From af040ffc9ba1e079ee4c0748aff64fa3d4716fa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 19:43:15 +0100 Subject: ARM: make it easier to check the CPU part number correctly Ensure that platform maintainers check the CPU part number in the right manner: the CPU part number is meaningless without also checking the CPU implement(e|o)r (choose your preferred spelling!) Provide an interface which returns both the implementer and part number together, and update the definitions to include the implementer. Mark the old function as being deprecated... indeed, using the old function with the definitions will now always evaluate as false, so people must update their un-merged code to the new function. While this could be avoided by adding new definitions, we'd also have to create new names for them which would be awkward. Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Russell King --- drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c index 60e5a170..e683377 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static void __init global_timer_of_register(struct device_node *np) * fire when the timer value is greater than or equal to. In previous * revisions the comparators fired when the timer value was equal to. */ - if (read_cpuid_part_number() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 + if (read_cpuid_part() == ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 && (read_cpuid_id() & 0xf0000f) < 0x200000) { pr_warn("global-timer: non support for this cpu version.\n"); return; -- cgit v1.1