From d99a36f4728fcbcc501b78447f625bdcce15b842 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takashi Iwai Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:20:24 +0100 Subject: ALSA: seq: Fix leak of pool buffer at concurrent writes When multiple concurrent writes happen on the ALSA sequencer device right after the open, it may try to allocate vmalloc buffer for each write and leak some of them. It's because the presence check and the assignment of the buffer is done outside the spinlock for the pool. The fix is to move the check and the assignment into the spinlock. (The current implementation is suboptimal, as there can be multiple unnecessary vmallocs because the allocation is done before the check in the spinlock. But the pool size is already checked beforehand, so this isn't a big problem; that is, the only possible path is the multiple writes before any pool assignment, and practically seen, the current coverage should be "good enough".) The issue was triggered by syzkaller fuzzer. BugLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+bSzazpXNvtAr=WXaL8hptqjHwqEyFA+VN2AWEx=aurkg@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'sound/core') diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c index 8010766..c850345 100644 --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_memory.c @@ -383,15 +383,20 @@ int snd_seq_pool_init(struct snd_seq_pool *pool) if (snd_BUG_ON(!pool)) return -EINVAL; - if (pool->ptr) /* should be atomic? */ - return 0; - pool->ptr = vmalloc(sizeof(struct snd_seq_event_cell) * pool->size); - if (!pool->ptr) + cellptr = vmalloc(sizeof(struct snd_seq_event_cell) * pool->size); + if (!cellptr) return -ENOMEM; /* add new cells to the free cell list */ spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags); + if (pool->ptr) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->lock, flags); + vfree(cellptr); + return 0; + } + + pool->ptr = cellptr; pool->free = NULL; for (cell = 0; cell < pool->size; cell++) { -- cgit v1.1 From 13d5e5d4725c64ec06040d636832e78453f477b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takashi Iwai Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:15:59 +0100 Subject: ALSA: seq: Fix double port list deletion The commit [7f0973e973cd: ALSA: seq: Fix lockdep warnings due to double mutex locks] split the management of two linked lists (source and destination) into two individual calls for avoiding the AB/BA deadlock. However, this may leave the possible double deletion of one of two lists when the counterpart is being deleted concurrently. It ends up with a list corruption, as revealed by syzkaller fuzzer. This patch fixes it by checking the list emptiness and skipping the deletion and the following process. BugLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+bay9qsrz6dQu31EcGaH9XwfW7o3oBzSQUG9fMszoh=Sg@mail.gmail.com Fixes: 7f0973e973cd ('ALSA: seq: Fix lockdep warnings due to 'double mutex locks) Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'sound/core') diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c index 921fb2b..fe686ee 100644 --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c @@ -535,19 +535,22 @@ static void delete_and_unsubscribe_port(struct snd_seq_client *client, bool is_src, bool ack) { struct snd_seq_port_subs_info *grp; + struct list_head *list; + bool empty; grp = is_src ? &port->c_src : &port->c_dest; + list = is_src ? &subs->src_list : &subs->dest_list; down_write(&grp->list_mutex); write_lock_irq(&grp->list_lock); - if (is_src) - list_del(&subs->src_list); - else - list_del(&subs->dest_list); + empty = list_empty(list); + if (!empty) + list_del_init(list); grp->exclusive = 0; write_unlock_irq(&grp->list_lock); up_write(&grp->list_mutex); - unsubscribe_port(client, port, grp, &subs->info, ack); + if (!empty) + unsubscribe_port(client, port, grp, &subs->info, ack); } /* connect two ports */ -- cgit v1.1 From 67ec1072b053c15564e6090ab30127895dc77a89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takashi Iwai Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:30:26 +0100 Subject: ALSA: pcm: Fix rwsem deadlock for non-atomic PCM stream A non-atomic PCM stream may take snd_pcm_link_rwsem rw semaphore twice in the same code path, e.g. one in snd_pcm_action_nonatomic() and another in snd_pcm_stream_lock(). Usually this is OK, but when a write lock is issued between these two read locks, the problem happens: the write lock is blocked due to the first reade lock, and the second read lock is also blocked by the write lock. This eventually deadlocks. The reason is the way rwsem manages waiters; it's queued like FIFO, so even if the writer itself doesn't take the lock yet, it blocks all the waiters (including reads) queued after it. As a workaround, in this patch, we replace the standard down_write() with an spinning loop. This is far from optimal, but it's good enough, as the spinning time is supposed to be relatively short for normal PCM operations, and the code paths requiring the write lock aren't called so often. Reported-by: Vinod Koul Tested-by: Ramesh Babu Cc: # v3.18+ Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- sound/core/pcm_native.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'sound/core') diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c index fadd3eb..9106d8e 100644 --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c @@ -74,6 +74,18 @@ static int snd_pcm_open(struct file *file, struct snd_pcm *pcm, int stream); static DEFINE_RWLOCK(snd_pcm_link_rwlock); static DECLARE_RWSEM(snd_pcm_link_rwsem); +/* Writer in rwsem may block readers even during its waiting in queue, + * and this may lead to a deadlock when the code path takes read sem + * twice (e.g. one in snd_pcm_action_nonatomic() and another in + * snd_pcm_stream_lock()). As a (suboptimal) workaround, let writer to + * spin until it gets the lock. + */ +static inline void down_write_nonblock(struct rw_semaphore *lock) +{ + while (!down_write_trylock(lock)) + cond_resched(); +} + /** * snd_pcm_stream_lock - Lock the PCM stream * @substream: PCM substream @@ -1813,7 +1825,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_link(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int fd) res = -ENOMEM; goto _nolock; } - down_write(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem); + down_write_nonblock(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem); write_lock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock); if (substream->runtime->status->state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_OPEN || substream->runtime->status->state != substream1->runtime->status->state || @@ -1860,7 +1872,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_unlink(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) struct snd_pcm_substream *s; int res = 0; - down_write(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem); + down_write_nonblock(&snd_pcm_link_rwsem); write_lock_irq(&snd_pcm_link_rwlock); if (!snd_pcm_stream_linked(substream)) { res = -EALREADY; -- cgit v1.1