From 362f924b64ba0f4be2ee0cb697690c33d40be721 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:39:41 +0100 Subject: x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macros Those are stupid and code should use static_cpu_has_safe() or boot_cpu_has() instead. Kill the least used and unused ones. The remaining ones need more careful inspection before a conversion can happen. On the TODO. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449481182-27541-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Cc: David Sterba Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Matt Mackall Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 974be09..42a378a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int check_async_write(struct inode *inode, unsigned long bio_flags) if (bio_flags & EXTENT_BIO_TREE_LOG) return 0; #ifdef CONFIG_X86 - if (cpu_has_xmm4_2) + if (static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_XMM4_2)) return 0; #endif return 1; -- cgit v1.1