From 63fc33ceb0ccc08b3f62d7bfe56a33eb33ca9427 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Drake Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:32:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mac80211: improved 802.11g CTS protection Currently, CTS protection is partially implemented twice: 1. via prism2 ioctls, only used by hostapd 2. via STA beacon parsing, recorded in sta.use_protection but never used (other than printed in debugfs) Protection control should be implemented on a per-subif basis. For example, a single physical device may be running a soft AP on one channel, and a STA on another. The AP interface should use protection based on what hostapd told it, and the STA interface should use protection based on beacon parsing. These should operate independantly: one subif using protection should not influence the other. To implement this, I moved the use_protection flag into ieee80211_sub_if_data and removed the device-global cts_protect_erp_frames flag. I also made the PRISM2_PARAM_CTS_PROTECT_ERP_FRAMES write operation only available for AP interfaces, to avoid any possibility of the user messing with the behaviour of a STA. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c') diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c index 9e39646..a3e01d7 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c +++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_netdev.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static ssize_t ieee80211_if_fmt_flags( sdata->u.sta.authenticated ? "AUTH\n" : "", sdata->u.sta.associated ? "ASSOC\n" : "", sdata->u.sta.probereq_poll ? "PROBEREQ POLL\n" : "", - sdata->u.sta.use_protection ? "CTS prot\n" : ""); + sdata->use_protection ? "CTS prot\n" : ""); } __IEEE80211_IF_FILE(flags); -- cgit v1.1