From 15e473046cb6e5d18a4d0057e61d76315230382b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:12:54 +0000 Subject: netlink: Rename pid to portid to avoid confusion It is a frequent mistake to confuse the netlink port identifier with a process identifier. Try to reduce this confusion by renaming fields that hold port identifiers portid instead of pid. I have carefully avoided changing the structures exported to userspace to avoid changing the userspace API. I have successfully built an allyesconfig kernel with this change. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/nfc/netlink.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/nfc/netlink.c') diff --git a/net/nfc/netlink.c b/net/nfc/netlink.c index 4c51714..4bbb70e 100644 --- a/net/nfc/netlink.c +++ b/net/nfc/netlink.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_send_target(struct sk_buff *msg, struct nfc_target *target, { void *hdr; - hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).pid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, &nfc_genl_family, flags, NFC_CMD_GET_TARGET); if (!hdr) return -EMSGSIZE; @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int nfc_genl_targets_found(struct nfc_dev *dev) struct sk_buff *msg; void *hdr; - dev->genl_data.poll_req_pid = 0; + dev->genl_data.poll_req_portid = 0; msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!msg) @@ -347,13 +347,13 @@ free_msg: } static int nfc_genl_send_device(struct sk_buff *msg, struct nfc_dev *dev, - u32 pid, u32 seq, + u32 portid, u32 seq, struct netlink_callback *cb, int flags) { void *hdr; - hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, pid, seq, &nfc_genl_family, flags, + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, portid, seq, &nfc_genl_family, flags, NFC_CMD_GET_DEVICE); if (!hdr) return -EMSGSIZE; @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_dump_devices(struct sk_buff *skb, while (dev) { int rc; - rc = nfc_genl_send_device(skb, dev, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).pid, + rc = nfc_genl_send_device(skb, dev, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, cb, NLM_F_MULTI); if (rc < 0) break; @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_get_device(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) goto out_putdev; } - rc = nfc_genl_send_device(msg, dev, info->snd_pid, info->snd_seq, + rc = nfc_genl_send_device(msg, dev, info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, NULL, 0); if (rc < 0) goto out_free; @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int nfc_genl_start_poll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) rc = nfc_start_poll(dev, im_protocols, tm_protocols); if (!rc) - dev->genl_data.poll_req_pid = info->snd_pid; + dev->genl_data.poll_req_portid = info->snd_portid; mutex_unlock(&dev->genl_data.genl_data_mutex); @@ -645,13 +645,13 @@ static int nfc_genl_stop_poll(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) mutex_lock(&dev->genl_data.genl_data_mutex); - if (dev->genl_data.poll_req_pid != info->snd_pid) { + if (dev->genl_data.poll_req_portid != info->snd_portid) { rc = -EBUSY; goto out; } rc = nfc_stop_poll(dev); - dev->genl_data.poll_req_pid = 0; + dev->genl_data.poll_req_portid = 0; out: mutex_unlock(&dev->genl_data.genl_data_mutex); @@ -771,15 +771,15 @@ static int nfc_genl_rcv_nl_event(struct notifier_block *this, if (event != NETLINK_URELEASE || n->protocol != NETLINK_GENERIC) goto out; - pr_debug("NETLINK_URELEASE event from id %d\n", n->pid); + pr_debug("NETLINK_URELEASE event from id %d\n", n->portid); nfc_device_iter_init(&iter); dev = nfc_device_iter_next(&iter); while (dev) { - if (dev->genl_data.poll_req_pid == n->pid) { + if (dev->genl_data.poll_req_portid == n->portid) { nfc_stop_poll(dev); - dev->genl_data.poll_req_pid = 0; + dev->genl_data.poll_req_portid = 0; } dev = nfc_device_iter_next(&iter); } @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ out: void nfc_genl_data_init(struct nfc_genl_data *genl_data) { - genl_data->poll_req_pid = 0; + genl_data->poll_req_portid = 0; mutex_init(&genl_data->genl_data_mutex); } -- cgit v1.1