From f8b4ece2a94693b7d2dd32ea716cb92545b5dce6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pekka Enberg Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:53:11 +0200 Subject: kmemcheck: use kmemcheck_pte_lookup() instead of open-coding it Lets use kmemcheck_pte_lookup() in kmemcheck_fault() instead of open-coding it there. Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum --- arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c index a644f24..6931e51 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c @@ -611,7 +611,6 @@ bool kmemcheck_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, unsigned long error_code) { pte_t *pte; - unsigned int level; /* * XXX: Is it safe to assume that memory accesses from virtual 86 @@ -624,13 +623,9 @@ bool kmemcheck_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address, if (regs->cs != __KERNEL_CS) return false; - pte = lookup_address(address, &level); + pte = kmemcheck_pte_lookup(address); if (!pte) return false; - if (level != PG_LEVEL_4K) - return false; - if (!pte_hidden(*pte)) - return false; if (error_code & 2) kmemcheck_access(regs, address, KMEMCHECK_WRITE); -- cgit v1.1