From eef90ccb8a4d50b219a95cc53878ebb007315b32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:53:17 +0000 Subject: drm/i915: Use the reloc.handle as an index into the execbuffer array Using copywinwin10 as an example that is dependent upon emitting a lot of relocations (2 per operation), we see improvements of: c2d/gm45: 618000.0/sec to 623000.0/sec. i3-330m: 748000.0/sec to 789000.0/sec. (measured relative to a baseline with neither optimisations applied). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Imre Deak Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h') diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h index 2430b6a..07d5941 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait { #define I915_PARAM_HAS_SECURE_BATCHES 23 #define I915_PARAM_HAS_PINNED_BATCHES 24 #define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_NO_RELOC 25 +#define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT 26 typedef struct drm_i915_getparam { int param; @@ -699,7 +700,12 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 { */ #define I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC (1<<11) -#define __I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS -(I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC<<1) +/** Use the reloc.handle as an index into the exec object array rather + * than as the per-file handle. + */ +#define I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT (1<<12) + +#define __I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS -(I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT<<1) #define I915_EXEC_CONTEXT_ID_MASK (0xffffffff) #define i915_execbuffer2_set_context_id(eb2, context) \ -- cgit v1.1