From 453b0c3f6910672f79da354077af728d92f95c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amitkumar Karwar Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:55:38 -0700 Subject: mwifiex: fix SDIO interrupt lost issue 601216e "mwifiex: process RX packets in SDIO IRQ thread directly" introduced a command timeout issue which can be reproduced easily on an AM33xx platform using a test application written by Daniel Mack: https://gist.github.com/zonque/6579314 mwifiex_main_process() is called from both the SDIO handler and the workqueue. In case an interrupt occurs right after the int_status check, but before updating the mwifiex_processing flag, this interrupt gets lost, resulting in a command timeout and consequently a card reset. Let main_proc_lock protect both int_status and mwifiex_processing flag. This fixes the interrupt lost issue. Cc: # 3.7+ Reported-by: Sven Neumann Reported-by: Andreas Fenkart Tested-by: Daniel Mack Reviewed-by: Dylan Reid Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao Signed-off-by: Paul Stewart Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c index fd77833..c2b91f5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.c @@ -358,10 +358,12 @@ process_start: } } while (true); - if ((adapter->int_status) || IS_CARD_RX_RCVD(adapter)) + spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags); + if ((adapter->int_status) || IS_CARD_RX_RCVD(adapter)) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags); goto process_start; + } - spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags); adapter->mwifiex_processing = false; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->main_proc_lock, flags); -- cgit v1.1