the  increasing  use  of  the
-benchmark, it seems necessary to reconsider the benchmark and to check whether
-it can still fulfill this function.  Version 2 of Dhrystone is the  result  of
-such a re-evaluation, it has been made for two reasons:
-
-o Dhrystone has been published in Ada [1], and Versions in Ada, Pascal  and  C
-  have  been  distributed  by  Reinhold Weicker via floppy disk.  However, the
-  version that was used most often for benchmarking has been the version  made
-  by  Rick  Richardson  by another translation from the Ada version into the C
-  programming language, this has been the version  distributed  via  the  UNIX
-  network Usenet [2].
-
-  There is an obvious need for a common C version of Dhrystone, since C is  at
-  present  the  most  popular  system  programming  language  for the class of
-  systems (microcomputers, minicomputers,  workstations)  where  Dhrystone  is
-  used  most.   There  should  be,  as  far as possible, only one C version of
-  Dhrystone such that results can be compared  without  restrictions.  In  the
-  past,  the  C  versions  distributed by Rick Richardson (Version 1.1) and by
-  Reinhold Weicker had small (though not significant) differences.
-
-  Together with the new C version, the  Ada  and  Pascal  versions  have  been
-  updated as well.
-
-o As far as it is  possible  without  changes  to  the  Dhrystone  statistics,
-  optimizing   compilers   should   be  prevented  from  removing  significant
-  statements.  It has  turned  out  in  the  past  that  optimizing  compilers
-  suppressed  code  generation for too many statements (by "dead code removal"
-  or  "dead  variable  elimination").   This  has  lead  to  the  danger  that
-  benchmarking  results obtained by a naive application of Dhrystone - without
-  inspection of the code that was generated - could become meaningless.
-
-The  overall  policiy  for  version  2  has  been  that  the  distribution  of
-statements,  operand types and operand locality described in [1] should remain
-unchanged as much as possible.  (Very few changes were necessary; their impact
-should be negligible.)  Also, the order of statements should remain unchanged.
-Although I am aware of some critical remarks on the benchmark - I  agree  with
-several  of them - and know some suggestions for improvement, I didn't want to
-change the benchmark into something different from what has  become  known  as
-"Dhrystone"; the confusion generated by such a change would probably outweight
-the benefits. If I were to write a new benchmark program, I wouldn't  give  it
-the  name  "Dhrystone"  since  this  denotes  the  program  published  in [1].
-However, I do recognize  the  need  for  a  larger  number  of  representative
-programs  that can be used as benchmarks; users should always be encouraged to
-use more than just one benchmark.
-
-The new versions (version 2.1 for C, Pascal and Ada) will  be  distributed  as
-widely as possible.  (Version 2.1 differs from version 2.0 distributed via the
-UNIX Network Usenet in  March  1988  only  in  a  few  corrections  for  minor
-deficiencies  found  by  users  of  version 2.0.)  Readers who want to use the
-benchmark for their own measurements can obtain  a  copy  in  machine-readable
-form on floppy disk (MS-DOS or XENIX format) from the author.
-
-
-2.  Overall Characteristics of Version 2
-
-In general, version 2  follows  -  in  the  parts  that  are  significant  for
-performance  measurement,  i.e.   within  the measurement loop - the published
-(Ada) version and the C versions previously distributed.  Where  the  versions
-distributed  by  Rick Richardson [2] and Reinhold Weicker have been different,
-it  follows  the  version  distributed  by  Reinhold  Weicker.  (However,  the
-differences  have  been  so  small  that their impact on execution time in all
-likelihood has been negligible.)  The initialization and UNIX  instrumentation
-part  -  which  had  been  omitted  in  [1] - follows mostly the ideas of Rick
-Richardson [2].  However, any changes in the initialization part  and  in  the
-printing  of  the  result have no impact on performance measurement since they
-are outside the measaurement loop.  As a concession to older compilers,  names
-have been made unique within the first 8 characters for the C version.
-
-The original publication of Dhrystone did not contain any statements for  time
-measurement  since  they  are necessarily system-dependent. However, it turned
-out that it is not enough just to inclose the main procedure of Dhrystone in a
-loop  and  to  measure the execution time.  If the variables that are computed
-are not used somehow, there is the danger that the compiler considers them  as
-"dead  variables" and suppresses code generation for a part of the statements.
-Therefore in version 2 all variables of "main" are printed at the end  of  the
-program.  This also permits some plausibility control for correct execution of
-the benchmark.
-
-At several places in the benchmark, code has been added, but only in  branches
-that  are  not  executed. The intention is that optimizing compilers should be
-prevented from moving code out of the measurement loop, or from removing  code
-altogether.  Statements that are executed have been changed in very few places
-only.  In these cases, only the role of some operands has been changed, and it
-was   made  sure  that  the  numbers  defining  the  "Dhrystone  distribution"
-(distribution of statements, operand types and locality) still hold as much as
-possible.   Except for sophisticated optimizing compilers, execution times for
-version 2.1 should be the same as for previous versions.
-
-Because of the self-imposed limitation that the order and distribution of  the
-executed  statements  should  not  be  changed,  there  are  still cases where
-optimizing compilers may not generate code for some statements. To  a  certain
-degree,  this  is  unavoidable  for  small synthetic benchmarks.  Users of the
-benchmark are advised to check code listings whether code is generated for all
-statements of Dhrystone.
-
-Contrary to the suggestion in the published paper and its realization  in  the
-versions previously distributed, no attempt has been made to subtract the time
-for the measurement loop overhead. (This calculation has proven  difficult  to
-implement  in  a  correct  way,  and  its omission makes the program simpler.)
-However, since the loop check is now part of the benchmark, this does have  an
-impact  -  though a very minor one - on the distribution statistics which have
-been updated for this version.
-
-
-3.  Discussion of Individual Changes
-
-In this section, all changes are described that affect  the  measurement  loop
-and  that  are  not  just  renamings  of variables. All remarks refer to the C
-version; the other language versions have been updated similarly.
-
-In addition to adding  the  measurement  loop  and  the  printout  statements,
-changes have been made at the following places:
-
-o In procedure "main", three statements have been added  in  the  non-executed
-  "then" part of the statement
-
-        if (Enum_Loc == Func_1 (Ch_Index, 'C'))
-
-  they are
-
-        strcpy (Str_2_Loc, "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 3'RD STRING");
-        Int_2_Loc = Run_Index;
-        Int_Glob = Run_Index;
-
-  The string assignment prevents  movement  of  the  preceding  assignment  to
-  Str_2_Loc  (5'th  statement  of  "main")  out  of the measurement loop (This
-  probably will not happen for the C version, but it did happen  with  another
-  language   and  compiler.)   The  assignment  to  Int_2_Loc  prevents  value
-  propagation for Int_2_Loc, and the assignment to Int_Glob makes the value of
-  Int_Glob possibly dependent from the value of Run_Index.
-
-o In the three arithmetic computations at the end of the measurement  loop  in
-  "main  ",  the  role  of  some  variables has been exchanged, to prevent the
-  division from just cancelling out the multiplication as it was  in  [1].   A
-  very   smart  compiler  might  have  recognized  this  and  suppressed  code
-  generation for the division.
-
-o For Proc_2, no code has been changed, but the values of the actual parameter
-  have changed due to changes in "main".
-
-o In Proc_4, the second assignment has been changed from
-
-        Bool_Loc = Bool_Loc | Bool_Glob;
-
-  to
-
-        Bool_Glob = Bool_Loc | Bool_Glob;
-
-  It now assigns a value to a global variable  instead  of  a  local  variable
-  (Bool_Loc);   Bool_Loc  would  be  a  "dead  variable"  which  is  not  used
-  afterwards.
-
-o In Func_1, the statement
-
-        Ch_1_Glob = Ch_1_Loc;
-
-  was added in the non-executed "else" part of the "if" statement, to  prevent
-  the suppression of code generation for the assignment to Ch_1_Loc.
-
-o In Func_2, the second character comparison statement has been changed to
-
-        if (Ch_Loc == 'R')
-
-  ('R' instead of 'X') because  a  comparison  with  'X'  is  implied  in  the
-  preceding "if" statement.
-
-  Also in Func_2, the statement
-
-        Int_Glob = Int_Loc;
-
-  has been added in the non-executed part of the last "if" statement, in order
-  to prevent Int_Loc from becoming a dead variable.
-
-o In Func_3, a non-executed "else" part has been added to the "if"  statement.
-  While  the  program  would  not be incorrect without this "else" part, it is
-  considered bad programming practice if a function  can  be  left  without  a
-  return value.
-
-  To compensate for this change, the (non-executed) "else" part  in  the  "if"
-  statement of Proc_3 was removed.
-
-The distribution statistics have been changed only  by  the  addition  of  the
-measurement loop iteration (1 additional statement, 4 additional local integer
-operands) and by the change in Proc_4  (one  operand  changed  from  local  to
-global).  The distribution statistics in the comment headers have been updated
-accordingly.
-
-
-4.  String Operations
-
-The string operations (string assignment and string comparison) have not  been
-changed, to keep the program consistent with the original version.
-
-There has been some concern that the string operations are over-represented in
-the  program,  and that execution time is dominated by these operations.  This
-was true in particular when optimizing compilers removed too much code in  the
-main part of the program, this should have been mitigated in version 2.
-
-It should be noted that this is a  language-dependent  issue:   Dhrystone  was
-first  published  in  Ada, and with Ada or Pascal semantics, the time spent in
-the string operations is,  at  least  in  all  implementations  known  to  me,
-considerably smaller.  In Ada and Pascal, assignment and comparison of strings
-are operators defined in the language, and the upper  bounds  of  the  strings
-occuring  in  Dhrystone  are part of the type information known at compilation
-time.  The compilers can therefore generate  efficient  inline  code.   In  C,
-string  assignemt  and comparisons are not part of the language, so the string
-operations must be expressed in terms of the C library functions "strcpy"  and
-"strcmp".   (ANSI  C  allows  an  implementation  to use inline code for these
-functions.)  In addition to the overhead caused by additional function  calls,
-these  functions  are  defined for null-terminated strings where the length of
-the strings is not known at compilation time; the function has to check  every
-byte for the termination condition (the null byte).
-
-Obviously, a C library which includes efficiently coded "strcpy" and  "strcmp"
-functions  helps to obtain good Dhrystone results. However, I don't think that
-this is unfair since string  functions  do  occur  quite  frequently  in  real
-programs  (editors, command interpreters, etc.).  If the strings functions are
-implemented efficiently,  this  helps  real  programs  as  well  as  benchmark
-programs.
-
-I admit that the  string  comparison  in  Dhrystone  terminates  later  (after
-scanning  20  characters)  than most string comparisons in real programs.  For
-consistency with the original benchmark, I didn't change the  program  despite
-this weakness.
-
-
-5.  Intended Use of Dhrystone
-
-When Dhrystone is used, the following "ground rules" apply:
-
-o Separate compilation (Ada and C versions)
-
-  As mentioned in [1], Dhrystone was written  to  reflect  actual  programming
-  practice  in  systems  programming.   The  division into several compilation
-  units (5 in the Ada version, 2 in the C version)  is  intended,  as  is  the
-  distribution of inter-module and intra-module subprogram calls.  Although on
-  many systems there will be no difference in execution time  to  a  Dhrystone
-  version  where  all  compilation units are merged into one file, the rule is
-  that separate compilation should  be  used.   The  intention  is  that  real
-  programming  practice,  where  programs  consist  of  several  independently
-  compiled units, should  be  reflected.   This  also  has  implies  that  the
-  compiler,  while  compiling  one  unit,  has no information about the use of
-  variables, register allocation etc.  occuring in  other  compilation  units.
-  Although  in  real  life  compilation  units  will  probably  be larger, the
-  intention is that these effects  of  separate  compilation  are  modeled  in
-  Dhrystone.
-
-  A few language systems have post-linkage optimization available (e.g., final
-  register allocation is performed after linkage).  This is a borderline case:
-  Post-linkage  optimization  involves  additional  program  preparation  time
-  (although  not  as  much  as  compilation in one unit) which may prevent its
-  general use in practical programming.  I think that  since  it  defeats  the
-  intentions given above, it should not be used for Dhrystone.
-
-  Unfortunately, ISO/ANSI  Pascal  does  not  contain  language  features  for
-  separate  compilation.   Although  most  commercial Pascal compilers provide
-  separate compilation in some way, we cannot use it for Dhrystone since  such
-  a  version  would  not  be portable.  Therefore, no attempt has been made to
-  provide a Pascal version with several compilation units.
-
-o No procedure merging
-
-  Although Dhrystone contains some very short procedures where execution would
-  benefit  from  procedure  merging (inlining, macro expansion of procedures),
-  procedure merging is not to be used.  The reason is that the  percentage  of
-  procedure  and  function  calls  is  part of the "Dhrystone distribution" of
-  statements contained in [1].  This restriction does not hold for the  string
-  functions  of  the  C  version  since ANSI C allows an implementation to use
-  inline code for these functions.
-
-o Other optimizations are allowed, but they should be indicated
-
-  It is often hard to draw an exact line between "normal code generation"  and
-  "optimization"  in  compilers:  Some compilers perform operations by default
-  that are invoked in other compilers only  when  optimization  is  explicitly
-  requested.  Also, we cannot avoid that in benchmarking people try to achieve
-  results that look as good as possible.  Therefore,  optimizations  performed
-  by  compilers  -  other  than  those  listed  above - are not forbidden when
-  Dhrystone execution times are measured.  Dhrystone is  not  intended  to  be
-  non-optimizable  but  is  intended  to  be  similarly  optimizable as normal
-  programs.   For  example,  there  are  several  places  in  Dhrystone  where
-  performance   benefits   from   optimizations   like   common  subexpression
-  elimination, value  propagation  etc.,  but  normal  programs  usually  also
-  benefit  from  these  optimizations.   Therefore,  no  effort  was  made  to
-  artificially  prevent  such  optimizations.   However,  measurement  reports
-  should  indicate  which  compiler  optimization  levels  have been used, and
-  reporting results with different levels of  compiler  optimization  for  the
-  same hardware is encouraged.
-
-o Default results are those without "register" declarations (C version)
-
-  When Dhrystone results are quoted  without  additional  qualification,  they
-  should  be  understood  as  results  obtained  without use of the "register"
-  attribute. Good compilers should be able to make good use of registers  even
-  without explicit register declarations ([3], p. 193).
-
-Of course, for experimental  purposes,  post-linkage  optimization,  procedure
-merging and/or compilation in one unit can be done to determine their effects.
-However,  Dhrystone  numbers  obtained  under  these  conditions   should   be
-explicitly  marked as such; "normal" Dhrystone results should be understood as
-results obtained following the ground rules listed above.
-
-In any case, for serious performance evaluation, users are advised to ask  for
-code  listings  and  to  check  them carefully.  In this way, when results for
-different systems are  compared,  the  reader  can  get  a  feeling  how  much
-performance  difference is due to compiler optimization and how much is due to
-hardware speed.
-
-
-6.  Acknowledgements
-
-The C version 2.1 of Dhrystone has been developed  in  cooperation  with  Rick
-Richardson  (Tinton  Falls,  NJ), it incorporates many ideas from the "Version
-1.1" distributed previously by him over the UNIX network Usenet.  Through  his
-activity with Usenet, Rick Richardson has made a very valuable contribution to
-the dissemination of the benchmark.  I also thank  Chaim  Benedelac  (National
-Semiconductor),  David Ditzel (SUN), Earl Killian and John Mashey (MIPS), Alan
-Smith and Rafael  Saavedra-Barrera  (UC  at  Berkeley)  for  their  help  with
-comments on earlier versions of the benchmark.
-
-
-7.  Bibliography
-
-[1]
-   Reinhold P. Weicker: Dhrystone: A Synthetic Systems Programming Benchmark.
-   Communications of the ACM 27, 10 (Oct. 1984), 1013-1030
-
-[2]
-   Rick Richardson: Dhrystone 1.1 Benchmark Summary (and Program Text)
-   Informal Distribution via "Usenet", Last Version Known  to  me:  Sept.  21,
-   1987
-
-[3]
-   Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie:  The C Programming Language.
-   Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ) 1978
-
//GO.SYSIN DD RATIONALE
echo README_C 1>&2
sed >README_C <<'//GO.SYSIN DD README_C' 's/^-//'
-This "shar" file contains the documentation for the
-electronic mail distribution of the Dhrystone benchmark (C version 2.1);
-a companion "shar" file contains the source code.
-(Because of mail length restrictions for some mailers, I have
-split the distribution in two parts.)
-
-For versions in other languages, see the other "shar" files.
-
-Files containing the C version (*.h: Header File, *.c: C Modules)
-
-  dhry.h
-  dhry_1.c
-  dhry_2.c
-  
-The file RATIONALE contains the article 
-
-  "Dhrystone Benchmark: Rationale for Version 2 and Measurement Rules"
-
-which has been published, together with the C source code (Version 2.0),
-in SIGPLAN Notices vol. 23, no. 8 (Aug. 1988), pp. 49-62.
-This article explains all changes that have been made for Version 2,
-compared with the version of the original publication
-in Communications of the ACM vol. 27, no. 10 (Oct. 1984), pp. 1013-1030.
-It also contains "ground rules" for benchmarking with Dhrystone
-which should be followed by everyone who uses the program and publishes
-Dhrystone results.
-
-Compared with the Version 2.0 published in SIGPLAN Notices, Version 2.1
-contains a few corrections that have been made after Version 2.0 was
-distriobuted over the UNIX network Usenet. These small differences between
-Version 2.0 and 2.1 should not affect execution time measurements.
-For those who want to compare the exact contents of both versions,
-the file "dhry_c.dif" contains the differences between the two versions,
-as generated by a file comparison of the corresponding files with the
-UNIX utility "diff".
-
-The file VARIATIONS contains the article
-
-  "Understanding Variations in Dhrystone Performance"
-
-which has been published in Microprocessor Report, May 1989
-(Editor: M. Slater), pp. 16-17. It describes the points that users
-should know if C Dhrystone results are compared.
-
-Recipients of this shar file who perform measurements are asked
-to send measurement results to the author and/or to Rick Richardson.
-Rick Richardson publishes regularly Dhrystone results on the UNIX network
-Usenet. For submissions of results to him (preferably by electronic mail,
-see address in the program header), he has provided a form which is contained
-in the file "submit.frm".
-
-
-The following files are contained in other "shar" files:
-
-Files containing the Ada version (*.s: Specifications, *.b: Bodies):
-
-  d_global.s
-  d_main.b
-  d_pack_1.b
-  d_pack_1.s
-  d_pack_2.b
-  d_pack_2.s
-
-File containing the Pascal version:
-
-  dhry.p
-
-
-February 22, 1990
-
-                 Reinhold P. Weicker
-                 Siemens AG, AUT E 51
-                 Postfach 3220
-                 D-8520 Erlangen
-                 Germany (West)
-
-                 Phone:  [xxx-49]-9131-7-20330  (8-17 Central European Time)
-                 UUCP:   ..!mcsun!unido!estevax!weicker
//GO.SYSIN DD README_C
echo VARIATIONS 1>&2
sed >VARIATIONS <<'//GO.SYSIN DD VARIATIONS' 's/^-//'
-
-            Understanding Variations in Dhrystone Performance
-
-
-
-          By Reinhold P. Weicker, Siemens AG, AUT E 51, Erlangen
-
-
-
-                                April 1989
-
-
-                      This article has appeared in:
-
-
-        Microprocessor Report, May 1989 (Editor: M. Slater), pp. 16-17
-
-
-
-
-Microprocessor manufacturers tend to credit all the  performance  measured  by
-benchmarks to the speed of their processors, they often don't even mention the
-programming language and compiler used. In their detailed  documents,  usually
-called  "performance brief" or "performance report," they usually do give more
-details. However, these details are often lost in the press releases and other
-marketing  statements.  For serious performance evaluation, it is necessary to
-study the code generated by the various compilers.
-
-Dhrystone was originally published in Ada (Communications  of  the  ACM,  Oct.
-1984).  However, since good Ada compilers were rare at this time and, together
-with UNIX, C became more and more popular, the C version of Dhrystone  is  the
-one  now  mainly  used in industry. There are "official" versions 2.1 for Ada,
-Pascal, and C,  which  are  as  close  together  as  the  languages'  semantic
-differences permit.
-
-Dhrystone contains two statements  where  the  programming  language  and  its
-translation play a major part in the execution time measured by the benchmark:
-
-  o   String assignment (in procedure Proc_0 / main)
-  o   String comparison (in function Func_2)
-
-In Ada and Pascal, strings are arrays of characters where the  length  of  the
-string  is  part  of the type information known at compile time. In C, strings
-are also arrays of characters, but there  are  no  operators  defined  in  the
-language  for  assignment  and  comparison  of  strings.   Instead,  functions
-"strcpy" and "strcmp" are used. These functions are  defined  for  strings  of
-arbitrary  length, and make use of the fact that strings in C have to end with
-a terminating null byte. For general-purpose calls  to  these  functions,  the
-implementor  can  assume  nothing  about  the  length and the alignment of the
-strings involved.
-
-The C version of Dhrystone spends a relatively large amount of time  in  these
-two  functions.  Some  time  ago, I made measurements on a VAX 11/785 with the
-Berkeley UNIX (4.2) compilers (often-used compilers,  but  certainly  not  the
-most  advanced).  In  the  C  version, 23% of the time was spent in the string
-functions; in the Pascal version, only 10%. On good RISC machines (where  less
-time is spent in the procedure calling sequence than on a VAX) and with better
-optimizing compilers, the percentage is higher; MIPS has reported 34%  for  an
-R3000.   Because  of this effect, Pascal and Ada Dhrystone results are usually
-better than C results (except when the optimization quality of the C  compiler
-is considerably better than that of the other compilers).
-
-Several people have noted that the string operations are  over-represented  in
-Dhrystone,  mainly  because the strings occurring in Dhrystone are longer than
-average strings. I admit that this is true, and have said  so  in  my  SIGPLAN
-Notices  paper  (Aug.  1988);  however, I didn't want to generate confusion by
-changing the string lengths from version 1 to version 2.
-
-Even if they are somewhat over-represented in Dhrystone, string operations are
-frequent  enough  that  it makes sense to implement them in the most efficient
-way possible, not only for benchmarking purposes.  This means  that  they  can
-and should be written in assembly language code. ANSI C also explicitly allows
-the strings functions to be implemented as macros, i.e. by inline code.
-
-There is also a third way to speed up the "strcpy" statement in Dhrystone: For
-this  particular  "strcpy" statement, the source of the assignment is a string
-constant. Therefore, in contrast to calls to "strcpy" in the general case, the
-compiler  knows  the  length  and alignment of the strings involved at compile
-time and can generate code in the same efficient  way  as  a  Pascal  compiler
-(word instructions instead of byte instructions).
-
-This is not allowed in the case of the "strcmp" call: Here, the addresses  are
-formal  procedure  parameters, and no assumptions can be made about the length
-or alignment of the strings.  Any such assumptions would indicate an incorrect
-implementation.  They  might work for Dhrystone, where the strings are in fact
-word-aligned  with  typical  compilers,  but  other  programs  would   deliver
-incorrect results.
-
-So, for an apple-to-apple  comparison  between  processors,  and  not  between
-several  possible  (legal  or  illegal)  degrees of compiler optimization, one
-should check that the systems are comparable with  respect  to  the  following
-three points:
-
-  (1) String functions in assembly language vs. in C
-
-      Frequently used functions such as the string functions can and should be
-      written  in  assembly language, and all serious C language systems known
-      to me do this. (I list this point  for  completeness  only.)  Note  that
-      processors  with an instruction that checks a word for a null byte (such
-      as AMD's  29000  and  Intel's  80960)  have  an  advantage  here.  (This
-      advantage  decreases  relatively if optimization (3) is applied.) Due to
-      the length of the strings involved in Dhrystone, this advantage  may  be
-      considered  too  high  in  perspective, but it is certainly legal to use
-      such instructions - after all,  these  situations  are  what  they  were
-      invented for.
-
-  (2) String function code inline vs. as library functions.
-
-      ANSI  C  has  created  a  new  situation,  compared   with   the   older
-      Kernighan/Ritchie  C.  In  the  original C, the definition of the string
-      function was not part of the  language.  Now  it  is,  and  inlining  is
-      explicitly  allowed.  I  probably  should have stated more clearly in my
-      SIGPLAN  Notices  paper  that  the  rule  "No  procedure  inlining   for
-      Dhrystone"  referred  to  the  user level procedures only and not to the
-      library routines.
-
-  (3) Fixed-length and alignment assumptions for the strings
-
-      Compilers should be allowed to optimize in these cases if (and only  if)
-      it  is safe to do so. For Dhrystone, this is the "strcpy" statement, but
-      not the  "strcmp"  statement  (unless,  of  course,  the  "strcmp"  code
-      explicitly   checks   the  alignment  at  execution  time  and  branches
-      accordingly).  A "Dhrystone switch" for the  compiler  that  causes  the
-      generation  of  code  that  may  not work under certain circumstances is
-      certainly inappropriate for comparisons. It has been reported in  Usenet
-      that some C compilers provide such a compiler option; since I don't have
-      access to all C compilers involved, I cannot verify this.
-
-      If the fixed-length and word-alignment assumption can be  used,  a  wide
-      bus  that permits fast multi-word load instructions certainly does help;
-      however, this fact by itself should not make a really big difference.
-
-A check of  these  points  -  something  that  is  necessary  for  a  thorough
-evaluation  and  comparison  of  the  Dhrystone  performance claims - requires
-object code listings as well as listings for  the  string  functions  (strcpy,
-strcmp) that are possibly called by the program.
-
-I don't pretend that Dhrystone is  a  perfect  tool  to  measure  the  integer
-performance  of microprocessors. The more it is used and discussed, the more I
-myself learn about aspects that I hadn't noticed yet when I wrote the program.
-And  of  course,  the  very success of a benchmark program is a danger in that
-people may tune their compilers and/or hardware to it, and  with  this  action
-make it less useful.
-
-Whetstone and Linpack have their critical points also:  The  Whetstone  rating
-depends  heavily on the speed of the mathematical functions (sine, sqrt, ...),
-and Linpack is sensitive to data alignment for some cache configurations.
-
-Introduction of a standard set of public domain benchmark software  (something
-the  SPEC  effort attempts) is certainly a worthwhile thing.  In the meantime,
-people will continue to use whatever is available and widely distributed,  and
-Dhrystone  ratings  are probably still better than MIPS ratings if these are -
-as often in industry - based on  no  reproducible  derivation.   However,  any
-serious  performance  evaluation  requires  more than just a comparison of raw
-numbers; one has to make sure  that  the  numbers  have  been  obtained  in  a
-comparable way.
-
//GO.SYSIN DD VARIATIONS
echo dhry.h 1>&2
sed >dhry.h <<'//GO.SYSIN DD dhry.h' 's/^-//'
-/*
- ****************************************************************************
- *
- *                   "DHRYSTONE" Benchmark Program
- *                   -----------------------------
- *                                                                            
- *  Version:    C, Version 2.1
- *                                                                            
- *  File:       dhry.h (part 1 of 3)
- *
- *  Date:       May 25, 1988
- *
- *  Author:     Reinhold P. Weicker
- *                      Siemens AG, AUT E 51
- *                      Postfach 3220
- *                      8520 Erlangen
- *                      Germany (West)
- *                              Phone:  [+49]-9131-7-20330
- *                                      (8-17 Central European Time)
- *                              Usenet: ..!mcsun!unido!estevax!weicker
- *
- *              Original Version (in Ada) published in
- *              "Communications of the ACM" vol. 27., no. 10 (Oct. 1984),
- *              pp. 1013 - 1030, together with the statistics
- *              on which the distribution of statements etc. is based.
- *
- *              In this C version, the following C library functions are used:
- *              - strcpy, strcmp (inside the measurement loop)
- *              - printf, scanf (outside the measurement loop)
- *              In addition, Berkeley UNIX system calls "times ()" or "time ()"
- *              are used for execution time measurement. For measurements
- *              on other systems, these calls have to be changed.
- *
- *  Collection of Results:
- *              Reinhold Weicker (address see above) and
- *              
- *              Rick Richardson
- *              PC Research. Inc.
- *              94 Apple Orchard Drive
- *              Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
- *                      Phone:  (201) 389-8963 (9-17 EST)               
- *                      Usenet: ...!uunet!pcrat!rick
- *
- *      Please send results to Rick Richardson and/or Reinhold Weicker.
- *      Complete information should be given on hardware and software used.
- *      Hardware information includes: Machine type, CPU, type and size
- *      of caches; for microprocessors: clock frequency, memory speed
- *      (number of wait states).
- *      Software information includes: Compiler (and runtime library)
- *      manufacturer and version, compilation switches, OS version.
- *      The Operating System version may give an indication about the
- *      compiler; Dhrystone itself performs no OS calls in the measurement loop.
- *
- *      The complete output generated by the program should be mailed
- *      such that at least some checks for correctness can be made.
- *
- ***************************************************************************
- *
- *  History:    This version C/2.1 has been made for two reasons:
- *
- *              1) There is an obvious need for a common C version of
- *              Dhrystone, since C is at present the most popular system
- *              programming language for the class of processors
- *              (microcomputers, minicomputers) where Dhrystone is used most.
- *              There should be, as far as possible, only one C version of
- *              Dhrystone such that results can be compared without
- *              restrictions. In the past, the C versions distributed
- *              by Rick Richardson (Version 1.1) and by Reinhold Weicker
- *              had small (though not significant) differences.
- *
- *              2) As far as it is possible without changes to the Dhrystone
- *              statistics, optimizing compilers should be prevented from
- *              removing significant statements.
- *
- *              This C version has been developed in cooperation with
- *              Rick Richardson (Tinton Falls, NJ), it incorporates many
- *              ideas from the "Version 1.1" distributed previously by
- *              him over the UNIX network Usenet.
- *              I also thank Chaim Benedelac (National Semiconductor),
- *              David Ditzel (SUN), Earl Killian and John Mashey (MIPS),
- *              Alan Smith and Rafael Saavedra-Barrera (UC at Berkeley)
- *              for their help with comments on earlier versions of the
- *              benchmark.
- *
- *  Changes:    In the initialization part, this version follows mostly
- *              Rick Richardson's version distributed via Usenet, not the
- *              version distributed earlier via floppy disk by Reinhold Weicker.
- *              As a concession to older compilers, names have been made
- *              unique within the first 8 characters.
- *              Inside the measurement loop, this version follows the
- *              version previously distributed by Reinhold Weicker.
- *
- *              At several places in the benchmark, code has been added,
- *              but within the measurement loop only in branches that 
- *              are not executed. The intention is that optimizing compilers
- *              should be prevented from moving code out of the measurement
- *              loop, or from removing code altogether. Since the statements
- *              that are executed within the measurement loop have NOT been
- *              changed, the numbers defining the "Dhrystone distribution"
- *              (distribution of statements, operand types and locality)
- *              still hold. Except for sophisticated optimizing compilers,
- *              execution times for this version should be the same as
- *              for previous versions.
- *              
- *              Since it has proven difficult to subtract the time for the
- *              measurement loop overhead in a correct way, the loop check
- *              has been made a part of the benchmark. This does have
- *              an impact - though a very minor one - on the distribution
- *              statistics which have been updated for this version.
- *
- *              All changes within the measurement loop are described
- *              and discussed in the companion paper "Rationale for
- *              Dhrystone version 2".
- *
- *              Because of the self-imposed limitation that the order and
- *              distribution of the executed statements should not be
- *              changed, there are still cases where optimizing compilers
- *              may not generate code for some statements. To a certain
- *              degree, this is unavoidable for small synthetic benchmarks.
- *              Users of the benchmark are advised to check code listings
- *              whether code is generated for all statements of Dhrystone.
- *
- *              Version 2.1 is identical to version 2.0 distributed via
- *              the UNIX network Usenet in March 1988 except that it corrects
- *              some minor deficiencies that were found by users of version 2.0.
- *              The only change within the measurement loop is that a
- *              non-executed "else" part was added to the "if" statement in
- *              Func_3, and a non-executed "else" part removed from Proc_3.
- *
- ***************************************************************************
- *
- * Defines:     The following "Defines" are possible:
- *              -DREG=register          (default: Not defined)
- *                      As an approximation to what an average C programmer
- *                      might do, the "register" storage class is applied
- *                      (if enabled by -DREG=register)
- *                      - for local variables, if they are used (dynamically)
- *                        five or more times
- *                      - for parameters if they are used (dynamically)
- *                        six or more times
- *                      Note that an optimal "register" strategy is
- *                      compiler-dependent, and that "register" declarations
- *                      do not necessarily lead to faster execution.
- *              -DNOSTRUCTASSIGN        (default: Not defined)
- *                      Define if the C compiler does not support
- *                      assignment of structures.
- *              -DNOENUMS               (default: Not defined)
- *                      Define if the C compiler does not support
- *                      enumeration types.
- *              -DTIMES                 (default)
- *              -DTIME
- *                      The "times" function of UNIX (returning process times)
- *                      or the "time" function (returning wallclock time)
- *                      is used for measurement. 
- *                      For single user machines, "time ()" is adequate. For
- *                      multi-user machines where you cannot get single-user
- *                      access, use the "times ()" function. If you have
- *                      neither, use a stopwatch in the dead of night.
- *                      "printf"s are provided marking the points "Start Timer"
- *                      and "Stop Timer". DO NOT use the UNIX "time(1)"
- *                      command, as this will measure the total time to
- *                      run this program, which will (erroneously) include
- *                      the time to allocate storage (malloc) and to perform
- *                      the initialization.
- *              -DHZ=nnn
- *                      In Berkeley UNIX, the function "times" returns process
- *                      time in 1/HZ seconds, with HZ = 60 for most systems.
- *                      CHECK YOUR SYSTEM DESCRIPTION BEFORE YOU JUST APPLY
- *                      A VALUE.
- *
- ***************************************************************************
- *
- *  Compilation model and measurement (IMPORTANT):
- *
- *  This C version of Dhrystone consists of three files:
- *  - dhry.h (this file, containing global definitions and comments)
- *  - dhry_1.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_1)
- *  - dhry_2.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_2)
- *
- *  The following "ground rules" apply for measurements:
- *  - Separate compilation
- *  - No procedure merging
- *  - Otherwise, compiler optimizations are allowed but should be indicated
- *  - Default results are those without register declarations
- *  See the companion paper "Rationale for Dhrystone Version 2" for a more
- *  detailed discussion of these ground rules.
- *
- *  For 16-Bit processors (e.g. 80186, 80286), times for all compilation
- *  models ("small", "medium", "large" etc.) should be given if possible,
- *  together with a definition of these models for the compiler system used.
- *
- **************************************************************************
- *
- *  Dhrystone (C version) statistics:
- *
- *  [Comment from the first distribution, updated for version 2.
- *   Note that because of language differences, the numbers are slightly
- *   different from the Ada version.]
- *
- *  The following program contains statements of a high level programming
- *  language (here: C) in a distribution considered representative:           
- *
- *    assignments                  52 (51.0 %)
- *    control statements           33 (32.4 %)
- *    procedure, function calls    17 (16.7 %)
- *
- *  103 statements are dynamically executed. The program is balanced with
- *  respect to the three aspects:                                             
- *
- *    - statement type
- *    - operand type
- *    - operand locality
- *         operand global, local, parameter, or constant.                     
- *
- *  The combination of these three aspects is balanced only approximately.    
- *
- *  1. Statement Type:                                                        
- *  -----------------             number
- *
- *     V1 = V2                     9
- *       (incl. V1 = F(..)
- *     V = Constant               12
- *     Assignment,                 7
- *       with array element
- *     Assignment,                 6
- *       with record component
- *                                --
- *                                34       34
- *
- *     X = Y +|-|"&&"|"|" Z        5
- *     X = Y +|-|"==" Constant     6
- *     X = X +|- 1                 3
- *     X = Y *|/ Z                 2
- *     X = Expression,             1
- *           two operators
- *     X = Expression,             1
- *           three operators
- *                                --
- *                                18       18
- *
- *     if ....                    14
- *       with "else"      7
- *       without "else"   7
- *           executed        3
- *           not executed    4
- *     for ...                     7  |  counted every time
- *     while ...                   4  |  the loop condition
- *     do ... while                1  |  is evaluated
- *     switch ...                  1
- *     break                       1
- *     declaration with            1
- *       initialization
- *                                --
- *                                34       34
- *
- *     P (...)  procedure call    11
- *       user procedure      10
- *       library procedure    1
- *     X = F (...)
- *             function  call      6
- *       user function        5                                         
- *       library function     1                                               
- *                                --                                          
- *                                17       17
- *                                        ---
- *                                        103
- *
- *    The average number of parameters in procedure or function calls
- *    is 1.82 (not counting the function values as implicit parameters).
- *
- *
- *  2. Operators
- *  ------------
- *                          number    approximate
- *                                    percentage
- *
- *    Arithmetic             32          50.8                                 
- *
- *       +                     21          33.3                              
- *       -                      7          11.1                              
- *       *                      3           4.8
- *       / (int div)            1           1.6
- *
- *    Comparison             27           42.8
- *
- *       ==                     9           14.3
- *       /=                     4            6.3
- *       >                      1            1.6
- *       <                      3            4.8
- *       >=                     1            1.6
- *       <=                     9           14.3
- *
- *    Logic                   4            6.3
- *
- *       && (AND-THEN)          1            1.6
- *       |  (OR)                1            1.6
- *       !  (NOT)               2            3.2
- * 
- *                           --          -----
- *                           63          100.1
- *
- *
- *  3. Operand Type (counted once per operand reference):
- *  ---------------
- *                          number    approximate
- *                                    percentage
- *
- *     Integer               175        72.3 %
- *     Character              45        18.6 %
- *     Pointer                12         5.0 %
- *     String30                6         2.5 %
- *     Array                   2         0.8 %
- *     Record                  2         0.8 %
- *                           ---       -------
- *                           242       100.0 %
- *
- *  When there is an access path leading to the final operand (e.g. a record
- *  component), only the final data type on the access path is counted.       
- *
- *
- *  4. Operand Locality:                                                      
- *  -------------------
- *                                number    approximate
- *                                          percentage
- *
- *     local variable              114        47.1 %
- *     global variable              22         9.1 %
- *     parameter                    45        18.6 %
- *        value                        23         9.5 %
- *        reference                    22         9.1 %
- *     function result               6         2.5 %
- *     constant                     55        22.7 %
- *                                 ---       -------
- *                                 242       100.0 %
- *
- *
- *  The program does not compute anything meaningful, but it is syntactically
- *  and semantically correct. All variables have a value assigned to them
- *  before they are used as a source operand.
- *
- *  There has been no explicit effort to account for the effects of a
- *  cache, or to balance the use of long or short displacements for code or
- *  data.
- *
- ***************************************************************************
- */
-
-/* Compiler and system dependent definitions: */
-
-#ifndef TIME
-#define TIMES
-#endif
-                /* Use times(2) time function unless    */
-                /* explicitly defined otherwise         */
-
-#ifdef TIMES
-#include <sys/types.h>
-#include <sys/times.h>
-                /* for "times" */
-#endif
-
-#define Mic_secs_Per_Second     1000000.0
-                /* Berkeley UNIX C returns process times in seconds/HZ */
-
-#ifdef  NOSTRUCTASSIGN
-#define structassign(d, s)      memcpy(&(d), &(s), sizeof(d))
-#else
-#define structassign(d, s)      d = s
-#endif
-
-#ifdef  NOENUM
-#define Ident_1 0
-#define Ident_2 1
-#define Ident_3 2
-#define Ident_4 3
-#define Ident_5 4
-  typedef int   Enumeration;
-#else
-  typedef       enum    {Ident_1, Ident_2, Ident_3, Ident_4, Ident_5}
-                Enumeration;
-#endif
-        /* for boolean and enumeration types in Ada, Pascal */
-
-/* General definitions: */
-
-#include <stdio.h>
-                /* for strcpy, strcmp */
-
-#define Null 0 
-                /* Value of a Null pointer */
-#define true  1
-#define false 0
-
-typedef int     One_Thirty;
-typedef int     One_Fifty;
-typedef char    Capital_Letter;
-typedef int     Boolean;
-typedef char    Str_30 [31];
-typedef int     Arr_1_Dim [50];
-typedef int     Arr_2_Dim [50] [50];
-
-typedef struct record 
-    {
-    struct record *Ptr_Comp;
-    Enumeration    Discr;
-    union {
-          struct {
-                  Enumeration Enum_Comp;
-                  int         Int_Comp;
-                  char        Str_Comp [31];
-                  } var_1;
-          struct {
-                  Enumeration E_Comp_2;
-                  char        Str_2_Comp [31];
-                  } var_2;
-          struct {
-                  char        Ch_1_Comp;
-                  char        Ch_2_Comp;
-                  } var_3;
-          } variant;
-      } Rec_Type, *Rec_Pointer;
-
-
//GO.SYSIN DD dhry.h
echo dhry_1.c 1>&2
sed >dhry_1.c <<'//GO.SYSIN DD dhry_1.c' 's/^-//'
-/*
- ****************************************************************************
- *
- *                   "DHRYSTONE" Benchmark Program
- *                   -----------------------------
- *                                                                            
- *  Version:    C, Version 2.1
- *                                                                            
- *  File:       dhry_1.c (part 2 of 3)
- *
- *  Date:       May 25, 1988
- *
- *  Author:     Reinhold P. Weicker
- *
- ****************************************************************************
- */
-
-#include "dhry.h"
-
-/* Global Variables: */
-
-Rec_Pointer     Ptr_Glob,
-                Next_Ptr_Glob;
-int             Int_Glob;
-Boolean         Bool_Glob;
-char            Ch_1_Glob,
-                Ch_2_Glob;
-int             Arr_1_Glob [50];
-int             Arr_2_Glob [50] [50];
-
-extern char     *malloc ();
-Enumeration     Func_1 ();
-  /* forward declaration necessary since Enumeration may not simply be int */
-
-#ifndef REG
-        Boolean Reg = false;
-#define REG
-        /* REG becomes defined as empty */
-        /* i.e. no register variables   */
-#else
-        Boolean Reg = true;
-#endif
-
-/* variables for time measurement: */
-
-#ifdef TIMES
-struct tms      time_info;
-extern  int     times ();
-                /* see library function "times" */
-#define Too_Small_Time 120
-                /* Measurements should last at least about 2 seconds */
-#endif
-#ifdef TIME
-extern long     time();
-                /* see library function "time"  */
-#define Too_Small_Time 2
-                /* Measurements should last at least 2 seconds */
-#endif
-
-long            Begin_Time,
-                End_Time,
-                User_Time;
-float           Microseconds,
-                Dhrystones_Per_Second;
-
-/* end of variables for time measurement */
-
-
-main ()
-/*****/
-
-  /* main program, corresponds to procedures        */
-  /* Main and Proc_0 in the Ada version             */
-{
-        One_Fifty       Int_1_Loc;
-  REG   One_Fifty       Int_2_Loc;
-        One_Fifty       Int_3_Loc;
-  REG   char            Ch_Index;
-        Enumeration     Enum_Loc;
-        Str_30          Str_1_Loc;
-        Str_30          Str_2_Loc;
-  REG   int             Run_Index;
-  REG   int             Number_Of_Runs;
-
-  /* Initializations */
-
-  Next_Ptr_Glob = (Rec_Pointer) malloc (sizeof (Rec_Type));
-  Ptr_Glob = (Rec_Pointer) malloc (sizeof (Rec_Type));
-
-  Ptr_Glob->Ptr_Comp                    = Next_Ptr_Glob;
-  Ptr_Glob->Discr                       = Ident_1;
-  Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Enum_Comp     = Ident_3;
-  Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Int_Comp      = 40;
-  strcpy (Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Str_Comp, 
-          "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, SOME STRING");
-  strcpy (Str_1_Loc, "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 1'ST STRING");
-
-  Arr_2_Glob [8][7] = 10;
-        /* Was missing in published program. Without this statement,    */
-        /* Arr_2_Glob [8][7] would have an undefined value.             */
-        /* Warning: With 16-Bit processors and Number_Of_Runs > 32000,  */
-        /* overflow may occur for this array element.                   */
-
-  printf ("\n");
-  printf ("Dhrystone Benchmark, Version 2.1 (Language: C)\n");
-  printf ("\n");
-  if (Reg)
-  {
-    printf ("Program compiled with 'register' attribute\n");
-    printf ("\n");
-  }
-  else
-  {
-    printf ("Program compiled without 'register' attribute\n");
-    printf ("\n");
-  }
-  printf ("Please give the number of runs through the benchmark: ");
-  {
-    int n;
-    scanf ("%d", &n);
-    Number_Of_Runs = n;
-  }
-  printf ("\n");
-
-  printf ("Execution starts, %d runs through Dhrystone\n", Number_Of_Runs);
-
-  /***************/
-  /* Start timer */
-  /***************/
- 
-#ifdef TIMES
-  times (&time_info);
-  Begin_Time = (long) time_info.tms_utime;
-#endif
-#ifdef TIME
-  Begin_Time = time ( (long *) 0);
-#endif
-
-  for (Run_Index = 1; Run_Index <= Number_Of_Runs; ++Run_Index)
-  {
-
-    Proc_5();
-    Proc_4();
-      /* Ch_1_Glob == 'A', Ch_2_Glob == 'B', Bool_Glob == true */
-    Int_1_Loc = 2;
-    Int_2_Loc = 3;
-    strcpy (Str_2_Loc, "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 2'ND STRING");
-    Enum_Loc = Ident_2;
-    Bool_Glob = ! Func_2 (Str_1_Loc, Str_2_Loc);
-      /* Bool_Glob == 1 */
-    while (Int_1_Loc < Int_2_Loc)  /* loop body executed once */
-    {
-      Int_3_Loc = 5 * Int_1_Loc - Int_2_Loc;
-        /* Int_3_Loc == 7 */
-      Proc_7 (Int_1_Loc, Int_2_Loc, &Int_3_Loc);
-        /* Int_3_Loc == 7 */
-      Int_1_Loc += 1;
-    } /* while */
-      /* Int_1_Loc == 3, Int_2_Loc == 3, Int_3_Loc == 7 */
-    Proc_8 (Arr_1_Glob, Arr_2_Glob, Int_1_Loc, Int_3_Loc);
-      /* Int_Glob == 5 */
-    Proc_1 (Ptr_Glob);
-    for (Ch_Index = 'A'; Ch_Index <= Ch_2_Glob; ++Ch_Index)
-                             /* loop body executed twice */
-    {
-      if (Enum_Loc == Func_1 (Ch_Index, 'C'))
-          /* then, not executed */
-        {
-        Proc_6 (Ident_1, &Enum_Loc);
-        strcpy (Str_2_Loc, "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 3'RD STRING");
-        Int_2_Loc = Run_Index;
-        Int_Glob = Run_Index;
-        }
-    }
-      /* Int_1_Loc == 3, Int_2_Loc == 3, Int_3_Loc == 7 */
-    Int_2_Loc = Int_2_Loc * Int_1_Loc;
-    Int_1_Loc = Int_2_Loc / Int_3_Loc;
-    Int_2_Loc = 7 * (Int_2_Loc - Int_3_Loc) - Int_1_Loc;
-      /* Int_1_Loc == 1, Int_2_Loc == 13, Int_3_Loc == 7 */
-    Proc_2 (&Int_1_Loc);
-      /* Int_1_Loc == 5 */
-
-  } /* loop "for Run_Index" */
-
-  /**************/
-  /* Stop timer */
-  /**************/
-  
-#ifdef TIMES
-  times (&time_info);
-  End_Time = (long) time_info.tms_utime;
-#endif
-#ifdef TIME
-  End_Time = time ( (long *) 0);
-#endif
-
-  printf ("Execution ends\n");
-  printf ("\n");
-  printf ("Final values of the variables used in the benchmark:\n");
-  printf ("\n");
-  printf ("Int_Glob:            %d\n", Int_Glob);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 5);
-  printf ("Bool_Glob:           %d\n", Bool_Glob);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 1);
-  printf ("Ch_1_Glob:           %c\n", Ch_1_Glob);
-  printf ("        should be:   %c\n", 'A');
-  printf ("Ch_2_Glob:           %c\n", Ch_2_Glob);
-  printf ("        should be:   %c\n", 'B');
-  printf ("Arr_1_Glob[8]:       %d\n", Arr_1_Glob[8]);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 7);
-  printf ("Arr_2_Glob[8][7]:    %d\n", Arr_2_Glob[8][7]);
-  printf ("        should be:   Number_Of_Runs + 10\n");
-  printf ("Ptr_Glob->\n");
-  printf ("  Ptr_Comp:          %d\n", (int) Ptr_Glob->Ptr_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   (implementation-dependent)\n");
-  printf ("  Discr:             %d\n", Ptr_Glob->Discr);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 0);
-  printf ("  Enum_Comp:         %d\n", Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Enum_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 2);
-  printf ("  Int_Comp:          %d\n", Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Int_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 17);
-  printf ("  Str_Comp:          %s\n", Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Str_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, SOME STRING\n");
-  printf ("Next_Ptr_Glob->\n");
-  printf ("  Ptr_Comp:          %d\n", (int) Next_Ptr_Glob->Ptr_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   (implementation-dependent), same as above\n");
-  printf ("  Discr:             %d\n", Next_Ptr_Glob->Discr);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 0);
-  printf ("  Enum_Comp:         %d\n", Next_Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Enum_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 1);
-  printf ("  Int_Comp:          %d\n", Next_Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Int_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 18);
-  printf ("  Str_Comp:          %s\n",
-                                Next_Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Str_Comp);
-  printf ("        should be:   DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, SOME STRING\n");
-  printf ("Int_1_Loc:           %d\n", Int_1_Loc);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 5);
-  printf ("Int_2_Loc:           %d\n", Int_2_Loc);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 13);
-  printf ("Int_3_Loc:           %d\n", Int_3_Loc);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 7);
-  printf ("Enum_Loc:            %d\n", Enum_Loc);
-  printf ("        should be:   %d\n", 1);
-  printf ("Str_1_Loc:           %s\n", Str_1_Loc);
-  printf ("        should be:   DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 1'ST STRING\n");
-  printf ("Str_2_Loc:           %s\n", Str_2_Loc);
-  printf ("        should be:   DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 2'ND STRING\n");
-  printf ("\n");
-
-  User_Time = End_Time - Begin_Time;
-
-  if (User_Time < Too_Small_Time)
-  {
-    printf ("Measured time too small to obtain meaningful results\n");
-    printf ("Please increase number of runs\n");
-    printf ("\n");
-  }
-  else
-  {
-#ifdef TIME
-    Microseconds = (float) User_Time * Mic_secs_Per_Second 
-                        / (float) Number_Of_Runs;
-    Dhrystones_Per_Second = (float) Number_Of_Runs / (float) User_Time;
-#else
-    Microseconds = (float) User_Time * Mic_secs_Per_Second 
-                        / ((float) HZ * ((float) Number_Of_Runs));
-    Dhrystones_Per_Second = ((float) HZ * (float) Number_Of_Runs)
-                        / (float) User_Time;
-#endif
-    printf ("Microseconds for one run through Dhrystone: ");
-    printf ("%6.1f \n", Microseconds);
-    printf ("Dhrystones per Second:                      ");
-    printf ("%6.1f \n", Dhrystones_Per_Second);
-    printf ("\n");
-  }
-  
-}
-
-
-Proc_1 (Ptr_Val_Par)
-/******************/
-
-REG Rec_Pointer Ptr_Val_Par;
-    /* executed once */
-{
-  REG Rec_Pointer Next_Record = Ptr_Val_Par->Ptr_Comp;  
-                                        /* == Ptr_Glob_Next */
-  /* Local variable, initialized with Ptr_Val_Par->Ptr_Comp,    */
-  /* corresponds to "rename" in Ada, "with" in Pascal           */
-  
-  structassign (*Ptr_Val_Par->Ptr_Comp, *Ptr_Glob); 
-  Ptr_Val_Par->variant.var_1.Int_Comp = 5;
-  Next_Record->variant.var_1.Int_Comp 
-        = Ptr_Val_Par->variant.var_1.Int_Comp;
-  Next_Record->Ptr_Comp = Ptr_Val_Par->Ptr_Comp;
-  Proc_3 (&Next_Record->Ptr_Comp);
-    /* Ptr_Val_Par->Ptr_Comp->Ptr_Comp 
-                        == Ptr_Glob->Ptr_Comp */
-  if (Next_Record->Discr == Ident_1)
-    /* then, executed */
-  {
-    Next_Record->variant.var_1.Int_Comp = 6;
-    Proc_6 (Ptr_Val_Par->variant.var_1.Enum_Comp, 
-           &Next_Record->variant.var_1.Enum_Comp);
-    Next_Record->Ptr_Comp = Ptr_Glob->Ptr_Comp;
-    Proc_7 (Next_Record->variant.var_1.Int_Comp, 10, 
-           &Next_Record->variant.var_1.Int_Comp);
-  }
-  else /* not executed */
-    structassign (*Ptr_Val_Par, *Ptr_Val_Par->Ptr_Comp);
-} /* Proc_1 */
-
-
-Proc_2 (Int_Par_Ref)
-/******************/
-    /* executed once */
-    /* *Int_Par_Ref == 1, becomes 4 */
-
-One_Fifty   *Int_Par_Ref;
-{
-  One_Fifty  Int_Loc;  
-  Enumeration   Enum_Loc;
-
-  Int_Loc = *Int_Par_Ref + 10;
-  do /* executed once */
-    if (Ch_1_Glob == 'A')
-      /* then, executed */
-    {
-      Int_Loc -= 1;
-      *Int_Par_Ref = Int_Loc - Int_Glob;
-      Enum_Loc = Ident_1;
-    } /* if */
-  while (Enum_Loc != Ident_1); /* true */
-} /* Proc_2 */
-
-
-Proc_3 (Ptr_Ref_Par)
-/******************/
-    /* executed once */
-    /* Ptr_Ref_Par becomes Ptr_Glob */
-
-Rec_Pointer *Ptr_Ref_Par;
-
-{
-  if (Ptr_Glob != Null)
-    /* then, executed */
-    *Ptr_Ref_Par = Ptr_Glob->Ptr_Comp;
-  Proc_7 (10, Int_Glob, &Ptr_Glob->variant.var_1.Int_Comp);
-} /* Proc_3 */
-
-
-Proc_4 () /* without parameters */
-/*******/
-    /* executed once */
-{
-  Boolean Bool_Loc;
-
-  Bool_Loc = Ch_1_Glob == 'A';
-  Bool_Glob = Bool_Loc | Bool_Glob;
-  Ch_2_Glob = 'B';
-} /* Proc_4 */
-
-
-Proc_5 () /* without parameters */
-/*******/
-    /* executed once */
-{
-  Ch_1_Glob = 'A';
-  Bool_Glob = false;
-} /* Proc_5 */
-
-
-        /* Procedure for the assignment of structures,          */
-        /* if the C compiler doesn't support this feature       */
-#ifdef  NOSTRUCTASSIGN
-memcpy (d, s, l)
-register char   *d;
-register char   *s;
-register int    l;
-{
-        while (l--) *d++ = *s++;
-}
-#endif
-
-
//GO.SYSIN DD dhry_1.c
echo dhry_2.c 1>&2
sed >dhry_2.c <<'//GO.SYSIN DD dhry_2.c' 's/^-//'
-/*
- ****************************************************************************
- *
- *                   "DHRYSTONE" Benchmark Program
- *                   -----------------------------
- *                                                                            
- *  Version:    C, Version 2.1
- *                                                                            
- *  File:       dhry_2.c (part 3 of 3)
- *
- *  Date:       May 25, 1988
- *
- *  Author:     Reinhold P. Weicker
- *
- ****************************************************************************
- */
-
-#include "dhry.h"
-
-#ifndef REG
-#define REG
-        /* REG becomes defined as empty */
-        /* i.e. no register variables   */
-#endif
-
-extern  int     Int_Glob;
-extern  char    Ch_1_Glob;
-
-
-Proc_6 (Enum_Val_Par, Enum_Ref_Par)
-/*********************************/
-    /* executed once */
-    /* Enum_Val_Par == Ident_3, Enum_Ref_Par becomes Ident_2 */
-
-Enumeration  Enum_Val_Par;
-Enumeration *Enum_Ref_Par;
-{
-  *Enum_Ref_Par = Enum_Val_Par;
-  if (! Func_3 (Enum_Val_Par))
-    /* then, not executed */
-    *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_4;
-  switch (Enum_Val_Par)
-  {
-    case Ident_1: 
-      *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_1;
-      break;
-    case Ident_2: 
-      if (Int_Glob > 100)
-        /* then */
-      *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_1;
-      else *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_4;
-      break;
-    case Ident_3: /* executed */
-      *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_2;
-      break;
-    case Ident_4: break;
-    case Ident_5: 
-      *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_3;
-      break;
-  } /* switch */
-} /* Proc_6 */
-
-
-Proc_7 (Int_1_Par_Val, Int_2_Par_Val, Int_Par_Ref)
-/**********************************************/
-    /* executed three times                                      */ 
-    /* first call:      Int_1_Par_Val == 2, Int_2_Par_Val == 3,  */
-    /*                  Int_Par_Ref becomes 7                    */
-    /* second call:     Int_1_Par_Val == 10, Int_2_Par_Val == 5, */
-    /*                  Int_Par_Ref becomes 17                   */
-    /* third call:      Int_1_Par_Val == 6, Int_2_Par_Val == 10, */
-    /*                  Int_Par_Ref becomes 18                   */
-One_Fifty       Int_1_Par_Val;
-One_Fifty       Int_2_Par_Val;
-One_Fifty      *Int_Par_Ref;
-{
-  One_Fifty Int_Loc;
-
-  Int_Loc = Int_1_Par_Val + 2;
-  *Int_Par_Ref = Int_2_Par_Val + Int_Loc;
-} /* Proc_7 */
-
-
-Proc_8 (Arr_1_Par_Ref, Arr_2_Par_Ref, Int_1_Par_Val, Int_2_Par_Val)
-/*********************************************************************/
-    /* executed once      */
-    /* Int_Par_Val_1 == 3 */
-    /* Int_Par_Val_2 == 7 */
-Arr_1_Dim       Arr_1_Par_Ref;
-Arr_2_Dim       Arr_2_Par_Ref;
-int             Int_1_Par_Val;
-int             Int_2_Par_Val;
-{
-  REG One_Fifty Int_Index;
-  REG One_Fifty Int_Loc;
-
-  Int_Loc = Int_1_Par_Val + 5;
-  Arr_1_Par_Ref [Int_Loc] = Int_2_Par_Val;
-  Arr_1_Par_Ref [Int_Loc+1] = Arr_1_Par_Ref [Int_Loc];
-  Arr_1_Par_Ref [Int_Loc+30] = Int_Loc;
-  for (Int_Index = Int_Loc; Int_Index <= Int_Loc+1; ++Int_Index)
-    Arr_2_Par_Ref [Int_Loc] [Int_Index] = Int_Loc;
-  Arr_2_Par_Ref [Int_Loc] [Int_Loc-1] += 1;
-  Arr_2_Par_Ref [Int_Loc+20] [Int_Loc] = Arr_1_Par_Ref [Int_Loc];
-  Int_Glob = 5;
-} /* Proc_8 */
-
-
-Enumeration Func_1 (Ch_1_Par_Val, Ch_2_Par_Val)
-/*************************************************/
-    /* executed three times                                         */
-    /* first call:      Ch_1_Par_Val == 'H', Ch_2_Par_Val == 'R'    */
-    /* second call:     Ch_1_Par_Val == 'A', Ch_2_Par_Val == 'C'    */
-    /* third call:      Ch_1_Par_Val == 'B', Ch_2_Par_Val == 'C'    */
-
-Capital_Letter   Ch_1_Par_Val;
-Capital_Letter   Ch_2_Par_Val;
-{
-  Capital_Letter        Ch_1_Loc;
-  Capital_Letter        Ch_2_Loc;
-
-  Ch_1_Loc = Ch_1_Par_Val;
-  Ch_2_Loc = Ch_1_Loc;
-  if (Ch_2_Loc != Ch_2_Par_Val)
-    /* then, executed */
-    return (Ident_1);
-  else  /* not executed */
-  {
-    Ch_1_Glob = Ch_1_Loc;
-    return (Ident_2);
-   }
-} /* Func_1 */
-
-
-Boolean Func_2 (Str_1_Par_Ref, Str_2_Par_Ref)
-/*************************************************/
-    /* executed once */
-    /* Str_1_Par_Ref == "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 1'ST STRING" */
-    /* Str_2_Par_Ref == "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 2'ND STRING" */
-
-Str_30  Str_1_Par_Ref;
-Str_30  Str_2_Par_Ref;
-{
-  REG One_Thirty        Int_Loc;
-      Capital_Letter    Ch_Loc;
-
-  Int_Loc = 2;
-  while (Int_Loc <= 2) /* loop body executed once */
-    if (Func_1 (Str_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc],
-                Str_2_Par_Ref[Int_Loc+1]) == Ident_1)
-      /* then, executed */
-    {
-      Ch_Loc = 'A';
-      Int_Loc += 1;
-    } /* if, while */
-  if (Ch_Loc >= 'W' && Ch_Loc < 'Z')
-    /* then, not executed */
-    Int_Loc = 7;
-  if (Ch_Loc == 'R')
-    /* then, not executed */
-    return (true);
-  else /* executed */
-  {
-    if (strcmp (Str_1_Par_Ref, Str_2_Par_Ref) > 0)
-      /* then, not executed */
-    {
-      Int_Loc += 7;
-      Int_Glob = Int_Loc;
-      return (true);
-    }
-    else /* executed */
-      return (false);
-  } /* if Ch_Loc */
-} /* Func_2 */
-
-
-Boolean Func_3 (Enum_Par_Val)
-/***************************/
-    /* executed once        */
-    /* Enum_Par_Val == Ident_3 */
-Enumeration Enum_Par_Val;
-{
-  Enumeration Enum_Loc;
-
-  Enum_Loc = Enum_Par_Val;
-  if (Enum_Loc == Ident_3)
-    /* then, executed */
-    return (true);
-  else /* not executed */
-    return (false);
-} /* Func_3 */
-
//GO.SYSIN DD dhry_2.c
echo dhry_c.dif 1>&2
sed >dhry_c.dif <<'//GO.SYSIN DD dhry_c.dif' 's/^-//'
-7c7
-<  *  Version:    C, Version 2.1
----
->  *  Version:    C, Version 2.0
-9c9
-<  *  File:       dhry.h (part 1 of 3)
----
->  *  File:       dhry_global.h (part 1 of 3)
-11c11
-<  *  Date:       May 25, 1988
----
->  *  Date:       March 3, 1988
-30c30
-<  *              In addition, Berkeley UNIX system calls "times ()" or "time ()"
----
->  *              In addition, UNIX system calls "times ()" or "time ()"
-44c44
-<  *      Please send results to Rick Richardson and/or Reinhold Weicker.
----
->  *      Please send results to Reinhold Weicker and/or Rick Richardson.
-59c59
-<  *  History:    This version C/2.1 has been made for two reasons:
----
->  *  History:    This version C/2.0 has been made for two reasons:
-123,129d122
-<  *              Version 2.1 is identical to version 2.0 distributed via
-<  *              the UNIX network Usenet in March 1988 except that it corrects
-<  *              some minor deficiencies that were found by users of version 2.0.
-<  *              The only change within the measurement loop is that a
-<  *              non-executed "else" part was added to the "if" statement in
-<  *              Func_3, and a non-executed "else" part removed from Proc_3.
-<  *
-165,167c158,160
-<  *              -DHZ=nnn
-<  *                      In Berkeley UNIX, the function "times" returns process
-<  *                      time in 1/HZ seconds, with HZ = 60 for most systems.
----
->  *              -DHZ=nnn                (default: 60)
->  *                      The function "times" returns process times in
->  *                      1/HZ seconds, with HZ = 60 for most systems.
-169c162
-<  *                      A VALUE.
----
->  *                      THE DEFAULT VALUE.
-176,178c169,171
-<  *  - dhry.h (this file, containing global definitions and comments)
-<  *  - dhry_1.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_1)
-<  *  - dhry_2.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_2)
----
->  *  - dhry_global.h (this file, containing global definitions and comments)
->  *  - dhry_pack_1.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_1)
->  *  - dhry_pack_2.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_2)
-350a344
-> #ifndef TIMES
-353,354c347,354
-<                 /* Use times(2) time function unless    */
-<                 /* explicitly defined otherwise         */
----
-> #endif
->                 /* Use "times" function for measurement */
->                 /* unless explicitly defined otherwise  */
-> #ifndef HZ
-> #define HZ      60
-> #endif
->                 /* Use HZ = 60 for "times" function     */
->                 /* unless explicitly defined otherwise  */
-363c363
-<                 /* Berkeley UNIX C returns process times in seconds/HZ */
----
->                 /* UNIX C returns process times in seconds/HZ */
-7c7
-<  *  Version:    C, Version 2.1
----
->  *  Version:    C, Version 2.0
-9c9
-<  *  File:       dhry_1.c (part 2 of 3)
----
->  *  File:       dhry_pack_1.c (part 2 of 3)
-11c11
-<  *  Date:       May 25, 1988
----
->  *  Date:       March 3, 1988
-18c18
-< #include "dhry.h"
----
-> #include "dhry_global.h"
-50,51d49
-< #define Too_Small_Time 120
-<                 /* Measurements should last at least about 2 seconds */
-55a54,55
-> #endif
-> 
-58d57
-< #endif
-73a73
-> 
-84a85
-> 
-99,100c100,102
-<         /* Was missing in published program. Without this statement,    */
-<         /* Arr_2_Glob [8][7] would have an undefined value.             */
----
->         /* Was missing in published program. Without this               */
->         /* initialization, Arr_2_Glob [8][7] would have an              */
->         /* undefined value.                                             */
-105c107
-<   printf ("Dhrystone Benchmark, Version 2.1 (Language: C)\n");
----
->   printf ("Dhrystone Benchmark, Version 2.0 (Language: C)\n");
-281c283
-< /******************/
----
-> /**********************/
-338c340
-< /******************/
----
-> /**********************/
-347a350,351
->   else /* not executed */
->     Int_Glob = 100;
-349a354
-> 
-7c7
-<  *  Version:    C, Version 2.1
----
->  *  Version:    C, Version 2.0
-9c9
-<  *  File:       dhry_2.c (part 3 of 3)
----
->  *  File:       dhry_pack_2.c (part 3 of 3)
-11c11
-<  *  Date:       May 25, 1988
----
->  *  Date:       March 3, 1988
-18c18
-< #include "dhry.h"
----
-> #include "dhry_global.h"
-189,190d188
-<   else /* not executed */
-<     return (false);
//GO.SYSIN DD dhry_c.dif
echo submit.frm 1>&2
sed >submit.frm <<'//GO.SYSIN DD submit.frm' 's/^-//'
-DHRYSTONE 2.1 BENCHMARK REPORTING FORM
-MANUF:
-MODEL:
-PROC:
-CLOCK:
-OS:
-OVERSION:
-COMPILER:
-CVERSION:
-OPTIONS:
-NOREG:
-REG:
-NOTES:
-DATE:
-SUBMITTER:
-CODESIZE:
-MAILTO: uunet!pcrat!dry2
//GO.SYSIN DD submit.frm
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud