From 6109c85037e53443f29fd39c0de69f578a1cf285 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:05:57 -0500 Subject: locks: add a dedicated spinlock to protect i_flctx lists We can now add a dedicated spinlock without expanding struct inode. Change to using that to protect the various i_flctx lists. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/nfsd') diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index fad8219..80242f5 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -5572,14 +5572,14 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner) flctx = inode->i_flctx; if (flctx && !list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix)) { - spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock); list_for_each_entry(fl, &flctx->flc_posix, fl_list) { if (fl->fl_owner == (fl_owner_t)lowner) { status = true; break; } } - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); + spin_unlock(&flctx->flc_lock); } fput(filp); return status; -- cgit v1.1