From 6596a9281995a3c7dee8ca6666bd169fffc928e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:28:05 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: don't bug_on when we fail when cleaning up transactions There is no reason for this sort of jackassery. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/transaction.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index 18f7e71..ea8d522 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -1942,6 +1942,5 @@ int btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(struct btrfs_root *root) * If we encounter a transaction abort during snapshot cleaning, we * don't want to crash here */ - BUG_ON(ret < 0 && ret != -EAGAIN && ret != -EROFS); - return 1; + return (ret < 0) ? 0 : 1; } -- cgit v1.1