From be49e3465f222b4b796be8a21d14afbfd8f5d20f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:13:19 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: add new routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them automatically. This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() and updates others to use it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c index 10f3cfb..b9336ed 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, pr_debug("request for verification of policy (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n", policy->min, policy->max, policy->cpu); - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); for (; freq = table[i].frequency, freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) { if (freq == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) @@ -77,8 +76,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (!found) { policy->max = next_larger; - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(policy); } pr_debug("verification lead to (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n", -- cgit v1.1