From 930aa174fcc8b0efaad102fd80f677b92f35eaa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mel Gorman Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:29:37 +0100 Subject: sched/numa: Remove the numa_balancing_scan_period_reset sysctl With scan rate adaptions based on whether the workload has properly converged or not there should be no need for the scan period reset hammer. Get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Srikar Dronamraju Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-60-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sysctl.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/sysctl.c') diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c index 42f616a..e509b90 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c @@ -371,13 +371,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = { .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, }, { - .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_reset", - .data = &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset, - .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), - .mode = 0644, - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, - }, - { .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_max_ms", .data = &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max, .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), -- cgit v1.1