From e725d26c4857e5e41975b5e74e64ce6ab09a7121 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukasz Majewski Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:14:20 +0100 Subject: cpufreq: exynos: Use device tree to determine if cpufreq cooling should be registered With thermal subsystem rework it is necessary to tune current cpufreq code to use cpu frequency change as a potential cooling device. Now the cpu cooling device is registered only when proper nodes and properties are available in device tree. Lack of them, however, will not prevent cpufreq for normal operation. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index f99a0b0..5e98c6b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -18,10 +18,13 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include #include "exynos-cpufreq.h" static struct exynos_dvfs_info *exynos_info; +static struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev; static struct regulator *arm_regulator; static unsigned int locking_frequency; @@ -156,6 +159,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct device_node *cpus, *np; int ret = -EINVAL; exynos_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*exynos_info), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -198,9 +202,36 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Done here as we want to capture boot frequency */ locking_frequency = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000; - if (!cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver)) + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver); + if (ret) + goto err_cpufreq_reg; + + cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); + if (!cpus) { + pr_err("failed to find cpus node\n"); + return 0; + } + + np = of_get_next_child(cpus, NULL); + if (!np) { + pr_err("failed to find cpus child node\n"); + of_node_put(cpus); return 0; + } + + if (of_find_property(np, "#cooling-cells", NULL)) { + cdev = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(np, + cpu_present_mask); + if (IS_ERR(cdev)) + pr_err("running cpufreq without cooling device: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(cdev)); + } + of_node_put(np); + of_node_put(cpus); + + return 0; +err_cpufreq_reg: dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register cpufreq driver\n"); regulator_put(arm_regulator); err_vdd_arm: -- cgit v1.1 From 8b2b4a4e5366341d0d93607a3e035ced5fb918e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:35:18 -0400 Subject: cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build The exynos cpufreq driver code recently gained a dependency on the cooling code, which may be a loadable module. This breaks an ARM allmodconfig build: drivers/built-in.o: In function `exynos_cpufreq_probe': :(.text+0x1748e8): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register' To avoid this problem, change cpufreq Kconfig to allow the drivers to be loadable modules as well and enforce a dependency on the thermal module. This change, in order to allow module builds on this cpufreq driver, properly constructs the driver into a single module, instead of several modules. The change also keeps the proper platform dependency, and therefore, it wont load in platforms that are not supposed to be loaded. The user will be able to build the support for all platforms, or select which platforms (s)he wants (as originally), except that now it can be a module, instead. Besides, it will still keep the driver only on those configs that expect it to be on. And it won't compile/load on platforms that it is not supposed to. It brings the config ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW closer to this driver, so it looks better in the menuconfig. We intentionally change ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ to be tristate too, to avoid future troubles. Cc: Viresh Kumar Cc: Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e725d26c4857 ("cpufreq: exynos: Use device tree to determine if cpufreq cooling should be registered") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 9 +++++---- 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm index 0f9a2c3..1b06fc4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm @@ -26,13 +26,21 @@ config ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ - bool + tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS CPUfreq Driver" + depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412 || SOC_EXYNOS5250 + depends on THERMAL + help + This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS platforms. + Supported SoC versions are: + Exynos4210, Exynos4212, Exynos4412, and Exynos5250. + + If in doubt, say N. config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4210" depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 + depends on ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ default y - select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ help This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS4210 SoC (S5PV310 or S5PC210). @@ -42,8 +50,8 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ config ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4x12" depends on SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412 + depends on ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ default y - select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ help This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS4X12 SoC (EXYNOS4212 or EXYNOS4412). @@ -53,28 +61,14 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ config ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5250" depends on SOC_EXYNOS5250 + depends on ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ default y - select ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ help This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5250 SoC. If in doubt, say N. -config ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ - bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5440" - depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440 - depends on HAVE_CLK && OF - select PM_OPP - default y - help - This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5440 - SoC. The nature of exynos5440 clock controller is - different than previous exynos controllers so not using - the common exynos framework. - - If in doubt, say N. - config ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW bool "EXYNOS Frequency Overclocking - Software" depends on ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ && THERMAL @@ -90,6 +84,20 @@ config ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW If in doubt, say N. +config ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ + tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5440" + depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440 + depends on HAVE_CLK && OF + select PM_OPP + default y + help + This adds the CPUFreq driver for Samsung EXYNOS5440 + SoC. The nature of exynos5440 clock controller is + different than previous exynos controllers so not using + the common exynos framework. + + If in doubt, say N. + config ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ tristate "Calxeda Highbank-based" depends on ARCH_HIGHBANK && CPUFREQ_DT && REGULATOR diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile index b3ca7b0..b26e2bf 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile @@ -51,10 +51,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += arm_big_little_dt.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += exynos-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ) += exynos4210-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ) += exynos4x12-cpufreq.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ) += exynos5250-cpufreq.o +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o +arm-exynos-cpufreq-y := exynos-cpufreq.o +arm-exynos-cpufreq-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4210_CPUFREQ) += exynos4210-cpufreq.o +arm-exynos-cpufreq-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS4X12_CPUFREQ) += exynos4x12-cpufreq.o +arm-exynos-cpufreq-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5250_CPUFREQ) += exynos5250-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ) += imx6q-cpufreq.o -- cgit v1.1