From 7bcb63b21327427b130edeb6e6ad44ee260b3043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:46:54 +0200
Subject: microblaze: Fix put_user macro for 64bits arguments
For 64bits arguments gcc caused that put_user macro
works with wrong value because of optimalization.
Adding volatile caused that gcc not optimized it.
It is possible to use (as Blackfin do) two put_user
macros with 32bits arguments but there is one more
instruction which is due to duplication zero return
value which is called put_user_asm macro.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
---
arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
(limited to 'arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h')
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 65adad6..5431b46 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ extern long strnlen_user(const char *src, long count);
#define __put_user(x, ptr) \
({ \
- __typeof__(*(ptr)) __gu_val = x; \
+ __typeof__(*(ptr)) volatile __gu_val = (x); \
long __gu_err = 0; \
switch (sizeof(__gu_val)) { \
case 1: \
--
cgit v1.1