From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/clocksource.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 150242c..665985b 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ void clocksource_mark_unstable(struct clocksource *cs) static void clocksource_watchdog(unsigned long data) { struct clocksource *cs; - cycle_t csnow, wdnow, cslast, wdlast, delta; + u64 csnow, wdnow, cslast, wdlast, delta; int64_t wd_nsec, cs_nsec; int next_cpu, reset_pending; -- cgit v1.1