From f111adfdd7ff7d9fe54b6efa440b80824984749c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:04:09 +0000 Subject: timekeeping: Use timekeeping_update() instead of memcpy() We already have a function which does the right thing, that also makes sure that the coming ktime_t based cached values are getting updated. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: John Stultz --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time') diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 7ca150a..bfe3ea0 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -883,8 +883,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void) tmp.tv_nsec = 0; tk_set_sleep_time(tk, tmp); - memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper, - sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper)); + timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR); write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags); -- cgit v1.1