From 90182317a9e383474613aa60e9d61d57bdf17c3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Liu Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:44:36 -0400 Subject: mfd: Fix max8925 irq control bit incorrect setting In max8925_irq_sync_unlock(), irq control bit is set at the same time. Zero means enabling irq, and one means disabling irq. The original code is: irq_chg[0] &= irq_data->enable; It should be changed to: irq_chg[0] &= ~irq_data->enable; Otherwise, irq control bit is mess. Signed-off-by: Kevin Liu Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz --- drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c') diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c b/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c index 04028a9..428377a 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/max8925-core.c @@ -429,24 +429,25 @@ static void max8925_irq_sync_unlock(unsigned int irq) irq_tsc = cache_tsc; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(max8925_irqs); i++) { irq_data = &max8925_irqs[i]; + /* 1 -- disable, 0 -- enable */ switch (irq_data->mask_reg) { case MAX8925_CHG_IRQ1_MASK: - irq_chg[0] &= irq_data->enable; + irq_chg[0] &= ~irq_data->enable; break; case MAX8925_CHG_IRQ2_MASK: - irq_chg[1] &= irq_data->enable; + irq_chg[1] &= ~irq_data->enable; break; case MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ1_MASK: - irq_on[0] &= irq_data->enable; + irq_on[0] &= ~irq_data->enable; break; case MAX8925_ON_OFF_IRQ2_MASK: - irq_on[1] &= irq_data->enable; + irq_on[1] &= ~irq_data->enable; break; case MAX8925_RTC_IRQ_MASK: - irq_rtc &= irq_data->enable; + irq_rtc &= ~irq_data->enable; break; case MAX8925_TSC_IRQ_MASK: - irq_tsc &= irq_data->enable; + irq_tsc &= ~irq_data->enable; break; default: dev_err(chip->dev, "wrong IRQ\n"); -- cgit v1.1