From 44259b1abfaa8bb819d25d41d71e8e33e25dd36a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:31:28 -0400 Subject: x86-64: Move vread_tsc into a new file with sensible options vread_tsc is short and hot, and it's userspace code so the usual reasons to enable -pg and turn off sibling calls don't apply. (OK, turning off sibling calls has no effect. But it might someday...) As an added benefit, tsc.c is profilable now. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Borislav Petkov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/%3C99c6d7f5efa3ccb65b4ac6eb443e1ab7bad47d7b.1306156808.git.luto%40mit.edu%3E Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 8 +++++--- arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 34 ---------------------------------- arch/x86/kernel/vread_tsc_64.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/vread_tsc_64.c (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile index 2508064..f5abe3a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ CPPFLAGS_vmlinux.lds += -U$(UTS_MACHINE) ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER # Do not profile debug and lowlevel utilities -CFLAGS_REMOVE_tsc.o = -pg CFLAGS_REMOVE_rtc.o = -pg CFLAGS_REMOVE_paravirt-spinlocks.o = -pg CFLAGS_REMOVE_pvclock.o = -pg @@ -24,13 +23,16 @@ endif nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) CFLAGS_vsyscall_64.o := $(PROFILING) -g0 $(nostackp) CFLAGS_hpet.o := $(nostackp) -CFLAGS_tsc.o := $(nostackp) +CFLAGS_vread_tsc_64.o := $(nostackp) CFLAGS_paravirt.o := $(nostackp) GCOV_PROFILE_vsyscall_64.o := n GCOV_PROFILE_hpet.o := n GCOV_PROFILE_tsc.o := n GCOV_PROFILE_paravirt.o := n +# vread_tsc_64 is hot and should be fully optimized: +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vread_tsc_64.o = -pg -fno-optimize-sibling-calls + obj-y := process_$(BITS).o signal.o entry_$(BITS).o obj-y += traps.o irq.o irq_$(BITS).o dumpstack_$(BITS).o obj-y += time.o ioport.o ldt.o dumpstack.o @@ -39,7 +41,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) += irq_work.o obj-y += probe_roms.o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += sys_i386_32.o i386_ksyms_32.o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += sys_x86_64.o x8664_ksyms_64.o -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += syscall_64.o vsyscall_64.o +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += syscall_64.o vsyscall_64.o vread_tsc_64.o obj-y += bootflag.o e820.o obj-y += pci-dma.o quirks.o topology.o kdebugfs.o obj-y += alternative.o i8253.o pci-nommu.o hw_breakpoint.o diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c index 24249a5..6cc6922 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c @@ -763,40 +763,6 @@ static cycle_t read_tsc(struct clocksource *cs) ret : clocksource_tsc.cycle_last; } -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 -static cycle_t __vsyscall_fn vread_tsc(void) -{ - cycle_t ret; - u64 last; - - /* - * Empirically, a fence (of type that depends on the CPU) - * before rdtsc is enough to ensure that rdtsc is ordered - * with respect to loads. The various CPU manuals are unclear - * as to whether rdtsc can be reordered with later loads, - * but no one has ever seen it happen. - */ - rdtsc_barrier(); - ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles(); - - last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last; - - if (likely(ret >= last)) - return ret; - - /* - * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely - * predictable (it's just a funciton of time and the likely is - * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC - * to generate a branch instead. I don't barrier() because - * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function - * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code. - */ - asm volatile (""); - return last; -} -#endif - static void resume_tsc(struct clocksource *cs) { clocksource_tsc.cycle_last = 0; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vread_tsc_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vread_tsc_64.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a81aa9e --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vread_tsc_64.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +/* This code runs in userspace. */ + +#define DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING +#include + +notrace cycle_t __vsyscall_fn vread_tsc(void) +{ + cycle_t ret; + u64 last; + + /* + * Empirically, a fence (of type that depends on the CPU) + * before rdtsc is enough to ensure that rdtsc is ordered + * with respect to loads. The various CPU manuals are unclear + * as to whether rdtsc can be reordered with later loads, + * but no one has ever seen it happen. + */ + rdtsc_barrier(); + ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles(); + + last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last; + + if (likely(ret >= last)) + return ret; + + /* + * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely + * predictable (it's just a funciton of time and the likely is + * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC + * to generate a branch instead. I don't barrier() because + * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function + * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code. + */ + asm volatile (""); + return last; +} -- cgit v1.1