From dab6cf55f81a6e16b8147aed9a843e1691dcd318 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Schwidefsky Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:29:40 +0200 Subject: s390/ptrace: fix PSW mask check The PSW mask check of the PTRACE_POKEUSR_AREA command is incorrect. The PSW_MASK_USER define contains the PSW_MASK_ASC bits, the ptrace interface accepts all combinations for the address-space-control bits. To protect the kernel space the PSW mask check in ptrace needs to reject the address-space-control bit combination for home space. Fixes CVE-2014-3534 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c index 2d716734..5dc7ad9 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -334,9 +334,14 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data) unsigned long mask = PSW_MASK_USER; mask |= is_ri_task(child) ? PSW_MASK_RI : 0; - if ((data & ~mask) != PSW_USER_BITS) + if ((data ^ PSW_USER_BITS) & ~mask) + /* Invalid psw mask. */ + return -EINVAL; + if ((data & PSW_MASK_ASC) == PSW_ASC_HOME) + /* Invalid address-space-control bits */ return -EINVAL; if ((data & PSW_MASK_EA) && !(data & PSW_MASK_BA)) + /* Invalid addressing mode bits */ return -EINVAL; } *(addr_t *)((addr_t) &task_pt_regs(child)->psw + addr) = data; @@ -672,9 +677,12 @@ static int __poke_user_compat(struct task_struct *child, mask |= is_ri_task(child) ? PSW32_MASK_RI : 0; /* Build a 64 bit psw mask from 31 bit mask. */ - if ((tmp & ~mask) != PSW32_USER_BITS) + if ((tmp ^ PSW32_USER_BITS) & ~mask) /* Invalid psw mask. */ return -EINVAL; + if ((data & PSW32_MASK_ASC) == PSW32_ASC_HOME) + /* Invalid address-space-control bits */ + return -EINVAL; regs->psw.mask = (regs->psw.mask & ~PSW_MASK_USER) | (regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_BA) | (__u64)(tmp & mask) << 32; -- cgit v1.1