From 4b6cb5d8e3f5707d7a2e55cf7b05f1ea8bfc7a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:41:09 -0700 Subject: [INET]: Small cleanup for xxx_put after evictor consolidation After the evictor code is consolidated there is no need in passing the extra pointer to the xxx_put() functions. The only place when it made sense was the evictor code itself. Maybe this change must got with the previous (or with the next) patch, but I try to make them shorter as much as possible to simplify the review (but they are still large anyway), so this change goes in a separate patch. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/ipv6/reassembly.c') diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c index 02e4e85..98d8fbd 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c +++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c @@ -169,10 +169,10 @@ static inline struct frag_queue *frag_alloc_queue(void) /* Destruction primitives. */ -static __inline__ void fq_put(struct frag_queue *fq, int *work) +static __inline__ void fq_put(struct frag_queue *fq) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fq->q.refcnt)) - inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &ip6_frags, work); + inet_frag_destroy(&fq->q, &ip6_frags, NULL); } /* Kill fq entry. It is not destroyed immediately, @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ out: if (dev) dev_put(dev); spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock); - fq_put(fq, NULL); + fq_put(fq); } /* Creation primitives. */ @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in) atomic_inc(&fq->q.refcnt); write_unlock(&ip6_frags.lock); fq_in->q.last_in |= COMPLETE; - fq_put(fq_in, NULL); + fq_put(fq_in); return fq; } } @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static int ipv6_frag_rcv(struct sk_buff **skbp) ret = ip6_frag_queue(fq, skb, fhdr, IP6CB(skb)->nhoff); spin_unlock(&fq->q.lock); - fq_put(fq, NULL); + fq_put(fq); return ret; } -- cgit v1.1