From c41564b5af328ea4600b26119f6c9c8e1eb5c28b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Scott Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:55:14 +1000 Subject: [XFS] We really suck at spulling. Thanks to Chris Pascoe for fixing all these typos. SGI-PV: 904196 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:25539a Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott --- fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h index 82a08ba..4f6a034 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ typedef __uint32_t xfs_dqid_t; /* - * Eventhough users may not have quota limits occupying all 64-bits, + * Even though users may not have quota limits occupying all 64-bits, * they may need 64-bit accounting. Hence, 64-bit quota-counters, * and quota-limits. This is a waste in the common case, but hey ... */ @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_qoff_logformat { #ifdef __KERNEL__ /* * This check is done typically without holding the inode lock; - * that may seem racey, but it is harmless in the context that it is used. + * that may seem racy, but it is harmless in the context that it is used. * The inode cannot go inactive as long a reference is kept, and * therefore if dquot(s) were attached, they'll stay consistent. * If, for example, the ownership of the inode changes while -- cgit v1.1