From e467b6421435f467e274d4f25d62900e1e0e4286 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ohad Ben-Cohen Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:42:36 +0300 Subject: hwspinlock/core: simplify 'owner' handling Use struct device_driver's owner member instead of asking drivers to explicitly pass the owner again. This simplifies drivers and also save some memory, since there's no point now in maintaining a separate owner pointer per hwspinlock. Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen --- drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c') diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c index a8f0273..1d19fe9 100644 --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ static int __devinit omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } omap_lock->lock.dev = &pdev->dev; - omap_lock->lock.owner = THIS_MODULE; omap_lock->lock.id = i; omap_lock->lock.ops = &omap_hwspinlock_ops; omap_lock->addr = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i; @@ -208,6 +207,7 @@ static struct platform_driver omap_hwspinlock_driver = { .remove = omap_hwspinlock_remove, .driver = { .name = "omap_hwspinlock", + .owner = THIS_MODULE, }, }; -- cgit v1.1