From e0f23060adfa3f27beaa7918eff70258b88471b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:29:39 -0700 Subject: rcu: Update comments to reflect softirqs vs. kthreads We now have kthreads only for flavors of RCU that support boosting, so update the now-misleading comments accordingly. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/rcutree_plugin.h') diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index a90bf3c..ecd48a2 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -1478,7 +1478,8 @@ static int rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop(int cpu) /* * Per-CPU kernel thread that invokes RCU callbacks. This replaces the - * earlier RCU softirq. + * RCU softirq used in flavors and configurations of RCU that do not + * support RCU priority boosting. */ static int rcu_cpu_kthread(void *arg) { -- cgit v1.1