From 8ba8e95ed14a2771bbcb43300feda094f298853e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 01:41:22 +0200 Subject: Fix comments: s/granuality/granularity/ I was grepping through the code and some `grep ganularity -R .` didn't catch what I thought. Then looking closer I saw the term "granuality" used in only four places (in comments) and granularity in many more places describing the same idea. Some other facts: dictionary.com does not know such a word define:granuality on google is not found (and pages for granuality are mostly related to patches to the kernel) it has not been discussed as a term on LKML, AFAICS (=Can Search) To be consistent, I think granularity should be used everywhere. Signed-off-by: Kalin KOZHUHAROV Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- include/linux/fs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux') diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 4ed7e60..1e9ebab 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ struct super_block { */ struct mutex s_vfs_rename_mutex; /* Kludge */ - /* Granuality of c/m/atime in ns. + /* Granularity of c/m/atime in ns. Cannot be worse than a second */ u32 s_time_gran; }; -- cgit v1.1