From 46bcf14f44d8f31ecfdc8b6708ec15a3b33316d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:29:43 -0800 Subject: filter: fix sk_filter rcu handling Pavel Emelyanov tried to fix a race between sk_filter_(de|at)tach and sk_clone() in commit 47e958eac280c263397 Problem is we can have several clones sharing a common sk_filter, and these clones might want to sk_filter_attach() their own filters at the same time, and can overwrite old_filter->rcu, corrupting RCU queues. We can not use filter->rcu without being sure no other thread could do the same thing. Switch code to a more conventional ref-counting technique : Do the atomic decrement immediately and queue one rcu call back when last reference is released. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/net/sock.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/net/sock.h') diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index a6338d0..659d968d9 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1155,6 +1155,8 @@ extern void sk_common_release(struct sock *sk); /* Initialise core socket variables */ extern void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk); +extern void sk_filter_release_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu); + /** * sk_filter_release - release a socket filter * @fp: filter to remove @@ -1165,7 +1167,7 @@ extern void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk); static inline void sk_filter_release(struct sk_filter *fp) { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fp->refcnt)) - kfree(fp); + call_rcu_bh(&fp->rcu, sk_filter_release_rcu); } static inline void sk_filter_uncharge(struct sock *sk, struct sk_filter *fp) -- cgit v1.1