From 37f08be11be9a7d9351fb1b9b408259519a126f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marcos Paulo de Souza Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:57:47 +0100 Subject: PM / Freezer: Remove references to TIF_FREEZE in comments This patch removes all the references in the code about the TIF_FREEZE flag removed by commit a3201227f803ad7fd43180c5195dbe5a2bf998aa freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead of TIF_FREEZE There still are some references to TIF_FREEZE in Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt, but it looks like that documentation needs more thorough work to reflect how the new freezer works, and hence merely removing the references to TIF_FREEZE won't really help. So I have not touched that part in this patch. Suggested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- kernel/power/process.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/power') diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c index 6aeb5ef..0d2aeb2 100644 --- a/kernel/power/process.c +++ b/kernel/power/process.c @@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only) * It is "frozen enough". If the task does wake * up, it will immediately call try_to_freeze. * - * Because freeze_task() goes through p's - * scheduler lock after setting TIF_FREEZE, it's - * guaranteed that either we see TASK_RUNNING or - * try_to_stop() after schedule() in ptrace/signal - * stop sees TIF_FREEZE. + * Because freeze_task() goes through p's scheduler lock, it's + * guaranteed that TASK_STOPPED/TRACED -> TASK_RUNNING + * transition can't race with task state testing here. */ if (!task_is_stopped_or_traced(p) && !freezer_should_skip(p)) -- cgit v1.1