From b0d045ca45a44d9f8bd66d0a10558b10c60f895a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerrit Renker Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:42:27 -0700 Subject: [DCCP]: Parameter renaming The parameter `seq' of dccp_send_sync() is in fact an acknowledgement number and not a sequence number - thus renamed by this patch into `ackno'. Secondly, a `critical' warning is added when a Sync/SyncAck could not be sent. Sanity: I have checked all other functions that are called in dccp_transmit_skb, there are no clashes with the use of dccpd_ack_seq; no other function is using this slot at the same time. Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/dccp/output.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c index c8d843e..6e23d5b 100644 --- a/net/dccp/output.c +++ b/net/dccp/output.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int dccp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) case DCCP_PKT_SYNC: case DCCP_PKT_SYNCACK: - ackno = dcb->dccpd_seq; + ackno = dcb->dccpd_ack_seq; /* fall through */ default: /* @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ void dccp_send_delayed_ack(struct sock *sk) sk_reset_timer(sk, &icsk->icsk_delack_timer, timeout); } -void dccp_send_sync(struct sock *sk, const u64 seq, +void dccp_send_sync(struct sock *sk, const u64 ackno, const enum dccp_pkt_type pkt_type) { /* @@ -517,14 +517,16 @@ void dccp_send_sync(struct sock *sk, const u64 seq, */ struct sk_buff *skb = alloc_skb(sk->sk_prot->max_header, GFP_ATOMIC); - if (skb == NULL) + if (skb == NULL) { /* FIXME: how to make sure the sync is sent? */ + DCCP_CRIT("could not send %s", dccp_packet_name(pkt_type)); return; + } /* Reserve space for headers and prepare control bits. */ skb_reserve(skb, sk->sk_prot->max_header); DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_type = pkt_type; - DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq = seq; + DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_ack_seq = ackno; dccp_transmit_skb(sk, skb); } -- cgit v1.1