From 93315ed6dd12dacfc941f9eb8ca0293aadf99793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amy Griffis Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:05:27 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] audit string fields interface + consumer Updated patch to dynamically allocate audit rule fields in kernel's internal representation. Added unlikely() calls for testing memory allocation result. Amy Griffis wrote: [Wed Jan 11 2006, 02:02:31PM EST] > Modify audit's kernel-userspace interface to allow the specification > of string fields in audit rules. > > Signed-off-by: Amy Griffis Signed-off-by: Al Viro (cherry picked from 5ffc4a863f92351b720fe3e9c5cd647accff9e03 commit) --- kernel/auditsc.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/auditsc.c') diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c index 17719b3..ba08788 100644 --- a/kernel/auditsc.c +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c @@ -162,70 +162,68 @@ struct audit_context { /* Compare a task_struct with an audit_rule. Return 1 on match, 0 * otherwise. */ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, - struct audit_rule *rule, + struct audit_krule *rule, struct audit_context *ctx, enum audit_state *state) { int i, j; for (i = 0; i < rule->field_count; i++) { - u32 field = rule->fields[i] & ~AUDIT_OPERATORS; - u32 op = rule->fields[i] & AUDIT_OPERATORS; - u32 value = rule->values[i]; + struct audit_field *f = &rule->fields[i]; int result = 0; - switch (field) { + switch (f->type) { case AUDIT_PID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->pid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->pid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_UID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->uid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->uid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_EUID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->euid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->euid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_SUID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->suid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->suid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_FSUID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->fsuid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->fsuid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_GID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->gid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->gid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_EGID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->egid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->egid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_SGID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->sgid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->sgid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_FSGID: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->fsgid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->fsgid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_PERS: - result = audit_comparator(tsk->personality, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(tsk->personality, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_ARCH: if (ctx) - result = audit_comparator(ctx->arch, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(ctx->arch, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_EXIT: if (ctx && ctx->return_valid) - result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_code, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_code, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_SUCCESS: if (ctx && ctx->return_valid) { - if (value) - result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, op, AUDITSC_SUCCESS); + if (f->val) + result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, f->op, AUDITSC_SUCCESS); else - result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, op, AUDITSC_FAILURE); + result = audit_comparator(ctx->return_valid, f->op, AUDITSC_FAILURE); } break; case AUDIT_DEVMAJOR: if (ctx) { for (j = 0; j < ctx->name_count; j++) { - if (audit_comparator(MAJOR(ctx->names[j].dev), op, value)) { + if (audit_comparator(MAJOR(ctx->names[j].dev), f->op, f->val)) { ++result; break; } @@ -235,7 +233,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, case AUDIT_DEVMINOR: if (ctx) { for (j = 0; j < ctx->name_count; j++) { - if (audit_comparator(MINOR(ctx->names[j].dev), op, value)) { + if (audit_comparator(MINOR(ctx->names[j].dev), f->op, f->val)) { ++result; break; } @@ -245,8 +243,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, case AUDIT_INODE: if (ctx) { for (j = 0; j < ctx->name_count; j++) { - if (audit_comparator(ctx->names[j].ino, op, value) || - audit_comparator(ctx->names[j].pino, op, value)) { + if (audit_comparator(ctx->names[j].ino, f->op, f->val) || + audit_comparator(ctx->names[j].pino, f->op, f->val)) { ++result; break; } @@ -256,14 +254,14 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, case AUDIT_LOGINUID: result = 0; if (ctx) - result = audit_comparator(ctx->loginuid, op, value); + result = audit_comparator(ctx->loginuid, f->op, f->val); break; case AUDIT_ARG0: case AUDIT_ARG1: case AUDIT_ARG2: case AUDIT_ARG3: if (ctx) - result = audit_comparator(ctx->argv[field-AUDIT_ARG0], op, value); + result = audit_comparator(ctx->argv[f->type-AUDIT_ARG0], f->op, f->val); break; } -- cgit v1.1