From a25c75d5ad04df0a7abd09585231b4021a91a358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:59:29 +0300 Subject: Btrfs: cleanup: use consistent lock naming It confuses Smatch that we use two names for the same lock. Plus the shorter name is nicer. This doesn't change how the code works, it's just a cleanup. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 49fd7b6..59ae191 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ again: space_info->chunk_alloc = 0; spin_unlock(&space_info->lock); out: - mutex_unlock(&extent_root->fs_info->chunk_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); return ret; } -- cgit v1.1