From 3abdbd780e9d75f0648b8a502c3789857b1e92ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:10:45 +0200 Subject: btrfs: make close_ctree return void There's no user of the return value and we can get rid of the comment in put_super. Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/super.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index c4124de..568ddc1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -307,13 +307,7 @@ void __btrfs_panic(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *function, static void btrfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) { - (void)close_ctree(btrfs_sb(sb)->tree_root); - /* FIXME: need to fix VFS to return error? */ - /* AV: return it _where_? ->put_super() can be triggered by any number - * of async events, up to and including delivery of SIGKILL to the - * last process that kept it busy. Or segfault in the aforementioned - * process... Whom would you report that to? - */ + close_ctree(btrfs_sb(sb)->tree_root); } enum { -- cgit v1.1