From f9ffc31ebd38d2d74dbfe9f0b67274e99ad668f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 11:51:06 -0700 Subject: rcu: Change EXPORT_SYMBOL() to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() Commit e6b80a3b (rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state) exported the pre-existing rcu_is_cpu_idle() function using EXPORT_SYMBOL(). However, this is inconsistent with the remaining exports from RCU, which are all EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). The current state of affairs means that a non-GPL module could use rcu_is_cpu_idle(), but in a CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y kernel would be unable to invoke rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(). This commit therefore makes rcu_is_cpu_idle()'s export be consistent with the rest of RCU, namely EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/rcutree.c') diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 910d868..1b123e1 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ int rcu_is_cpu_idle(void) preempt_enable(); return ret; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_is_cpu_idle); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_is_cpu_idle); /** * __rcu_is_watching - are RCU read-side critical sections safe? -- cgit v1.1