From 9bbd7d9a3528de1b5b915fa77df027b4de62174c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Hutchings Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 21:18:48 +0100 Subject: sfc: Use DMA_BIT_MASK() instead of our own DMA mask macros Also change type of efx_nic_type::max_dma_mask to u64, matching pci_dma_supported() parameter type. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/net/sfc/bitfield.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/sfc/bitfield.h') diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/bitfield.h b/drivers/net/sfc/bitfield.h index c98a591..2c79d27 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sfc/bitfield.h +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/bitfield.h @@ -501,8 +501,5 @@ typedef union efx_oword { #define DMA_ADDR_T_WIDTH (8 * sizeof(dma_addr_t)) #define EFX_DMA_TYPE_WIDTH(width) \ (((width) < DMA_ADDR_T_WIDTH) ? (width) : DMA_ADDR_T_WIDTH) -#define EFX_DMA_MAX_MASK ((DMA_ADDR_T_WIDTH == 64) ? \ - ~((u64) 0) : ~((u32) 0)) -#define EFX_DMA_MASK(mask) ((mask) & EFX_DMA_MAX_MASK) #endif /* EFX_BITFIELD_H */ -- cgit v1.1