From 4987ce82056327a43cd58c32adf8a3f255e7d862 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:42:30 -0600 Subject: PCI: Drop is_64bit_address() and is_mask_bit_support() macros is_64bit_address() and is_mask_bit_support() don't provide any useful abstraction, so drop them. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas --- drivers/pci/msi.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/pci/msi.c') diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c index 1688c26..aaaf954 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -555,9 +555,9 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec) return -ENOMEM; entry->msi_attrib.is_msix = 0; - entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = is_64bit_address(control); + entry->msi_attrib.is_64 = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT); entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr = 0; - entry->msi_attrib.maskbit = is_mask_bit_support(control); + entry->msi_attrib.maskbit = !!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT); entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; /* Save IOAPIC IRQ */ entry->msi_attrib.pos = dev->msi_cap; -- cgit v1.1