From 7fdd3c49629e8aab48dbd1b2f800854b0f93cba0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:42:48 +0100 Subject: ARM: perf: make name of arm_pmu_type consistent Commit f12482c9 ("ARM: 6974/1: pmu: refactor reservation") changed {release,reserve}_pmu to take an enum arm_pmu_type as a parameter, but inconsistently named the parameter `type' or `device'. It would be nice if these were consistent. This patch makes use of enum arm_pmu_type consistent, always using `type'. Related printks are updated, explicitly mentioning `type' also. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/include') diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h index 8ae32ba..b7e82c4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct arm_pmu_platdata { * encoded error on failure. */ extern struct platform_device * -reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device); +reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type); /** * release_pmu() - Relinquish control of the performance counters @@ -62,26 +62,26 @@ release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type); * the actual hardware initialisation. */ extern int -init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device); +init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type); #else /* CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU */ #include static inline struct platform_device * -reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device) +reserve_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type) { return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); } static inline int -release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device) +release_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type) { return -ENODEV; } static inline int -init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type device) +init_pmu(enum arm_pmu_type type) { return -ENODEV; } -- cgit v1.1