From 512bb03f4957b0ea6ebcd82f6d34147fc7f83128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hanjun Guo Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:40:12 +0800 Subject: ACPI: processor: use dev_dbg() instead of dev_warn() when CPPC probe failed _CPC is a optinal object for processor device so it's fine for processor devices in DSDT without CPPC data, but when booting the system with CPPC enabled in the kernel but without its support in the firmware, I got lots of warnings on a 64 core system: [ 6.346016] acpi ACPI0007:00: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346028] acpi ACPI0007:01: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346039] acpi ACPI0007:02: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346050] acpi ACPI0007:03: CPPC data invalid or not present [ 6.346063] acpi ACPI0007:04: CPPC data invalid or not present ... [ 6.346737] acpi ACPI0007:3f: CPPC data invalid or not present This isn't much useful and a little bit noise, so switch the dev_warn() to dev_dbg(). Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c index 591d1dd..9d6aff2 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int __acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device) result = acpi_cppc_processor_probe(pr); if (result && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS)) - dev_warn(&device->dev, "CPPC data invalid or not present\n"); + dev_dbg(&device->dev, "CPPC data invalid or not present\n"); if (!cpuidle_get_driver() || cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver) acpi_processor_power_init(pr); -- cgit v1.1