From bf6263a853c9c143bf03f0a6fdcc68ab714fb5f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Garzik Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 12:16:50 -0400 Subject: [libata] Use ATA_UDMAx standard masks when filling driver's udma_mask info The ATA_UDMAx masks are self-documenting, and far better than manually writing in the hex mask. Note that pata_it8213 mask differed from the comment. Added a FIXME there. Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c') diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c b/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c index b7c8b13..40eb574 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_netcell.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int netcell_init_one (struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *e firmware deals with it */ .pio_mask = 0x1f, /* pio0-4 */ .mwdma_mask = 0x07, /* mwdma0-2 */ - .udma_mask = 0x3f, /* UDMA 133 */ + .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA5, /* UDMA 133 */ .port_ops = &netcell_ops, }; const struct ata_port_info *port_info[] = { &info, NULL }; -- cgit v1.1