From be3e7844980352756de4261b276ee2ba5be7a26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:45:21 +0200 Subject: locking/spinlock: Update spin_unlock_wait() users With the modified semantics of spin_unlock_wait() a number of explicit barriers can be removed. Also update the comment for the do_exit() usecase, as that was somewhat stale/obscure. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/exit.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/exit.c') diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 9e6e135..0b40791 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -700,10 +700,14 @@ void do_exit(long code) exit_signals(tsk); /* sets PF_EXITING */ /* - * tsk->flags are checked in the futex code to protect against - * an exiting task cleaning up the robust pi futexes. + * Ensure that all new tsk->pi_lock acquisitions must observe + * PF_EXITING. Serializes against futex.c:attach_to_pi_owner(). */ smp_mb(); + /* + * Ensure that we must observe the pi_state in exit_mm() -> + * mm_release() -> exit_pi_state_list(). + */ raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock); if (unlikely(in_atomic())) { -- cgit v1.1