From d655490417ee22da3267fe6592a0ec2023c3c0db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:22 +0200 Subject: bpf: allow to specify log level and reduce it for test_verifier For the test_verifier case, it's quite hard to parse log level 2 to figure out what's causing an issue when used to log level 1. We do want to use bpf_verify_program() in order to simulate some of the tests with strict alignment. So just add an argument to pass the level and put it to 1 for test_verifier. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 4 ++-- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c index 7e0405e..412a7c8 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ int bpf_load_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, size_t insns_cnt, int strict_alignment, const char *license, __u32 kern_version, - char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz) + char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, int log_level) { union bpf_attr attr; @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, attr.license = ptr_to_u64(license); attr.log_buf = ptr_to_u64(log_buf); attr.log_size = log_buf_sz; - attr.log_level = 2; + attr.log_level = log_level; log_buf[0] = 0; attr.kern_version = kern_version; attr.prog_flags = strict_alignment ? BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT : 0; diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h index 16de44a..418c86e 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int bpf_load_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, int bpf_verify_program(enum bpf_prog_type type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, size_t insns_cnt, int strict_alignment, const char *license, __u32 kern_version, - char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz); + char *log_buf, size_t log_buf_sz, int log_level); int bpf_map_update_elem(int fd, const void *key, const void *value, __u64 flags); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c index bccebd9..2979369 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int do_test_single(struct bpf_align_test *test) prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog); fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type ? : BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, prog, prog_len, 1, "GPL", 0, - bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog)); + bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 2); if (fd_prog < 0) { printf("Failed to load program.\n"); printf("%s", bpf_vlog); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 404aec5..f4d0a1d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -5633,7 +5633,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type ? : BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, prog, prog_len, test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT, - "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog)); + "GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1); expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ? test->result_unpriv : test->result; -- cgit v1.1 From a1502132866fd2d2705eef4041dd6d7d849f48a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:23 +0200 Subject: bpf: fix up test cases with mixed signed/unsigned bounds Fix the few existing test cases that used mixed signed/unsigned bounds and switch them only to one flavor. Reason why we need this is that proper boundaries cannot be derived from mixed tests. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index f4d0a1d..64b39d3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -4969,7 +4969,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val), 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), @@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), @@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 20, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), @@ -5050,7 +5050,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), - BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), -- cgit v1.1 From b712296a41ce0a114895fdff68fc22aada165b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward Cree Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:24 +0200 Subject: bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks These failed due to a bug in verifier bounds handling. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 64b39d3..48b7997 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -5510,6 +5510,58 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, positive bounds", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 4, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.1 From 8641250251bfcd93479c71783c6792ae3325d7e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:00:25 +0200 Subject: bpf: more tests for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks Add a couple of more test cases to BPF selftests that are related to mixed signed and unsigned checks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 418 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 48b7997..af7d173 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -5562,6 +5562,424 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 2", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_8, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 3", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 4), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_8, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 4", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 5", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 5), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 4), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 4), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 6", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, -512), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_6, 5), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_4, 1, 4), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_4, 1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_5, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_10, -512, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_skb_load_bytes), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R4 min value is negative, either use unsigned", + .errstr = "R4 min value is negative, either use unsigned", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 7", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1024 * 1024 * 1024), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 8", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1024 * 1024 * 1024 + 1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 9", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 10", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 10), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, -9223372036854775808ULL), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 11", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 12", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + /* Dead branch. */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 13", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 14", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 2), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_7, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_7, 0, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_7, 4, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 15", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_9, 42, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_1, 3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, -3), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -7), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 4 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, + { + "bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 16", + .insns = { + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -16), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, 1, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", + .errstr = "R0 min value is negative", + .result = REJECT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.1