From a020ed7521a9737bcf3e34eb880867c60c3c68d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 15:49:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] SPI: busnum == 0 needs to work We need to be able to have a "SPI bus 0" matching chip numbering; but that number was wrongly used to flag dynamic allocation of a bus number. This patch resolves that issue; now negative numbers trigger dynamic alloc. It also updates the how-to-write-a-controller-driver overview to mention this stuff. Signed-off-by: David Brownell Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/spi/spi.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/spi/spi.h') diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h index 77add90..e928c0d 100644 --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h @@ -172,13 +172,13 @@ static inline void spi_unregister_driver(struct spi_driver *sdrv) struct spi_master { struct class_device cdev; - /* other than zero (== assign one dynamically), bus_num is fully + /* other than negative (== assign one dynamically), bus_num is fully * board-specific. usually that simplifies to being SOC-specific. - * example: one SOC has three SPI controllers, numbered 1..3, + * example: one SOC has three SPI controllers, numbered 0..2, * and one board's schematics might show it using SPI-2. software * would normally use bus_num=2 for that controller. */ - u16 bus_num; + s16 bus_num; /* chipselects will be integral to many controllers; some others * might use board-specific GPIOs. -- cgit v1.1